search for: 3000045

...e until recently. Now, when several of the users create documents and folders on their "Desktop" (redirected to the DC) they are being created with UID 3000000, which is not a configured UID. For example: $ ls -ltrn "/redirectedFolders/Users/matkeson/My Documents" -rwxrwx---+ 1 3000045 100 27648 2015-07-30 07:17 Accounts\ 7-1-2015.docx* drwxrwx---+ 2 3000045 100 4096 2015-08-11 09:27 Correspondence/ -rwxrwx---+ 1 3000000 100 11423 2015-08-18 11:04 testMark.docx* This user's actual UID is 3000045, as created months ago via Windows RSAT. Confirmed by: $ wbinfo -i matkeson...

...uments and folders on > their > > "Desktop" (redirected to the DC) they are being created with UID > 3000000, which > > is not a configured UID. For example: > > > > $ ls -ltrn "/redirectedFolders/Users/matkeson/My Documents" > > -rwxrwx---+ 1 3000045 100 27648 2015-07-30 07:17 Accounts\ > 7-1-2015.docx* > > drwxrwx---+ 2 3000045 100 4096 2015-08-11 09:27 Correspondence/ > > -rwxrwx---+ 1 3000000 100 11423 2015-08-18 11:04 testMark.docx* > > > > This user's actual UID is 3000045, as created months ago via Windo...

...t;> "Desktop" (redirected to the DC) they are being created with UID >>> 3000000, which >>>> is not a configured UID. For example: >>>> >>>> $ ls -ltrn "/redirectedFolders/Users/matkeson/My Documents" >>>> -rwxrwx---+ 1 3000045 100 27648 2015-07-30 07:17 Accounts\ >>> 7-1-2015.docx* >>>> drwxrwx---+ 2 3000045 100 4096 2015-08-11 09:27 Correspondence/ >>>> -rwxrwx---+ 1 3000000 100 11423 2015-08-18 11:04 testMark.docx* >>>> >>>> This user's actual UID is 3000...

..." (redirected to the DC) they are being created with UID >>>> 3000000, which >>>>> is not a configured UID. For example: >>>>> >>>>> $ ls -ltrn "/redirectedFolders/Users/matkeson/My Documents" >>>>> -rwxrwx---+ 1 3000045 100 27648 2015-07-30 07:17 Accounts\ >>>> 7-1-2015.docx* >>>>> drwxrwx---+ 2 3000045 100 4096 2015-08-11 09:27 Correspondence/ >>>>> -rwxrwx---+ 1 3000000 100 11423 2015-08-18 11:04 testMark.docx* >>>>> >>>>> This user'...

...hen several of the users create documents and folders on their > "Desktop" (redirected to the DC) they are being created with UID 3000000, which > is not a configured UID. For example: > > $ ls -ltrn "/redirectedFolders/Users/matkeson/My Documents" > -rwxrwx---+ 1 3000045 100 27648 2015-07-30 07:17 Accounts\ 7-1-2015.docx* > drwxrwx---+ 2 3000045 100 4096 2015-08-11 09:27 Correspondence/ > -rwxrwx---+ 1 3000000 100 11423 2015-08-18 11:04 testMark.docx* > > This user's actual UID is 3000045, as created months ago via Windows RSAT. > Confirmed b...

...eing created with UID >>>>>> 3000000, which >>>>>>> is not a configured UID. For example: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> $ ls -ltrn "/redirectedFolders/Users/matkeson/My Documents" >>>>>>> -rwxrwx---+ 1 3000045 100 27648 2015-07-30 07:17 Accounts\ >>>>>> 7-1-2015.docx* >>>>>>> drwxrwx---+ 2 3000045 100 4096 2015-08-11 09:27 Correspondence/ >>>>>>> -rwxrwx---+ 1 3000000 100 11423 2015-08-18 11:04 testMark.docx* >>>>>>> &gt...

