search for: 309d3561

Displaying 1 result from an estimated 1 matches for "309d3561".

Did you mean: 309361
2015 Jan 14
3
[LLVMdev] [RFC][PATCH][OPENCL] synchronization scopes redux
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 10:27 PM, Sameer Sahasrabuddhe < sameer.sahasrabuddhe at amd.com> wrote: > Ping! We need to close on whether everyone is convinced that symbolic > memory scopes have a significant advantage over opaque numbers. Either of > them will be examined by optimizations using a target-implemented API. I > personally don't think that readability in the LLVM