Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "311b857".
Did you mean:
3118,7
2014 Sep 06
5
[PATCH] virtio_blk: merge S/G list entries by default
...didn't update the existing drivers to keep their
previous behavior.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch at lst.de>
---
drivers/block/virtio_blk.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
index 0a58140..311b857 100644
--- a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
+++ b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
@@ -634,7 +634,7 @@ static int virtblk_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
vblk->tag_set.ops = &virtio_mq_ops;
vblk->tag_set.queue_depth = virtblk_queue_depth;
vblk->tag_set.numa_node = NUMA_NO_NODE;
- vblk-&g...
2014 Sep 06
5
[PATCH] virtio_blk: merge S/G list entries by default
...didn't update the existing drivers to keep their
previous behavior.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch at lst.de>
---
drivers/block/virtio_blk.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
index 0a58140..311b857 100644
--- a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
+++ b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
@@ -634,7 +634,7 @@ static int virtblk_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
vblk->tag_set.ops = &virtio_mq_ops;
vblk->tag_set.queue_depth = virtblk_queue_depth;
vblk->tag_set.numa_node = NUMA_NO_NODE;
- vblk-&g...
2014 Sep 07
0
[PATCH] virtio_blk: merge S/G list entries by default
...t;
OK so this is an optimization patch right?
What kind of performance gain is observed with it?
> ---
> drivers/block/virtio_blk.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
> index 0a58140..311b857 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
> @@ -634,7 +634,7 @@ static int virtblk_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> vblk->tag_set.ops = &virtio_mq_ops;
> vblk->tag_set.queue_depth = virtblk_queue_depth;
> vblk->tag_set.numa_...