...t; their >> > "Desktop" (redirected to the DC) they are being created with UID >> 3000000, which >> > is not a configured UID. For example: >> > >> > $ ls -ltrn "/redirectedFolders/Users/matkeson/My Documents" >> > -rwxrwx---+ 1 3000045 100 27648 2015-07-30 07:17 Accounts\ >> 7-1-2015.docx* >> > drwxrwx---+ 2 3000045 100 4096 2015-08-11 09:27 Correspondence/ >> > -rwxrwx---+ 1 3000000 100 11423 2015-08-18 11:04 testMark.docx* >> > >> > This user's actual UID is 3000045, as created...

Hello! I have 2 Samba 4 server (4.3.3) as VC and other Samba 4 (4.3) as Fileserver, until now all ok, but I'm one doubts, how to validate that in both servers the domain IDs of the users of this identical, a simple way to do this validation? I wanted to make sure it is a DC die fileserver has to go 100%. thank you

...t; "Desktop" (redirected to the DC) they are being created with UID >>> 3000000, which >>> > is not a configured UID. For example: >>> > >>> > $ ls -ltrn "/redirectedFolders/Users/matkeson/My Documents" >>> > -rwxrwx---+ 1 3000045 100 27648 2015-07-30 07:17 Accounts\ >>> 7-1-2015.docx* >>> > drwxrwx---+ 2 3000045 100 4096 2015-08-11 09:27 Correspondence/ >>> > -rwxrwx---+ 1 3000000 100 11423 2015-08-18 11:04 testMark.docx* >>> > >>> > This user's actual UID is...

...; (redirected to the DC) they are being created with UID > >>> 3000000, which > >>>> is not a configured UID. For example: > >>>> > >>>> $ ls -ltrn "/redirectedFolders/Users/matkeson/My Documents" > >>>> -rwxrwx---+ 1 3000045 100 27648 2015-07-30 07:17 Accounts\ > >>> 7-1-2015.docx* > >>>> drwxrwx---+ 2 3000045 100 4096 2015-08-11 09:27 Correspondence/ > >>>> -rwxrwx---+ 1 3000000 100 11423 2015-08-18 11:04 testMark.docx* > >>>> > >>>> This user...

...DC) they are being created with UID > >>>> 3000000, which > >>>>> is not a configured UID. For example: > >>>>> > >>>>> $ ls -ltrn "/redirectedFolders/Users/matkeson/My Documents" > >>>>> -rwxrwx---+ 1 3000045 100 27648 2015-07-30 07:17 Accounts\ > >>>> 7-1-2015.docx* > >>>>> drwxrwx---+ 2 3000045 100 4096 2015-08-11 09:27 Correspondence/ > >>>>> -rwxrwx---+ 1 3000000 100 11423 2015-08-18 11:04 testMark.docx* > >>>>> > >>&g...

...; 3000000, which >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> is not a configured UID. For example: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> $ ls -ltrn "/redirectedFolders/Users/matkeson/My Documents" >>>>>>>> -rwxrwx---+ 1 3000045 100 27648 2015-07-30 07:17 Accounts\ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> 7-1-2015.docx* >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> drwxrwx---+ 2 3000045 100 4096 2015-08-11 09:27 Correspondence/ >>>>>>>> -rwxrwx---+ 1 3000000 1...

Rowland, Thank you for the quick response. I have just run net cache flush no change in problem. I have dumped the idmap.ldp using ldbsearch -H /var/lib/samba/private/idmap.ldb > idmap.txt and did some sorting, that is how I found the duplicates. On 1/13/2017 11:09 AM, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > samba-tool ntacl > >sysvolreset

...> On your memberservers this will be mapped by winbind(d) > EX: > > [root at s4master ~]# id tester > uid=90000(TPLK\tester) gid=100(users) > Gruppen=100(users),3000051(TPLK\TerminalServer > User),3000027(TPLK\Dienstplan),3000028(TPLK\Direktionv),3000048(TPLK\Schre > iben),3000045(TPLK\pflege),3000038(TPLK\orbis),3000023(TPLK\agfa),3000033( > TPLK\HS3) > > [root at s4slave ~]# id tester > uid=90000(TPLK\tester) gid=100(users) > Gruppen=100(users),3000051(TPLK\TerminalServer > User),3000027(TPLK\Dienstplan),3000028(TPLK\Direktionv),3000048(TPLK\Schre > i...

