search for: 3000025

Dear, I have 2 DC's Samba4.4.5. I realize that there is a difference in mapping groups gid mappings. The /etc/nsswitch.conf are equal in DC's. I found difference in the smb.conf of DC's. The DC2 shows the name of winbind groups. The DC1 shows only the uid of the group / user. Could someone give me a hint? Smb.conf file DC1 [global] interfaces = lo eth0 netbios name = SRV14

...tfacl /usr/local/samba/var/locks/sysvol/domain.local/Policies/\{31B2F340-016D-11D2-945F-00C04FB984F9\}/ getfacl: Removing leading '/' from absolute path names # file: usr/local/samba/var/locks/sysvol/domain.local/Policies/{31B2F340-016D-11D2-945F-00C04FB984F9}/ # owner: 3000000 # group: 3000025 user::rwx user:3000012:r-x user:3000025:rwx user:3000026:r-x group::rwx group:3000000:rwx group:3000012:r-x group:3000025:rwx group:3000026:r-x mask::rwx other::--- default:user::rwx default:user:3000000:rwx default:user:3000012:r-x default:user:3000025:rwx default:user:3000026:r-x...

...ted' group. Clearly, in an DC, a xID get assigned to group: root at vdcsv1:~# getent group Restricted LNFFVG\restricted:x:3000026: but by the same way 'mta' user get by default the 'Domain Users' group (and others, seems): root at vdcsv1:~# getent passwd mta LNFFVG\mta:*:3000025:10513:MTA Restricted:/home/mta:/bin/bash root at vdcsv1:~# id mta uid=3000025(LNFFVG\mta) gid=10513(LNFFVG\domain users) gruppi=10513(LNFFVG\domain users),3000025(LNFFVG\mta),3000026(LNFFVG\restricted),3000009(BUILTIN\users) Ok, some question: a) it make sense to modify the 'primaryGroupID:...

...SAMBA-01 ~]# ls -ld /var/samba4/BROCKLEY-2016/PROFILES/lyneak_hll.V2 drwxrwx---+ 16 BROCKLEY-2016\lyneak_hll BROCKLEY-2016\domain admins 512 Aug 12 17:07 /var/samba4/BROCKLEY-2016/PROFILES/lyneak_hll.V2 [root at SAMBA-01 ~]# ls -ldn /var/samba4/BROCKLEY-2016/PROFILES/lyneak_hll.V2 drwxrwx---+ 16 3000025 3000008 512 Aug 12 17:07 /var/samba4/BROCKLEY-2016/PROFILES/lyneak_hll.V2 On the new domain ls shows this: ls -ld /var/samba4/BROCKLEY/PROFILES/lyneak_hll.V2 drwxrwx--- 16 3000025 3000008 25 Jul 24 17:24 /var/samba4/BROCKLEY/PROFILES/lyneak_hll.V2 But on the new domain controller ls shows t...

...assigned to group: > > root at vdcsv1:~# getent group Restricted > LNFFVG\restricted:x:3000026: > > but by the same way 'mta' user get by default the 'Domain Users' group > (and others, seems): > > root at vdcsv1:~# getent passwd mta > LNFFVG\mta:*:3000025:10513:MTA Restricted:/home/mta:/bin/bash > root at vdcsv1:~# id mta > uid=3000025(LNFFVG\mta) gid=10513(LNFFVG\domain users) > gruppi=10513(LNFFVG\domain > users),3000025(LNFFVG\mta),3000026(LNFFVG\restricted),3000009(BUILTIN\users) > > Ok, some question: > > a) it make...

...-------------------------- But my nsswitch.conf is configured to use winbind: grep win /etc/nsswitch.conf passwd: files winbind shadow: files winbind group: files winbind And that works: For users: id administrator uid=0(root) gid=0(root) groupes=0(root) For computers: id dc200$ uid=3000025(AD.DGFIP\dc200$) gid=3000011(AD.DGFIP\domain controllers) groupes=3000011(AD.DGFIP\domain controllers),3000025(AD.DGFIP\dc200$),3000002(AD.DGFIP\denied rodc password replication group) So idmapping seems to be enabled by default as there are no UID/GID declared on DC200 computer: ldbsearch -H $sam...

