search for: 306m

Does anyone recommend any particular SAS controller, or should I use an Ultra-320 SCSI controller instead? My machine is an IBM xSeries 306m. It has a SAS controller provided on a daughter card, but it''s not supported in the 2.6.16 kernel, so I''m looking for a separate disk controller card that will work with my existing SAS disks. -- James Holmes Programmer/SysAdmin RTDS Technologies Inc. -- http://www.rtds.com _...

...1/msg/6 279M ./51/msg/0 174M ./51/msg/10 273M ./51/msg/2 341M ./51/msg/7 408M ./51/msg/4 222M ./51/msg/11 174M ./51/msg/5 238M ./51/msg/1 271M ./51/msg/3 3.3G ./51/msg 3.3G ./51 after changing the directory and running du again I get different numbers #cd 51 du -h 306M ./msg/8 676M ./msg/9 351M ./msg/6 338M ./msg/0 347M ./msg/10 394M ./msg/2 480M ./msg/7 544M ./msg/4 407M ./msg/11 312M ./msg/5 326M ./msg/1 377M ./msg/3 4.8G ./msg 4.8G . Do you have any idea what could cause this behaviour?

On 5/5/2017 8:34 ??, Gianluca Cecchi wrote: > Your /mnt/sysimage/boot is under tmpfs not real disk... Sorry, I am not an expert, but it does seem to NOT be under tmpfs: Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on ... /dev/vdal 497M 192M 306M 39% /mnt/sysimage/boot ... Why do you say that the boot partition is under tmpfs? Nick

...The following are the results. Thanks in advance for your help. Best, Xuehai 1. cctest1 (dumU) ************************************************************************************************** cctest1$ df -lh Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/sda1 1.5G 1.1G 306M 78% / tmpfs 62M 4.0K 62M 1% /dev/shm /dev/sda6 4.2G 3.6G 453M 89% /tmp /dev/sda5 938M 205M 685M 23% /var cctest1$ dmesg | grep DMA DMA zone: 101376 pages, LIFO batch:16 cctest1$ for i in `seq 1 10`; do hdparm -tT /dev/sda1; done Timing ca...

On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 2:38 PM, Nikolaos Milas <nmilas at noa.gr> wrote: > On 5/5/2017 3:15 ??, Gianluca Cecchi wrote: > > ... >> grub2-install /dev/vda >> ... >> Was this one of the command you already tried? >> > > Yes, I have tried that multiple times, both from Troubleshooting Mode > (booting using CentOS 7 Installation CD) and from within the

...The following are the results. Thanks in advance for your help. Best, Xuehai 1. cctest1 (dumU) ************************************************************************************************** cctest1$ df -lh Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/sda1 1.5G 1.1G 306M 78% / tmpfs 62M 4.0K 62M 1% /dev/shm /dev/sda6 4.2G 3.6G 453M 89% /tmp /dev/sda5 938M 205M 685M 23% /var cctest1$ dmesg | grep DMA DMA zone: 101376 pages, LIFO batch:16 cctest1$ for i in `seq 1 10`; do hdparm -tT /dev/sda1; done Timing ca...

Hi John, Ashish, Still no luck . I have tried your commands in root folder. It's showing max size 384 only in home directory. But if i try df -h shown 579. Is there any way to find out recycle bin folder On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 2:16 PM, Ashish Yadav <gwalashish at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Chandran, > > > On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 10:38 AM, Chandran Manikandan <tech2mani at

.... df -h shows a lot of info, for instance on one of my servers, I see... # df -h Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/mapper/vg_free-lv_root 50G 7.7G 39G 17% / tmpfs 12G 0 12G 0% /dev/shm /dev/sda1 477M 146M 306M 33% /boot /dev/mapper/vg_free-lv_home 30G 7.1G 23G 25% /home /dev/mapper/vg_free-lvpgsql 30G 671M 30G 3% /var/lib/pgsql /dev/mapper/vg_free-lvimages 150G 61G 90G 41% /var/lib/libvirt/images /dev/mapper/vgdata-lvho...

