search for: 310mb

...e mount: 1000MB/s write 325MB/s read Distributed only servers 1+2: Fuse mount on server 1: 900MB/s write iozone 4 streams 320MB/s read iozone 4 streams single stream read 91MB/s @64K, 141MB/s @1M simultaneous iozone 4 stream 5G files Server 1: 1200MB/s write, 200MB/s read Server 2: 950MB/s write, 310MB/s read I did some earlier single brick tests with samba VFS and 3 workstations and got up to 750MB/s write and 800MB/s read aggregate but that's still not good. These are the only volume settings tweaks I have made (after much single box testing to find what actually made a difference): per...

...r central office is connected to the internet via T1 and the other office is connected to the internet via DSL. rsync is being run at the remote office to pull data down from the central office so I expect to see transfer speeds at a maximum of ~150KB/s, or so. Instead I'm seeing this on a ~310mb file (just one example): 0 0% 0.00kB/s 0:00:00 13372944 4% 12.75MB/s 0:00:23 22294152 7% 10.63MB/s 0:00:26 32173104 10% 10.23MB/s 0:00:26 .... 313022664 99% 2.63MB/s 0:00:00 314732544 100% 6.05MB/s 0:00:49 (xfer#223,...

...gt; Distributed only servers 1+2: > Fuse mount on server 1: > 900MB/s write iozone 4 streams > 320MB/s read iozone 4 streams > single stream read 91MB/s @64K, 141MB/s @1M > simultaneous iozone 4 stream 5G files > Server 1: 1200MB/s write, 200MB/s read > Server 2: 950MB/s write, 310MB/s read > > I did some earlier single brick tests with samba VFS and 3 workstations > and got up to 750MB/s write and 800MB/s read aggregate but that's still not > good. > > These are the only volume settings tweaks I have made (after much single > box testing to find what a...

...gt; Distributed only servers 1+2: > Fuse mount on server 1: > 900MB/s write iozone 4 streams > 320MB/s read iozone 4 streams > single stream read 91MB/s @64K, 141MB/s @1M > simultaneous iozone 4 stream 5G files > Server 1: 1200MB/s write, 200MB/s read > Server 2: 950MB/s write, 310MB/s read > > I did some earlier single brick tests with samba VFS and 3 workstations and got up to 750MB/s write and 800MB/s read aggregate but that's still not good. > > These are the only volume settings tweaks I have made (after much single box testing to find what actually mad...

...te history of the repository, then a git clone of the git-svn mirror will give you this very cheaply and with the added bonus that you can then commit to the local copy and still push things upstream (and merge changes from upstream). A fresh clone of the llvm and clang git mirrors transfers about 310MB for LLVM and about 190MB for Clang. What do you want to do with the svnsync copy? David > On 27 Feb 2015, at 10:27, Oliver Schneider <llvm at assarbad.net> wrote: > > Hi folks, > > in a rather old thread on this list titled "svnsync of llvm tree" > <http://...

Hi folks, in a rather old thread on this list titled "svnsync of llvm tree" <http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.compilers.llvm.devel/42523> we noticed that an svnsync would fail due to a few particularly big commits that apparently caused OOM conditions on the server. The error and the revision number were consistent for different people. That seems to be fixed now. I succeeded

Greetings, I have been trying to install Cool Edit Pro 1.2. I'm running Mandrake 8.1, which came with Wine release 20010731. This is a dual-boot system with MS-DOS 6.22 in addition to Mandrake 8.1. There NO version of Windoze of any kind is installed. I have 512 MB of RAM; the DOS partition has 941 MB free and 777 permissions. I mount the CD-ROM drive, cd to it, and execute wine setup.exe

G''day, all, So, I''ve decided to migrate my home server from Linux+swRAID+LVM to Solaris+ZFS, because it seems to hold much better promise for data integrity, which is my primary concern. However, naturally, I decided to do some benchmarks in the process, and I don''t understand why the results are what they are. I though I had a reasonable understanding of ZFS, but now