Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "30068".
Did you mean:
0068
2005 Feb 10
12
asterisk@home scary log
...0:00,
xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=relay, pri=30049, relay=[127.0.0.1]
[127.0.0.1], dsn=2.0.0, stat=Sent (j1A1U7mf010088 Message accepted for
delivery)
Feb 9 20:30:07 asterisk1 sendmail[10077]: j1A1U7CY010077:
to=paym3now@gmail.com, ctladdr=root (0/0), delay=00:00:00,
xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=relay, pri=30068, relay=[127.0.0.1]
[127.0.0.1], dsn=2.0.0, stat=Sent (j1A1U7Ns010089 Message accepted for
delivery)
Feb 9 20:30:17 asterisk1 sendmail[10094]: j1A1U7Ns010089:
to=<paym3now@gmail.com>, ctladdr=<root@asterisk1.local> (0/0),
delay=00:00:10, xdelay=00:00:10, mailer=esmtp, pri=30348,
relay=g...
2008 Sep 22
5
RAID / OS Monitoring tools ?
Hi List;
I just got a new server (my first **real** server).
It's a dell 2900 :
quad core XEON (with a spare slot for a 2nd quad core chip)
8G memory (expandable to 64G)
8 hot swap SATA HD slots onboard
PERC6i RAID controller
etc
I initially setup the system / RAID as follows:
1) booted off the dell setup CD
2) walked through the RAID setup and formatted the drives
3) the setup bombed
2007 Mar 26
5
Performance problem with CentOs 4.4 Samba
Hello
I experience performance problem with CentOs 4.4 Samba 3.0
Reading files from Samba (1 client WinXP) is 3 times slower than writing
to samba.
What should I look at?
OS je CentOS 4.4 (RHEL 4 U4)
# smbd --version
Version 3.0.10-1.4E.11
CFG
==================================================================
# cat /etc/samba/smb.conf
[global]
workgroup = GROUP
netbios name = SERVER
server
2007 Mar 16
1
CentOS samba MS Word corruption
We're using CentOS samba for about 20 workstations, mostly XP, some 2000 and
two win98. Samba shares a data directory with Word, Excel and Access
documents/db's. Also Exact for Dos is running from this share (executable and
data).
The users experience a long delay every morning opening the first Word
document (Word 97, Word 2000). This could take 10 minutes or so. If they
close
2014 Jan 28
3
[LLVMdev] MergeFunctions: reduce complexity to O(log(N))
Hi Stepan,
Sorry for the delay. It's great that you are working on MergeFunctions
as well and I agree, we should definitely try to combine our efforts to
improve MergeFunctions.
Just to give you some context, the pass (with the similar function
merging patch) is already being used in a production setting. From my
point of view, it would be better if we focus on improving its
capability
2014 Jan 30
3
[LLVMdev] MergeFunctions: reduce complexity to O(log(N))
...ialloc.ll 15 86903 0 0.01 86879 0 0.01 86879
iaparser.ll 74 137971 4 0.02 136825 1 0.02 137604
iascanner.ll 19 84100 0 0.02 84083 0 0.02 84083
id3tag.ll 4 36173 0 0.01 36142 0 0.01 36142
idct.ll 4 29032 0 0.01 28997 0 0.01 28997
idctref.ll 2 13404 0 0.01 13369 0 0.01 13369
idebug.ll 5 30092 0 0.01 30068 0 0.01 30068
idict.ll 10 43366 0 0.01 43342 0 0.01 43342
id.ll 0 4211 0 0.01 4194 0 0.01 4194
ieeefloat.ll 6 42929 0 0.01 42898 0 0.01 42898
iinit.ll 5 12359 0 0.01 12335 0 0.01 12335
image.ll 40 681667 0 0.06 681646 0 0.06 681646
img_chroma.ll 5 38306 0 0.01 38285 0 0.01 38285
img_luma.ll 10 12453...