I've got this on the backup DC root at bdc:~# wbinfo --sid-to-gid S-1-5-21-1166961617-3197558402-3341820450-516 3000000 while root at bdc:~# ldbedit -H /usr/local/samba/private/idmap.ldb objectsid=S-1-5-21-1166961617-3197558402-3341820450-516 shows correct xid 3000019 and on the primary DC I've got itk at dc:/$ wbinfo --sid-to-gid S-1-5-21-1166961617-3197558402-3341820450-516 3000019

...; DC, I just have DC's) if I > run 'wbinfo --name-to-sid=Domain\ Controllers' , I get: > > S-1-5-21-2025076216-3455336656-3842161122-516 SID_DOM_GROUP (2) > > If I then run 'wbinfo > --sid-to-gid=S-1-5-21-2025076216-3455336656-3842161122-516' , I get: > > 3000025 > > But if I run the same command on my other DC, I get: > > 3000021 > > This is because idmap.ldb is not replicated between DC's . This can be > checked by running 'ldbedit -e nano -H /var/lib/samba/private/idmap.ldb' > on both machines and then searching for th...

...roups. The problem come with the computer accounts of Windows machine. Because as the accounts are created from clients, I have no control on the ID generation. How the problem appear : ----------------------------------- -> I create a user "myuser" on DC1. -> A local xidNumber = 3000025 (for example) is created locally and copied to the rfc2307 attributes. -> On the others DCs, there is no local xidNumber for "myuser" because the rfc2307 attribute is already set. -> Next I join a new Windows computer on the Domain. -> On DC1, no problem, the local xidNumber prev...

...itch.conf >> passwd: files winbind >> shadow: files winbind >> group: files winbind >> >> And that works: >> For users: >> id administrator >> uid=0(root) gid=0(root) groupes=0(root) >> For computers: >> id dc200$ >> uid=3000025(AD.DGFIP\dc200$) gid=3000011(AD.DGFIP\domain controllers) >> groupes=3000011(AD.DGFIP\domain >> controllers),3000025(AD.DGFIP\dc200$),3000002(AD.DGFIP\denied rodc >> password >> replication group) >> >> So idmapping seems to be enabled by default as there are no...

Caming from Samba in NT mode with OpenLDAP backend i've created a bunch of ''things'' (apps, web tools, ...; but also printers and so on) that rely on reading ''public'' data in LDAP. With OpenLDAP ''public'' was a easy concept: anonymous access was the default, and ACL protect more sensitive data (mostly, passwords). Now i've to redo some

...al/samba/var/locks/sysvol/domain.local/Policies/\{31B2F340-016D-11D2-945F-00C04FB984F9\}/GPT.INI getfacl: Removing leading '/' from absolute path names # file: usr/local/samba/var/locks/sysvol/domain.local/Policies/{31B2F340-016D-11D2-945F-00C04FB984F9}/GPT.INI # owner: 3000000 # group: 3000025 user::rwx user:3000012:r-x user:3000025:rwx user:3000026:r-x group::rwx group:users:r-x group:3000000:rwx group:3000012:r-x group:3000025:rwx group:3000026:r-x mask::rwx other::--- # getfacl /usr/local/samba/var/locks/sysvol/ getfacl: Removing leading '/' from absolute path...

...9;primary' or a 'backup' DC, I just have DC's) if I run 'wbinfo --name-to-sid=Domain\ Controllers' , I get: S-1-5-21-2025076216-3455336656-3842161122-516 SID_DOM_GROUP (2) If I then run 'wbinfo --sid-to-gid=S-1-5-21-2025076216-3455336656-3842161122-516' , I get: 3000025 But if I run the same command on my other DC, I get: 3000021 This is because idmap.ldb is not replicated between DC's . This can be checked by running 'ldbedit -e nano -H /var/lib/samba/private/idmap.ldb' on both machines and then searching for the relevant xidNumber. On the first...