...-1768301897-3342589593-1064908849-502 >>>>> cn: S-1-5-21-1768301897-3342589593-1064908849-502 >>>>> objectClass: sidMap >>>>> objectSid: S-1-5-21-1768301897-3342589593-1064908849-502 >>>>> type: ID_TYPE_BOTH >>>>> xidNumber: 3000045 >>>>> distinguishedName: >>>>> CN=S-1-5-21-1768301897-3342589593-1064908849-502 >>>>> >>>>> As you can see, it maps a user/groups SID to an xidNumber. So I >>>>> see no problem with just using the xidNumber for another SID w...

...gt; EX: > >> > >> [root at s4master ~]# id tester > >> uid=90000(TPLK\tester) gid=100(users) > >> Gruppen=100(users),3000051(TPLK\TerminalServer > >> > User),3000027(TPLK\Dienstplan),3000028(TPLK\Direktionv),3000048(TPLK\Schre > >> > iben),3000045(TPLK\pflege),3000038(TPLK\orbis),3000023(TPLK\agfa),3000033( > >> TPLK\HS3) > >> > >> [root at s4slave ~]# id tester > >> uid=90000(TPLK\tester) gid=100(users) > >> Gruppen=100(users),3000051(TPLK\TerminalServer > >> > User),3000027(TPLK\Dien...

...oot at s4master ~]# id tester > >>>> uid=90000(TPLK\tester) gid=100(users) > >>>> Gruppen=100(users),3000051(TPLK\TerminalServer > >>>> > >> > User),3000027(TPLK\Dienstplan),3000028(TPLK\Direktionv),3000048(TPLK\Schre > >> > iben),3000045(TPLK\pflege),3000038(TPLK\orbis),3000023(TPLK\agfa),3000033( > >>>> TPLK\HS3) > >>>> > >>>> [root at s4slave ~]# id tester > >>>> uid=90000(TPLK\tester) gid=100(users) > >>>> Gruppen=100(users),3000051(TPLK\TerminalServer &g...

...t;>>>>>> cn: S-1-5-21-1768301897-3342589593-1064908849-502 >>>>>>> objectClass: sidMap >>>>>>> objectSid: S-1-5-21-1768301897-3342589593-1064908849-502 >>>>>>> type: ID_TYPE_BOTH >>>>>>> xidNumber: 3000045 >>>>>>> distinguishedName: >>>>>>> CN=S-1-5-21-1768301897-3342589593-1064908849-502 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> As you can see, it maps a user/groups SID to an xidNumber. So I >>>>>>> see no problem with ju...

...>> [root at s4master ~]# id tester >>>>>> uid=90000(TPLK\tester) gid=100(users) >>>>>> Gruppen=100(users),3000051(TPLK\TerminalServer >>>>>> >> User),3000027(TPLK\Dienstplan),3000028(TPLK\Direktionv),3000048(TPLK\Schre >> iben),3000045(TPLK\pflege),3000038(TPLK\orbis),3000023(TPLK\agfa),3000033( >>>>>> TPLK\HS3) >>>>>> >>>>>> [root at s4slave ~]# id tester >>>>>> uid=90000(TPLK\tester) gid=100(users) >>>>>> Gruppen=100(users),3000051(TPLK\Te...

...l ntacl > > >sysvolreset > > OK, idmap.ldb contains records like this: dn: CN=S-1-5-21-1768301897-3342589593-1064908849-502 cn: S-1-5-21-1768301897-3342589593-1064908849-502 objectClass: sidMap objectSid: S-1-5-21-1768301897-3342589593-1064908849-502 type: ID_TYPE_BOTH xidNumber: 3000045 distinguishedName: CN=S-1-5-21-1768301897-3342589593-1064908849-502 As you can see, it maps a user/groups SID to an xidNumber. So I see no problem with just using the xidNumber for another SID when you have duplicates, but I would try this instead. Stop Samba, backup idmap.ldb and then delete both...