search for: 301,12

...MBOL(pci_iomap); This was EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL. I guess, for this patch, it should stay that way. ...Hm, everyone else has this stuff as EXPORT_SYMBOL looks like we should use that too. Regards, Sebastian > > void pci_iounmap(struct pci_dev *pdev, void __iomem *addr) > { > @@ -285,8 +301,12 @@ void pci_iounmap(struct pci_dev *pdev, void __iomem *addr) > > idx = (((__force u64) addr) & ~ZPCI_IOMAP_ADDR_BASE) >> 48; > spin_lock(&zpci_iomap_lock); > - zpci_iomap_start[idx].fh = 0; > - zpci_iomap_start[idx].bar = 0; > + /* Detect underrun */ > +...

...MBOL(pci_iomap); This was EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL. I guess, for this patch, it should stay that way. ...Hm, everyone else has this stuff as EXPORT_SYMBOL looks like we should use that too. Regards, Sebastian > > void pci_iounmap(struct pci_dev *pdev, void __iomem *addr) > { > @@ -285,8 +301,12 @@ void pci_iounmap(struct pci_dev *pdev, void __iomem *addr) > > idx = (((__force u64) addr) & ~ZPCI_IOMAP_ADDR_BASE) >> 48; > spin_lock(&zpci_iomap_lock); > - zpci_iomap_start[idx].fh = 0; > - zpci_iomap_start[idx].bar = 0; > + /* Detect underrun */ > +...

.../ifcvf/ifcvf_base.c | 2 -- drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c | 2 -- 2 files changed, 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.c b/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.c index b61b06ea26d3..e24371d644b5 100644 --- a/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.c +++ b/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.c @@ -301,12 +301,10 @@ int ifcvf_set_vq_state(struct ifcvf_hw *hw, u16 qid, u64 num) static int ifcvf_hw_enable(struct ifcvf_hw *hw) { - struct ifcvf_lm_cfg __iomem *ifcvf_lm; struct virtio_pci_common_cfg __iomem *cfg; struct ifcvf_adapter *ifcvf; u32 i; - ifcvf_lm = (struct ifcvf_lm_cfg __iomem...

...PORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_iomap); +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_iomap_range); + +void __iomem *pci_iomap(struct pci_dev *dev, int bar, unsigned long maxlen) +{ + return pci_iomap_range(dev, bar, 0, maxlen); +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL(pci_iomap); void pci_iounmap(struct pci_dev *pdev, void __iomem *addr) { @@ -285,8 +301,12 @@ void pci_iounmap(struct pci_dev *pdev, void __iomem *addr) idx = (((__force u64) addr) & ~ZPCI_IOMAP_ADDR_BASE) >> 48; spin_lock(&zpci_iomap_lock); - zpci_iomap_start[idx].fh = 0; - zpci_iomap_start[idx].bar = 0; + /* Detect underrun */ + BUG_ON(!zpci_iomap_start[idx].coun...

...PORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_iomap); +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_iomap_range); + +void __iomem *pci_iomap(struct pci_dev *dev, int bar, unsigned long maxlen) +{ + return pci_iomap_range(dev, bar, 0, maxlen); +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL(pci_iomap); void pci_iounmap(struct pci_dev *pdev, void __iomem *addr) { @@ -285,8 +301,12 @@ void pci_iounmap(struct pci_dev *pdev, void __iomem *addr) idx = (((__force u64) addr) & ~ZPCI_IOMAP_ADDR_BASE) >> 48; spin_lock(&zpci_iomap_lock); - zpci_iomap_start[idx].fh = 0; - zpci_iomap_start[idx].bar = 0; + /* Detect underrun */ + BUG_ON(!zpci_iomap_start[idx].coun...

...PORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_iomap); +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_iomap_range); + +void __iomem *pci_iomap(struct pci_dev *dev, int bar, unsigned long maxlen) +{ + return pci_iomap_range(dev, bar, 0, maxlen); +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL(pci_iomap); void pci_iounmap(struct pci_dev *pdev, void __iomem *addr) { @@ -285,8 +301,12 @@ void pci_iounmap(struct pci_dev *pdev, void __iomem *addr) idx = (((__force u64) addr) & ~ZPCI_IOMAP_ADDR_BASE) >> 48; spin_lock(&zpci_iomap_lock); - zpci_iomap_start[idx].fh = 0; - zpci_iomap_start[idx].bar = 0; + /* Detect underrun */ + BUG_ON(!zpci_iomap_start[idx].coun...

...PORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_iomap); +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_iomap_range); + +void __iomem *pci_iomap(struct pci_dev *dev, int bar, unsigned long maxlen) +{ + return pci_iomap_range(dev, bar, 0, maxlen); +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL(pci_iomap); void pci_iounmap(struct pci_dev *pdev, void __iomem *addr) { @@ -285,8 +301,12 @@ void pci_iounmap(struct pci_dev *pdev, void __iomem *addr) idx = (((__force u64) addr) & ~ZPCI_IOMAP_ADDR_BASE) >> 48; spin_lock(&zpci_iomap_lock); - zpci_iomap_start[idx].fh = 0; - zpci_iomap_start[idx].bar = 0; + /* Detect underrun */ + BUG_ON(!zpci_iomap_start[idx].coun...

...as EXPORT_SYMBOL looks like we > should use that too. > > Regards, > Sebastian OK, so you want two patches: one with new functionality, one switching to EXPORT_SYMBOL? > > > > void pci_iounmap(struct pci_dev *pdev, void __iomem *addr) > > { > > @@ -285,8 +301,12 @@ void pci_iounmap(struct pci_dev *pdev, void __iomem *addr) > > > > idx = (((__force u64) addr) & ~ZPCI_IOMAP_ADDR_BASE) >> 48; > > spin_lock(&zpci_iomap_lock); > > - zpci_iomap_start[idx].fh = 0; > > - zpci_iomap_start[idx].bar = 0; > > +...

