search for: 3072k

...rooted into the debian install (chroot /boot /bin/bash) and was able to set everything up, install requisite packages, install xen, etc. Now I''m at the last step and I''ve run into problems. When I point grub at xen.gz it complains loudly: GNU GRUB version 0.95 (640K lower / 3072K upper memory) [ Minimal BASH-like line editing is supported. For the first word, TAB lists possible command completions. Anywhere else TAB lists the possible completions of a device/filename. ] grub> root (hd0,0) Filesystem type is ext2fs, partition type 0x83 grub> kernel /boot/xen.g...

...geub loader error 2 on starting centos and i am able to connect rescue system this is the result how could i get system work root at rescuecd64 ~ # grub Probing devices to guess BIOS drives. This may take a long time. Unknown partition table signature GNU GRUB version 0.97 (640K lower / 3072K upper memory) [ Minimal BASH-like line editing is supported. For the first word, TAB lists possible command completions. Anywhere else TAB lists the possible completions of a device/filename. ] grub> find /boot/grub/stage1 find /boot/grub/stage1 E...

Hello, I have an odd problem on a dual processor, dual core Opteron system. Obviosously it is x86_64 so should have no problem large amounts of RAM. The system has 4 GB installed (2GB on each processor). If I boot the system with a fresh install of Debian Etch it sees all the memory fine. dmesg reports: Memory: 4107008k/5242880k available (1929k kernel code, 86836k reserved, 864k data, 176k

...ve them. One other notable difference that shows up is the BIOS initial video mode is different in native EFI mode: @@ -374,11 +379,11 @@ pciehp: PCI Express Hot Plug Controller Driver version: 0.4 nvidiafb: Device ID: 10de0ff6 efifb: probing for efifb -efifb: framebuffer at 0x81000000, using 3072k, total 3072k -efifb: mode is 1024x768x32, linelength=4096, pages=1 +efifb: framebuffer at 0x70000000, using 8100k, total 8100k +efifb: mode is 1920x1080x32, linelength=7680, pages=1 efifb: scrolling: redraw efifb: Truecolor: size=8:8:8:8, shift=24:16:8:0 -Console: switching to colour frame buffer...

Hello, I have an odd problem on a dual processor, dual core Opteron system. Obviosously it is x86_64 so should have no problem with large amounts of RAM. The system has 4 GB installed (2GB on each processor). If I boot the system with a fresh install of Debian Etch it sees all the memory fine. dmesg reports: Memory: 4107008k/5242880k available (1929k kernel code, 86836k reserved, 864k data, 176k

...------------------------------------------------ And the reconfiguration of GRUB on both disks did not give problems: --------------------------------------------------------------------- [root at localhost grub]# grub --device-map=/boot/grub/device.map GNU GRUB version 0.97 (640K lower / 3072K upper memory) [ Minimal BASH-like line editing is supported. For the first word, TAB lists possible command completions. Anywhere else TAB lists the possible completions of a device/filename.] grub> root (hd0,0) root (hd0,0) Filesystem type is ext2fs, partition type 0xfd grub> setu...

I removed an ATA drive (/home) for a new SATA and my system would not boot. I'm guessing that it put the MBR on that drive instead of the drive that holds the / partition. What's the best way confirm where the MBR resides and, after I verify that's my problem, how I can move (or make a copy) onto a different drive? Thanks, Scott

...---------------------------------------------- And the reconfiguration of GRUB on both disks did not give problems: - --------------------------------------------------------------------- [root at localhost grub]# grub --device-map=/boot/grub/device.map GNU GRUB version 0.97 (640K lower / 3072K upper memory) [ Minimal BASH-like line editing is supported. For the first word, TAB lists possible command completions. Anywhere else TAB lists the possible completions of a device/filename.] grub> root (hd0,0) root (hd0,0) Filesystem type is ext2fs, partition type 0xfd grub> setu...

