search for: 30mib

Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "30mib".

Did you mean: 30mb
2010 Jan 20
2
SMB/CIFS seq. transfers top out at 30MiB/s (NFSv4 and HTTP: 100MiB/s+)
...he actual available bandwidth between the server and the nodes over TCP amounts to about 940-980MBit (according to iperf). The server's storage backend is aquite potent, and achieves sequential read and write speeds well over the network's linespeed (somewhere around 180MiB/s read and 130MiB/s write at worst and well over 200MiB/s and 160MiB/s, resp., at best). When serving files from the very same filesystem as with Samba, Apache 2.2 delivers about 110MiB/s on average, and NFSv4-transfers match that number in terms of speed. With Samba and SMB/CIFS, however, the transfer speed top...
2016 Dec 22
0
syslinux mkisofs hard-disk-boot isohybrid
...y ignored by relevant Syslinux developer(s) in the past, I decided to avoid such waste of my time. (Additionally, my tolerance for top-posting is getting smaller and smaller; sadly, I am getting older and grumpier). @Thomas, yes, I performed a similar test "successfully". I created a 30MiB HDD image, MBR plus one partition, flagged as both "boot" and "esp", FAT16. The FAT16 partition includes "/EFI/BOOT/" and within it the relevant syslinux.efi-related files (with the EFI bootloader renamed to the default "BOOT<arch_type>.EFI" naming)...
2016 Dec 22
6
syslinux mkisofs hard-disk-boot isohybrid
Hi, Didier Spaier wrote: > The issue is the inability of booting of a *physical* (not virtual) optical > media, like for instance a DVD or a CD, using syslinux.efi. Actually firmware cannot find any UEFI specified booting starting points in an ISO 9660 filesystem that was created with mkisofs -b and -hard-disk-boot, but without a boot image which was marked as EFI System Partition. The
2012 Oct 29
13
POLL: v2.2 to allow one mail over quota?
Currently if user is 1MB under quota and someone tries to deliver mail that is over 1MB, Dovecot rejects the mail. But smaller mails aren't rejected probably for days. So user might not even realize that they didn't receive one of the mails. Also having a user "almost over quota" is a rather strange state I think. So what do you think about v2.2 allowing delivery of one last