search for: 3000148

...ing_up_Samba_as_a_Domain_Member I've read it several times, but i start to think that I simply don't understand the concepts. The old server does not have idmap config in the smb.conf (because it is a DC, right?). If I ls a file in the old fileserver, it looks like this: -rwxrwx---+ 1 3000148 users 31M sep 19 15:16 10160-101.zip So, 3000248 is a UID. If I use winbind 'rid' backend and copy the file above to the new server with rsync it will keep 3000148 as owner, but will 3000148 be connected to the same login on both servers? I think that I'll just add a testserver to...

...only on a Unix domain member. > > The old server does not have idmap config in the smb.conf (because it > is a DC, right?). You cannot use the 'idmap config' lines on a DC. > > > > If I ls a file in the old fileserver, it looks like this: > > -rwxrwx---+ 1 3000148 users 31M sep 19 15:16 10160-101.zip > > So, 3000248 is a UID. To be honest, it looks like an 'xidNumber', the '3000000' numbers normally only occur on a Samba AD DC, was the old fileserver a DC ? > > If I use winbind 'rid' backend and copy the file above to...

Hi So I added a second DC with the rfc2307 option. It replicates and I auth works. yay. >> Does this also mean that the member server that will act as a file >> server should have idmap config = ad? > Only if you have manually added uidNumber & gidNumber attributes to AD I belive the microsoft admin tools have always been used to add users and groups Is 'idmap

...>> probably not worth it, if the code is going. >> > The 'Failed to get machine token' message is coming from > py_ads_get_gpo_list() (libgpo/pygpo.c line 452). > I was referring to: add_local_groups: SID S-1-5-21-2112549936-2540803609-4198596461-1600 -> getpwuid(3000148) failed, is nsswitch configured? Which is coming from source3/auth/token_util.c Rowland

...ote-webmail), 3000058(NTDOMAIN\usb-lees-toegang),10003(NTDOMAIN\server-aftermath),10008(NTDOMAIN\servers-www),3000154(NTDOMAIN\remote-xenservers), 3000118(NTDOMAIN\cddvd-schrijf-toegang),3000030(NTDOMAIN\remote-toegang-pcs),3000117(NTDOMAIN\cddvd-lees-toegang),3000059(NTDOMAIN\usb-schrijf-toegang), 3000148(NTDOMAIN\gitslinux-gebruikers),3000043(NTDOMAIN\afd-itdep),3000173(NTDOMAIN\dnsadmins),3000038(NTDOMAIN\vest-rotterdam),3000039(NTDOMAIN\allen), 3000065(NTDOMAIN\vertrouwde-websites),3000040(NTDOMAIN\boven),3000004(NTDOMAIN\group policy creator owners),3000005(NTDOMAIN\denied rodc password replicat...

On 13/03/2023 17:19, David Mulder via samba wrote: > > On 3/13/23 11:14 AM, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: >> I was referring to: >> add_local_groups: SID S-1-5-21-2112549936-2540803609-4198596461-1600 >> -> getpwuid(3000148) failed, is nsswitch configured? >> >> Which is coming from source3/auth/token_util.c >> > That's not part of the traceback. I assumed it was just a red herring. > Possibly, but it is there and numerous users have asked about it. What you appear to be saying is that t...

...using the join/demote > procedure. Everything fine, but I see this ugly message in "journalctl -xe" > ----------- > > Mar 13 15:31:42 dc1 winbindd[482]:?? /usr/sbin/samba-gpupdate: > add_local_groups: SID S-1-5-21-2112549936-2540803609-4198596461-1600 -> > getpwuid(3000148) failed, is nsswitch configured? Is '1600' the RID for a computer ? If it is, I think I understand why the messages are occurring. On Windows, a computer is just a user, but with an extra objectclass and a few other differences, amongst which is the primary group (Domain Computers ins...

...ang),10003(NTDOMAIN\server- > aftermath),10008(NTDOMAIN\servers-www),3000154(NTDOMAIN\remote- > xenservers), > > 3000118(NTDOMAIN\cddvd-schrijf-toegang),3000030(NTDOMAIN\remote-toegang- > pcs),3000117(NTDOMAIN\cddvd-lees-toegang),3000059(NTDOMAIN\usb-schrijf- > toegang), > > 3000148(NTDOMAIN\gitslinux-gebruikers),3000043(NTDOMAIN\afd- > itdep),3000173(NTDOMAIN\dnsadmins),3000038(NTDOMAIN\vest- > rotterdam),3000039(NTDOMAIN\allen), > > 3000065(NTDOMAIN\vertrouwde- > websites),3000040(NTDOMAIN\boven),3000004(NTDOMAIN\group policy creator > owners),3000005(NTDOM...

27.06.2016 18:45, mathias dufresne: > Perhaps you don't have yet duplicate objectSid as that's not supposed to be > possible. > Rather than scripting something to look for objectSid used twice I would > start with dbcheck and other tools to verify that your database is > consistent and identical on all servers. [root at pdc ~]# samba-tool dbcheck Checking 3346 objects