search for: 30276e95

On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 8:40 AM, Adrian Prantl via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Later loop unroll comes and unrolls the loop and then suddenly we have > two absolutely identical dbg.declares and the assert in addFragmentOffset() > blows. Who's at fault? > > Without having read the code yet, my intuition says that the unroller > should not be

> On Sep 19, 2017, at 6:33 AM, Mikael Holmén via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Hi Björn, > > I don't have any answers, just more confusion. Hopefully someone else can bring some light to this. > > I'm also interested in dbg.declares and what the rules are regarding them since it's not very clear to me at the moment. A dbg.declare

...re is no point. > > IR is supposed to be duplicatable unless it is marked noduplicate. That was ultimately the fix we applied for PR33157, right? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20170919/30276e95/attachment.html>