Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "3007ms".
Did you mean:
3000ms
2010 Jan 14
1
Lagged Extension
...ow Reachable. (9ms / 3000ms)
[Jan 14 06:45:04] NOTICE[29231] chan_sip.c: Peer '100' is now Lagged. (5008ms / 3000ms)
[Jan 14 06:45:14] NOTICE[29231] chan_sip.c: Peer '100' is now Reachable. (7ms / 3000ms)
[Jan 14 07:10:27] NOTICE[29231] chan_sip.c: Peer '100' is now Lagged. (3007ms / 3000ms)
[Jan 14 07:10:37] NOTICE[29231] chan_sip.c: Peer '100' is now Reachable. (8ms / 3000ms)
[Jan 14 07:20:37] NOTICE[29231] chan_sip.c: Peer '100' is now Lagged. (4007ms / 3000ms)
If I run a constant ping to that peer all looks fine:
PING 192.168.1.110 (192.168.1.110) 56(84)...
2013 Aug 02
1
[Bug 837] New: Large ICMP packets are lost
...oss, time 3000ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.069/0.080/0.091/0.010 ms
And then the problematic size:
$ ping -c 4 -s 3981 localhost
PING localhost.localdomain (127.0.0.1) 3981(4009) bytes of data.
--- localhost.localdomain ping statistics ---
4 packets transmitted, 0 received, 100% packet loss, time 3007ms
And verifying such large packet works without NFQUEUE:
# iptables -F
$ ping -c 4 -s 3981 localhost
PING localhost.localdomain (127.0.0.1) 3981(4009) bytes of data.
3989 bytes from localhost.localdomain (127.0.0.1): icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.028
ms
3989 bytes from localhost.localdomain (127.0.0.1)...