search for: 306158

Is the following developed in my console output a recognized bug or am I using the cat function incorrectly? Thanks, Stan > ifelse(class(data[[n]])!="factor",{print("yes")},{print("no")}) [1] "yes" [1] "yes" > ifelse(class(data[[n]])!="factor",{cat("yes")},{cat("no")}) yesError in ans[test & !nas] <-

Hi Stepan, Sorry for the delay. It's great that you are working on MergeFunctions as well and I agree, we should definitely try to combine our efforts to improve MergeFunctions. Just to give you some context, the pass (with the similar function merging patch) is already being used in a production setting. From my point of view, it would be better if we focus on improving its capability

....02 110015 0 0.02 110015 consistent.ll 2 9625 0 0.01 9600 0 0.01 9600 ConsoleClose.ll 6 10504 0 0.01 10468 0 0.01 10468 constants.ll 6 468828 0 0.05 468813 0 0.05 468813 ConstructorDestructorAttributes.ll 3 1742 0 0.01 1730 0 0.01 1730 contain.ll 18 76106 0 0.02 76076 0 0.02 72452 context_ini.ll 12 306158 0 0.03 306137 0 0.03 306137 context.ll 2 20575 0 0.01 20557 0 0.01 20557 cont.ll 1 5257 0 0.01 5228 0 0.01 5228 convert.ll 5 15405 0 0.01 15375 0 0.01 15375 CopyCoder.ll 15 42021 0 0.01 41987 0 0.01 41987 CopyRegister.ll 2 3609 0 0.01 3575 0 0.01 3575 correct.ll 29 246517 0 0.03 246486 0 0.03 24648...