search for: 3000006

...ies/{31B2F340-016D-11D2-945F-00C04FB984F9} getfacl: Removing leading '/' from absolute path names # file: usr/local/samba/var/locks/sysvol/mydomain.com/Policies/{31B2F340-016D-11D2-945F-00C04FB984F9} # owner: root # group: 10013 user::rwx user:root:rwx user:3000002:rwx user:3000003:r-x user:3000006:rwx user:3000010:r-x group::rwx group:10013:rwx group:10014:r-x group:3000002:rwx group:3000003:r-x group:3000006:rwx group:3000010:r-x mask::rwx other::--- default:user::rwx default:user:root:rwx default:user:3000002:rwx default:user:3000003:r-x default:user:3000006:rwx default:user:3000010:r-x de...

...acl: Removing leading '/' from absolute path names # file: > usr/local/samba/var/locks/sysvol/mydomain.com/Policies/{31B2F340-016D- > 11D2-945F-00C04FB984F9} > # owner: root > # group: 10013 > user::rwx > user:root:rwx > user:3000002:rwx > user:3000003:r-x > user:3000006:rwx > user:3000010:r-x > group::rwx > group:10013:rwx > group:10014:r-x > group:3000002:rwx > group:3000003:r-x > group:3000006:rwx > group:3000010:r-x > mask::rwx > other::--- > default:user::rwx > default:user:root:rwx > default:user:3000002:rwx > default...

On 1/12/2017 2:09 PM, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Thu, 12 Jan 2017 20:46:15 +0200 > Richard via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> Hi James >> >> The output is as follows... >> >> wbinfo --gid-info=10013 => CT\domain admins:x:10013: >> >> wbinfo --uid-info=3000008 => CT\domain >>

...244669724 blocks of size 1024. 235669456 blocks available Also, I've rerun getfacl and I see that GID 10013 still exists for both group and other, even though I have removed it from "domain admins" group::rwx group:10013:rwx group:10014:r-x group:3000002:rwx group:3000003:r-x group:3000006:rwx group:3000010:r-x mask::rwx other::--- default:user::rwx default:user:root:rwx default:user:3000002:rwx default:user:3000003:r-x default:user:3000006:rwx default:user:3000010:r-x default:group::--- default:group:10013:rwx default:group:10014:r-x default:group:3000002:rwx default:group:3000003:r...

...9} > getfacl: Removing leading '/' from absolute path names # file: usr/local/samba/var/locks/sysvol/mydomain.com/Policies/{31B2F340-016D-11D2-945F-00C04FB984F9} > # owner: root > # group: 10013 > user::rwx > user:root:rwx > user:3000002:rwx > user:3000003:r-x > user:3000006:rwx > user:3000010:r-x > group::rwx > group:10013:rwx > group:10014:r-x > group:3000002:rwx > group:3000003:r-x > group:3000006:rwx > group:3000010:r-x > mask::rwx > other::--- > default:user::rwx > default:user:root:rwx > default:user:3000002:rwx > default...

...available > > > Also, I've rerun getfacl and I see that GID 10013 still exists for both group and other, even though I have removed it from "domain admins" > > group::rwx > group:10013:rwx > group:10014:r-x > group:3000002:rwx > group:3000003:r-x > group:3000006:rwx > group:3000010:r-x > mask::rwx > other::--- > default:user::rwx > default:user:root:rwx > default:user:3000002:rwx > default:user:3000003:r-x > default:user:3000006:rwx > default:user:3000010:r-x > default:group::--- > default:group:10013:rwx > default:group...

...available > > > Also, I've rerun getfacl and I see that GID 10013 still exists for both group and other, even though I have removed it from "domain admins" > > group::rwx > group:10013:rwx > group:10014:r-x > group:3000002:rwx > group:3000003:r-x > group:3000006:rwx > group:3000010:r-x > mask::rwx > other::--- > default:user::rwx > default:user:root:rwx > default:user:3000002:rwx > default:user:3000003:r-x > default:user:3000006:rwx > default:user:3000010:r-x > default:group::--- > default:group:10013:rwx > default:group...

...so, I've rerun getfacl and I see that GID 10013 still exists for both group and other, even though I have removed it from "domain admins" >> >> group::rwx >> group:10013:rwx >> group:10014:r-x >> group:3000002:rwx >> group:3000003:r-x >> group:3000006:rwx >> group:3000010:r-x >> mask::rwx >> other::--- >> default:user::rwx >> default:user:root:rwx >> default:user:3000002:rwx >> default:user:3000003:r-x >> default:user:3000006:rwx >> default:user:3000010:r-x >> default:group::--- >&gt...

.... scp /var/lib/samba/private/idmap.ldb root at 192.168.0.2:/var/lib/samba/private/ ? started samba, and the id's where the same. ? Im using winbindd now with samba 4.2.1 but... ? DC1:? id administrator uid=0(root) gid=100(users) groups=0(root),100(users),3000004(group policy creator owners),3000006(enterprise admins), 3000008(domain admins),3000007(schema admins),3000005(denied rodc password replication group),3000009(BUILTIN\users), 3000000(BUILTIN\administrators) id administrator uid=0(root) gid=100(users) groups=0(root),100(users),3000011(group policy creator owners),3000010(enterprise ad...

