search for: 31152e8

...ichael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd at arndb.de> --- arch/arm/include/asm/barrier.h | 23 +---------------------- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 22 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/barrier.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/barrier.h index 3ff5642..31152e8 100644 --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/barrier.h +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/barrier.h @@ -70,28 +70,7 @@ extern void arm_heavy_mb(void); #define smp_wmb() dmb(ishst) #endif -#define smp_store_release(p, v) \ -do { \ - compiletime_assert_atomic_type(*p); \ - smp_mb(); \ - WRITE_...

...e. Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd at arndb.de> --- arch/arm/include/asm/barrier.h | 12 +++--------- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/barrier.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/barrier.h index 31152e8..112cc1a 100644 --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/barrier.h +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/barrier.h @@ -60,15 +60,9 @@ extern void arm_heavy_mb(void); #define dma_wmb() barrier() #endif -#ifndef CONFIG_SMP -#define smp_mb() barrier() -#define smp_rmb() barrier() -#define smp_wmb() barrier() -#else -#defi...

This is really trying to cleanup some virt code, as suggested by Peter, who said > You could of course go fix that instead of mutilating things into > sort-of functional state. This work is needed for virtio, so it's probably easiest to merge it through my tree - is this fine by everyone? Arnd, if you agree, could you ack this please? Note to arch maintainers: please don't

This is really trying to cleanup some virt code, as suggested by Peter, who said > You could of course go fix that instead of mutilating things into > sort-of functional state. This work is needed for virtio, so it's probably easiest to merge it through my tree - is this fine by everyone? Arnd, if you agree, could you ack this please? Note to arch maintainers: please don't

Changes since v2: - extended checkpatch tests for barriers, and added patches teaching it to warn about incorrect usage of barriers (__smp_xxx barriers are for use by asm-generic code only), should help prevent misuse by arch code to address comments by Russell King - patched more instances of xen to use virt_ barriers as suggested by Stefano Stabellini - implemented a 2 byte xchg on sh

Changes since v2: - extended checkpatch tests for barriers, and added patches teaching it to warn about incorrect usage of barriers (__smp_xxx barriers are for use by asm-generic code only), should help prevent misuse by arch code to address comments by Russell King - patched more instances of xen to use virt_ barriers as suggested by Stefano Stabellini - implemented a 2 byte xchg on sh

Changes since v1: - replaced my asm-generic patch with an equivalent patch already in tip - add wrappers with virt_ prefix for better code annotation, as suggested by David Miller - dropped XXX in patch names as this makes vger choke, Cc all relevant mailing lists on all patches (not personal email, as the list becomes too long then) I parked this in vhost tree for now, but the

Changes since v1: - replaced my asm-generic patch with an equivalent patch already in tip - add wrappers with virt_ prefix for better code annotation, as suggested by David Miller - dropped XXX in patch names as this makes vger choke, Cc all relevant mailing lists on all patches (not personal email, as the list becomes too long then) I parked this in vhost tree for now, but the