...993M 1% /run tmpfs 1001M 0 1001M 0% /sys/fs/cgroup /dev/sr0 680M 680M 0 100% /run/install/repo tmpfs 1001M 300K 1001M 1% /tmp /dev/mapper/centos-root 18G 1.5G 16G 9% /mnt/sysimage /dev/vdal 497M 192M 306M 39% /mnt/sysimage/boot /tmpfs 1001M 0 1001M 0% /mnt/sysimage/dev/shm > If it is mounted on another mount point in your live env go and umount it > and run > mount /dev/vda1 /mnt/sysimage/boot Didn't need to. > then > chroot /mnt/sysimage OK, I did so...

...993M 1% /run tmpfs 1001M 0 1001M 0% /sys/fs/cgroup /dev/sr0 680M 680M 0 100% /run/install/repo tmpfs 1001M 300K 1001M 1% /tmp /dev/mapper/centos-root 18G 1.5G 16G 9% /mnt/sysimage /dev/vdal 497M 192M 306M 39% /mnt/sysimage/boot /tmpfs 1001M 0 1001M 0% /mnt/sysimage/dev/shm If it is mounted on another mount point in your live env go and umount it > and run > mount /dev/vda1 /mnt/sysimage/boot > Didn't need to. then > chroot /mnt/sysimage > OK, I did s...

...instance on one of my servers, I see... > > # df -h > Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on > /dev/mapper/vg_free-lv_root > 50G 7.7G 39G 17% / > tmpfs 12G 0 12G 0% /dev/shm > /dev/sda1 477M 146M 306M 33% /boot > /dev/mapper/vg_free-lv_home > 30G 7.1G 23G 25% /home > /dev/mapper/vg_free-lvpgsql > 30G 671M 30G 3% /var/lib/pgsql > /dev/mapper/vg_free-lvimages > 150G 61G 90G 41% /var/lib/libvirt/ima...

Hello A box of mine running RELENG_7_0 and ZFS over a couple of disks (6 disks, 3 mirrors) seems to have gotten stuck. From Ctrl-T: load: 0.50 cmd: zsh 40188 [zfs:&buf_hash_table.ht_locks[i].ht_lock] 0.02u 0.04s 0% 3404k load: 0.43 cmd: zsh 40188 [zfs:&buf_hash_table.ht_locks[i].ht_lock] 0.02u 0.04s 0% 3404k load: 0.10 cmd: zsh 40188 [zfs:&buf_hash_table.ht_locks[i].ht_lock]

Hi, I recently updated from puppet 3.1.1 to 3.2.1 and noticed quite a bit of increased load on the puppetmaster machine. I''m using the Apache/passenger/rack way of puppetmastering. Main symptom is: higher load on puppetmaster machine (8 cores): - 3.1.1: around 4 - 3.2.1: around 9-10 Any idea why there''s more load on the machine with 3.2.1? -- You received this

...ib/Target/ARM 342M build/lib/Analysis/CMakeFiles/LLVMAnalysis.dir 342M build/lib/Analysis/CMakeFiles 342M build/lib/Analysis 327M build/tools/lld 322M build/lib/Target/Mips 313M build/lib/Target/ARM/CMakeFiles/LLVMARMCodeGen.dir 313M build/lib/Target/ARM/CMakeFiles 307M build/lib/Target/WebAssembly 306M build/tools/clang/lib/ARCMigrate/CMakeFiles/clangARCMigrate.dir 306M build/tools/clang/lib/ARCMigrate/CMakeFiles 306M build/tools/clang/lib/ARCMigrate 304M build/lib/Target/AArch64/CMakeFiles/LLVMAArch64CodeGen.dir 304M build/lib/Target/AArch64/CMakeFiles 291M build/tools/polly 290M build/tools/pol...

Performace hits? Integration with existing applications? Security? Bugs? Memory use? -Ben Lisbakken -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.