...ed to use winbind: > grep win /etc/nsswitch.conf > passwd: files winbind > shadow: files winbind > group: files winbind > > And that works: > For users: > id administrator > uid=0(root) gid=0(root) groupes=0(root) > For computers: > id dc200$ > uid=3000025(AD.DGFIP\dc200$) gid=3000011(AD.DGFIP\domain controllers) > groupes=3000011(AD.DGFIP\domain > controllers),3000025(AD.DGFIP\dc200$),3000002(AD.DGFIP\denied rodc password > replication group) > > So idmapping seems to be enabled by default as there are no UID/GID > declared on DC20...

On 03/23/2016 03:12 PM, Sébastien Le Ray wrote: > And did you add those IDs to the sysvol share permissions? > I guess you used samba-tool since I cannot find any gid/uid fields in RSAT I added them using LAM, because yes: using RSAT i also could not. (lam: www.ldap-account-manager.org/)

...es winbind > >>>> > >>>> And that works: > >>>> For users: > >>>> id administrator > >>>> uid=0(root) gid=0(root) groupes=0(root) > >>>> For computers: > >>>> id dc200$ > >>>> uid=3000025(AD.DGFIP\dc200$) gid=3000011(AD.DGFIP\domain controllers) > >>>> groupes=3000011(AD.DGFIP\domain > >>>> controllers),3000025(AD.DGFIP\dc200$),3000002(AD.DGFIP\denied rodc > >>>> password > >>>> replication group) > >>>> >...

...bind >>> shadow: files winbind >>> group: files winbind >>> >>> And that works: >>> For users: >>> id administrator >>> uid=0(root) gid=0(root) groupes=0(root) >>> For computers: >>> id dc200$ >>> uid=3000025(AD.DGFIP\dc200$) gid=3000011(AD.DGFIP\domain controllers) >>> groupes=3000011(AD.DGFIP\domain >>> controllers),3000025(AD.DGFIP\dc200$),3000002(AD.DGFIP\denied rodc >>> password >>> replication group) >>> >>> So idmapping seems to be enabled by...

...Number: 3000010 xidNumber: 65534 xidNumber: 3000031 xidNumber: 3000022 xidNumber: 3000026 xidNumber: 3000017 xidNumber: 3000027 xidNumber: 3000016 xidNumber: 3000030 xidNumber: 3000021 xidNumber: 3000004 xidNumber: 100 xidNumber: 3000008 xidNumber: 3000011 xidNumber: 0 xidNumber: 3000009 xidNumber: 3000025 xidNumber: 3000000 xidNumber: 3000001 xidNumber: 3000002 xidNumber: 3000014 xidNumber: 3000029 xidNumber: 3000020 xidNumber: 3000005 xidNumber: 3000006 xidNumber: 3000007 xidNumber: 3000018 xidNumber: 3000012 xidNumber: 3000024 xidNumber: 3000015 Is an xid number supposed to go all the way down to...

Colleagues, I come to seek help to solve this problem. I use Samba 4.4.5. I'm getting errors when running gpupdate / force on local desktops. I get the following error: User policy could not be updated successfully. The following errors were encountered: The processing of Group Policy failed. Windows could not apply the registry-based policy settings for the Group Policy object

...>>> For users: > >>>>>>>> id administrator > >>>>>>>> uid=0(root) gid=0(root) groupes=0(root) > >>>>>>>> For computers: > >>>>>>>> id dc200$ > >>>>>>>> uid=3000025(AD.DGFIP\dc200$) gid=3000011(AD.DGFIP\domain > >> controllers) > >>>>>>>> groupes=3000011(AD.DGFIP\domain > >>>>>>>> controllers),3000025(AD.DGFIP\dc200$),3000002(AD.DGFIP\denied > rodc > >>>>>>>> password...