...as EXPORT_SYMBOL looks like we > should use that too. > > Regards, > Sebastian OK, so you want two patches: one with new functionality, one switching to EXPORT_SYMBOL? > > > > void pci_iounmap(struct pci_dev *pdev, void __iomem *addr) > > { > > @@ -285,8 +301,12 @@ void pci_iounmap(struct pci_dev *pdev, void __iomem *addr) > > > > idx = (((__force u64) addr) & ~ZPCI_IOMAP_ADDR_BASE) >> 48; > > spin_lock(&zpci_iomap_lock); > > - zpci_iomap_start[idx].fh = 0; > > - zpci_iomap_start[idx].bar = 0; > > +...

...these interfaces as EXPORT_SYMBOL, we could change all of them in an extra patch. With this change integrated you can add Acked-by: Sebastian Ott <sebott at linux.vnet.ibm.com> Regards, Sebastian > > void pci_iounmap(struct pci_dev *pdev, void __iomem *addr) > { > @@ -285,8 +301,12 @@ void pci_iounmap(struct pci_dev *pdev, void __iomem *addr) > > idx = (((__force u64) addr) & ~ZPCI_IOMAP_ADDR_BASE) >> 48; > spin_lock(&zpci_iomap_lock); > - zpci_iomap_start[idx].fh = 0; > - zpci_iomap_start[idx].bar = 0; > + /* Detect underrun */ > +...

...these interfaces as EXPORT_SYMBOL, we could change all of them in an extra patch. With this change integrated you can add Acked-by: Sebastian Ott <sebott at linux.vnet.ibm.com> Regards, Sebastian > > void pci_iounmap(struct pci_dev *pdev, void __iomem *addr) > { > @@ -285,8 +301,12 @@ void pci_iounmap(struct pci_dev *pdev, void __iomem *addr) > > idx = (((__force u64) addr) & ~ZPCI_IOMAP_ADDR_BASE) >> 48; > spin_lock(&zpci_iomap_lock); > - zpci_iomap_start[idx].fh = 0; > - zpci_iomap_start[idx].bar = 0; > + /* Detect underrun */ > +...

...method(so, tesla, NV50TCL_FP_CTRL_UNK196C, 1); so_data (so, p->cfg.regs[3]); diff --git a/src/gallium/drivers/nv50/nv50_screen.c b/src/gallium/drivers/nv50/nv50_screen.c index 5a1efd3..16f22a8 100644 --- a/src/gallium/drivers/nv50/nv50_screen.c +++ b/src/gallium/drivers/nv50/nv50_screen.c @@ -301,13 +301,12 @@ nv50_screen_create(struct pipe_winsys *ws, struct nouveau_device *dev) so_data (so, 1); so_method(so, screen->tesla, NV50TCL_DMA_NOTIFY, 1); so_data (so, screen->sync->handle); - so_method(so, screen->tesla, NV50TCL_DMA_UNK0(0), - NV50TCL_DMA_UNK0__SIZE); -...

This is on top of 3.19 master + my bugfix patches, and adds virtio 1.0 support to virtio pci. This is 3.20 material I think. Would like to get feedback on s390 change as it's untested. Michael S Tsirkin (2): pci: add pci_iomap_range s390: add pci_iomap_range Michael S. Tsirkin (2): virtio_pci: modern driver virtio_pci: macros for PCI layout offsets. Rusty Russell (1): virtio-pci:

This is on top of 3.19 master + my bugfix patches, and adds virtio 1.0 support to virtio pci. This is 3.20 material I think. Would like to get feedback on s390 change as it's untested. Michael S Tsirkin (2): pci: add pci_iomap_range s390: add pci_iomap_range Michael S. Tsirkin (2): virtio_pci: modern driver virtio_pci: macros for PCI layout offsets. Rusty Russell (1): virtio-pci:

Changes since v2: handling for devices without config space (e.g. rng) reduce # of mappings for VQs These patches seem to work fine on my virtio-1.0 qemu branch. There haven't been any bugs since v2: just minor cleanups and enhancements. QEMU side is still undergoing polishing, but is already testable. Rusty, what do you think? Let's merge these for 3.20? Also - will you be doing that

Changes since v2: handling for devices without config space (e.g. rng) reduce # of mappings for VQs These patches seem to work fine on my virtio-1.0 qemu branch. There haven't been any bugs since v2: just minor cleanups and enhancements. QEMU side is still undergoing polishing, but is already testable. Rusty, what do you think? Let's merge these for 3.20? Also - will you be doing that

Hello, would it be possible to update config.sub and config.guess to the latest versions (or at least version from automake-1.13.1) in order to support new architectures based on the ARM 64 bit CPU? Patch: http://plautrba.fedorapeople.org/openssh/openssh-latest-config.sub-config.guess.patch Related Fedora bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=926284 Thanks, Petr

This is especially true when variables or functions are just called dsm without specifying the v1. Changes since v1: * Fix typo in commit explanation * Change has_dsm to has_mux in nouveau_dsm_detect Signed-off-by: Pierre Moreau <pierre.morrow at free.fr> --- drm/nouveau/nouveau_acpi.c | 72 +++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------- drm/nouveau/nouveau_acpi.h | 4 +--

Should call celt_inner_prod(). --- celt/bands.c | 7 ++++--- celt/bands.h | 2 +- celt/celt_encoder.c | 6 +++--- celt/pitch.c | 2 +- src/opus_multistream_encoder.c | 2 +- 5 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/celt/bands.c b/celt/bands.c index bbe8a4c..1ab24aa 100644 --- a/celt/bands.c +++ b/celt/bands.c