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27064 Summary: Nouveau fails to start X. This is a Nvidia G210m, the laptop is an asus UL50vt Product: xorg Version: 7.5 Platform: x86-64 (AMD64) OS/Version: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: medium Component: Driver/nouveau

...v/shm # mount -o bind /sys /mnt/rescue/sys # chroot /mnt/rescue *I checked the device.map* # cat /boot/grub/device.map (hd0) /dev/sda (hd1) /dev/sdb *And, install the grub.* # grub Probing devices to guess BIOS drives. This may take a long time. GNU GRUB version 0.97 (640K lower / 3072K upper memory) [ Minimal BASH-like line editing is supported. For the first word, TAB lists possible command completions. Anywhere else TAB lists the possible completions of a device/filename.] grub> root (hd0,0) root (hd0,0) Filesystem type is ext2fs, partition type 0xfd grub> setu...

On 08/05/2015 10:23 AM, Chris Murphy wrote: > Nothing about hd0 or hd1 gets baked into the bootloader code. It's an > absolute reference to a physical drive at the moment in time the > command is made. Is that true? If I have a system with two disks, where device.map labels one as hd0 and the other as hd1, and I swap those numbers, the resulting boot sector will differ by one bit.

...225280 Aug 18 21:11 initramfs.ext2 -rw-r--r-- 1 src src 57645 Aug 19 00:07 initramfs.ext2.gz Finally, here's the boot messages from my successful boot: ... NET4: Unix domain sockets 1.0/SMP for Linux NET4.0. RAMDISK: Compressed image found at block 0 Freeing initrd memory: 3072K VFS: Mounted root (ext2 filesystem). Freeing init memory: 76K INITRAMFS: Loading root image into /dev/ram1: done INITRAMFS: Mounting /dev/ram1: done INITRAMFS: Switching root: done INIT: version 2.74 booting Loading modules: INIT: Entering runlevel: 3 Starting system logger: syslogd Starting ker...

...r: 9, 2097152 bytes) [ 0.084005] Mount-cache hash table entries: 256 [ 0.084005] Initializing cgroup subsys ns [ 0.084085] Initializing cgroup subsys cpuacct [ 0.084142] Initializing cgroup subsys devices [ 0.084215] CPU: L1 I cache: 32K, L1 D cache: 32K [ 0.084311] CPU: L2 cache: 3072K [ 0.084366] CPU 0/0 -> Node 0 [ 0.084421] CPU: Physical Processor ID: 0 [ 0.084475] CPU: Processor Core ID: 0 [ 0.084534] CPU0: Thermal monitoring enabled (TM2) [ 0.084591] using mwait in idle threads. [ 0.085504] ACPI: Core revision 20080321 [ 0.152009] CPU0: Intel(R) Core(...

...r: 9, 2097152 bytes) [ 0.084005] Mount-cache hash table entries: 256 [ 0.084005] Initializing cgroup subsys ns [ 0.084085] Initializing cgroup subsys cpuacct [ 0.084142] Initializing cgroup subsys devices [ 0.084215] CPU: L1 I cache: 32K, L1 D cache: 32K [ 0.084311] CPU: L2 cache: 3072K [ 0.084366] CPU 0/0 -> Node 0 [ 0.084421] CPU: Physical Processor ID: 0 [ 0.084475] CPU: Processor Core ID: 0 [ 0.084534] CPU0: Thermal monitoring enabled (TM2) [ 0.084591] using mwait in idle threads. [ 0.085504] ACPI: Core revision 20080321 [ 0.152009] CPU0: Intel(R) Core(...

Hi Konrad I encountered a bug when trying to bring offline a cpu then online it again in HVM. As I''m not very familiar with HVM stuffs I cannot come up with a quick fix. The HVM DomU is configured with 4 vcpus. After booting into command prompt, I do following operations. # echo 0 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu3/online # echo 1 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu3/online With

I just installed centos 5.5 x86_64 on a new HP laptop. It has the core i5 processor. only 1 cpu is detected should be 2. This has happened before. Is upstream not keeping up with new processors released and updating the kernel? I'd rather not go through the process again of putting a newer kernel on the machine and having something different out there than "stock" centos. Jerry