search for: 30z0_khmaqaj

....com/foru > m/#!topic/generic-abi/MPr8TVtnVn4 > Based on feedback from the generic-abi thread I looked at the object file size and link time impact of a few other representations for the address-significance table. My results are here: https://groups.google. com/d/msg/generic-abi/MPr8TVtnVn4/30Z0_KHMAQAJ One of the proposals (a compressed array of symbol attributes) is slightly more expensive than what I originally proposed (+0.03% object file size, +1% link time) but it would allow for future expansion and therefore seems more appropriate for the gABI. That's not really a concern for us thoug...

...neric-abi/MPr8TVtnVn4 >> > > Based on feedback from the generic-abi thread I looked at the object file > size and link time impact of a few other representations for the > address-significance table. My results are here: > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/generic-abi/MPr8TVtnVn4/30Z0_KHMAQAJ > > One of the proposals (a compressed array of symbol attributes) is slightly > more expensive than what I originally proposed (+0.03% object file size, > +1% link time) but it would allow for future expansion and therefore seems > more appropriate for the gABI. That's not reall...

...;>> >> >> Based on feedback from the generic-abi thread I looked at the object file >> size and link time impact of a few other representations for the >> address-significance table. My results are here: https://groups.google. >> com/d/msg/generic-abi/MPr8TVtnVn4/30Z0_KHMAQAJ >> >> One of the proposals (a compressed array of symbol attributes) is >> slightly more expensive than what I originally proposed (+0.03% object file >> size, +1% link time) but it would allow for future expansion and therefore >> seems more appropriate for the gABI....

On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 12:16 PM, Peter Collingbourne <peter at pcc.me.uk> wrote: > On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 3:25 AM, Peter Smith <peter.smith at linaro.org> > wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> I think that the approach of using a section to record address >> significance is a good one. I'm guessing it will have its own section >> type and format? If

On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 3:25 AM, Peter Smith <peter.smith at linaro.org> wrote: > Hello, > > I think that the approach of using a section to record address > significance is a good one. I'm guessing it will have its own section > type and format? If it does would it make sense to try and submit this > to the GABI https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/generic-abi as