...in 4.5? > > I do not know, you may have found a bug > > If I run 'id guest' on a Samba 4.6.x DC, I get this: > > uid=3000002(SAMDOM\guest) gid=10000(SAMDOM\domain users) > groups=10000(SAMDOM\domain > users),3000002(SAMDOM\guest),3000003(SAMDOM\domain > guests),3000006(BUILTIN\guests),3000001(BUILTIN\users) > > The 'uid' is correct, but, like you, the gid is set to 'Domain Users' > even though the 'guest' users primaryGroupID is '514' which is 'Domain > Guests' > >> >> Also in "winbind cha...

...ndd[32025]:?? Copyright Andrew Tridgell and the Samba Team 1992-2023 Nov 11 17:05:30 ceres smbd[32069]:?? chdir_current_service: vfs_ChDir(/var/lib/samba/sysvol) failed: Permission denied. Current token: uid=3000021, gid=3000016, 9 groups: 3000021 3000016 3000019 3000020 3000010 3000011 3000013 3000006 3000014 Nov 11 17:05:40 ceres smbd[32069]: [2024/11/11 17:05:40.355505, 0] ../../source3/smbd/smb2_service.c:117(chdir_current_service) Nov 11 17:05:40 ceres smbd[32069]:?? chdir_current_service: vfs_ChDir(/var/lib/samba/sysvol) failed: Permission denied. Current token: uid=3000021, gid=3000016,...

...ged anything on the DCs ? Are the winbind nss links in place > ? (not sure if this makes any difference, but I always create them) > > if I run 'id Administrator', I get: > > uid=0(root) gid=100(users) groups=0(root),100(users),3000004(SAMdom\Group > Policy Creator Owners),3000006(SAMDOM\Enterprise > Admins),3000008(SAMDOM\Domain Admins),3000007(SAMDOM\Schema Admins) > > 'getent password Administrator' returns: > > SAMDOM\Administrator:*:0:100::/home/Administrator:/bin/bash > > Rowland > > > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list go...

.../home from the server is mounted on the client via nfs. On the ubuntu box, users can authenticate, but cannot enter their /home folder. Making the folder recursively 0777 allows them access but any new file created has the wrong uid:gid On the server: wbinfo -i steve2 gives /home/CACTUS/steve2 3000006:100 and I can use smbclient to create folders that show 3000006:100 On the ubuntu client however, any new files created have uid:gid of 1481114100:1481114113 Can I eliminate Samba 4 from debugging this problem? If so, then can anyone narrow down which of likewise or nfs is the culprit and if...

...so, I've rerun getfacl and I see that GID 10013 still exists for both group and other, even though I have removed it from "domain admins" >> >> group::rwx >> group:10013:rwx >> group:10014:r-x >> group:3000002:rwx >> group:3000003:r-x >> group:3000006:rwx >> group:3000010:r-x >> mask::rwx >> other::--- >> default:user::rwx >> default:user:root:rwx >> default:user:3000002:rwx >> default:user:3000003:r-x >> default:user:3000006:rwx >> default:user:3000010:r-x >> default:group::--- >&gt...

I have Samba 4.5.3 working fine as an AD DC and DNS provider. I now need to set up a group policy on the DC but I am having problems with the internal sysvol and netlogon shares. Via the Windows Group Policy Manager snap-in I successfully created a GPO specifying the DC as the primary time source for all clients, using the Administrator user ...but my windows domain test client

...nd I see that GID 10013 still exists for both group and other, even though I have removed it from "domain admins" >>> >>> group::rwx >>> group:10013:rwx >>> group:10014:r-x >>> group:3000002:rwx >>> group:3000003:r-x >>> group:3000006:rwx >>> group:3000010:r-x >>> mask::rwx >>> other::--- >>> default:user::rwx >>> default:user:root:rwx >>> default:user:3000002:rwx >>> default:user:3000003:r-x >>> default:user:3000006:rwx >>> default:user:3000010:r-x...

Hai, ? Im having a strange thing with sernet samba 4.2.1 on debian wheezy. ? I installed 2 dc.s with my scripts. ? i did setup the sysvol replication and now im seeing the following when i create new policies. ? The default GPO's drwxrwx---+ 4 root????????? BUILTIN\administrators 4096 Apr 24 10:17 {31B2F340-016D-11D2-945F-00C04FB984F9} drwxrwx---+ 4 root????????? BUILTIN\administrators

>> If I do this (rely on the user map file containing "!root = >> BPN\Administrator BPN\administrator"), should I expect "id >> Administrator" to give anything? >> >> Ole >> > > Only a Samba AD DC, you will not get anything from 'getent > Administrator' on a Unix domain member, but remember, with the user > map

...nd I see that GID 10013 still exists for both group and other, even though I have removed it from "domain admins" >>> >>> group::rwx >>> group:10013:rwx >>> group:10014:r-x >>> group:3000002:rwx >>> group:3000003:r-x >>> group:3000006:rwx >>> group:3000010:r-x >>> mask::rwx >>> other::--- >>> default:user::rwx >>> default:user:root:rwx >>> default:user:3000002:rwx >>> default:user:3000003:r-x >>> default:user:3000006:rwx >>> default:user:3000010:r-x...

...up it own id's. Both the centos and fedora systems have the same idmap settings. idmap uid = 3000000-4000000 idmap gid = 3000000-4000000 samba 3.5.5 winbind and nss on fedora 13 workstation uid=3000000(jonnt) gid=3000004(domain users) groups=3000004(domain users),3000005(domain admins),3000006(denied rodc password replication group),3000007(vpn),3000006(denied rodc password replication group),16777216(BUILTIN+administrators) samba 3.5.5 winbind and nss on centos 5.5 file server uid=3000000(jonnt) gid=3000000(domain users) groups=3000000(domain users),3000001(domain admins),3000002(denie...