search for: 3.3

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 3424 matches for "3.3".

Did you mean: 0.3
2005 May 12
0
Using string from stdlib in winemaker
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 How can I use std::string in my winemaker project? If I do a #include <string> along with an #include <windows.h>, I get the following errors: - --- In file included from /usr/include/c++/3.3/i486-linux/bits/c++io.h:35, from /usr/include/c++/3.3/bits/fpos.h:44, from
2013 Mar 20
2
[LLVMdev] error: unable to get target for 'armv5', see --version and --triple.
Current llvm svn fails make check when built for only x86... [100%] Running the LLVM regression tests FAIL: LLVM :: DebugInfo/inlined-vars.ll (3994 of 7466) ******************** TEST 'LLVM :: DebugInfo/inlined-vars.ll' FAILED ******************** Script: -- /sw/src/fink.build/llvm33-3.3-0/llvm-3.3/build/bin/./llc -O0 <
2013 Jul 25
1
[LLVMdev] First Pass at building dragon egg-3.3 for clang 3.3 - using gcc-4.7
LLVM Friends, First time attempting a build of dragonegg, using our shiny new install of clang-3.3. I'm clearly off to a terrifying start! dragonegg-3.3.src$ CXX=/usr/bin/gcc GCC=/usr/bin/gcc ENABLE_LLVM_PLUGINS=1 LLVM_CONFIG=/usr/bin/llvm-config CFLAGS=-I/usr/clang/3.3/lib/clang/3.3/include CXXFLAGS="-I/usr/clang/3.3/lib/clang/3.3/include" make Compiling
2013 Aug 05
2
[LLVMdev] Many PPC64 failures with llvm 3.3
Hi, I am building llvm 3.3 with cmake on PPC64 and have a bunch of regression test failures. With only PPC backend enabled the list of failures is: [ 1553s] Failing Tests (20): [ 1553s] LLVM :: CodeGen/PowerPC/2007-05-22-tailmerge-3.ll [ 1553s] LLVM :: CodeGen/PowerPC/2007-09-08-unaligned.ll [ 1553s] LLVM :: CodeGen/PowerPC/2008-07-24-PPC64-CCBug.ll [ 1553s] LLVM ::
2013 Mar 20
0
[LLVMdev] error: unable to get target for 'armv5', see --version and --triple.
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 6:42 AM, Jack Howarth <howarth at bromo.med.uc.edu> wrote: > Current llvm svn fails make check when built for only x86... Ah, right, need to put that behind a "requires"... hrm. (or I could just drop it & let the machines that are armv5 native catch this) > > [100%] Running the LLVM regression tests > FAIL: LLVM ::
2013 Mar 20
1
[LLVMdev] error: unable to get target for 'armv5', see --version and --triple.
I hope this is addressed by r177545 - please let me know if this test is still failing for you after that change. On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 8:38 AM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 6:42 AM, Jack Howarth <howarth at bromo.med.uc.edu> wrote: >> Current llvm svn fails make check when built for only x86... > > Ah, right, need to put
2005 Jan 30
2
Rinternals.h and iostream don't play nice together'
Hi, Consider the following file. ******************************* foo.cc ******************************* #include <R.h> #include <Rinternals.h> #include <iostream> ******************************* R CMD SHLIB foo.cc gives scads of errors. I've use C++ extensively with R before (using C linkage) but not with Rinternals.h. I'm puzzled. The errors make no sense to me. Am
2013 Jul 25
1
[LLVMdev] First Pass at building dragon egg-3.3 for clang 3.3 - using gcc-4.7
Duncan, Many thanks for your comments. The core issue we're running into is this: $ GCC=/usr/bin/gcc LLVM_CONFIG=/usr/bin/llvm-config make Compiling utils/TargetInfo.cpp Linking TargetInfo ld: fatal: library -lLLVMSupport: not found ld: fatal: file processing errors. No output written to TargetInfo collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit statusAll other gyrations are attempts to shoehorn
2004 Jul 06
1
[LLVMdev] AsmWriter.cpp:255: error: ambiguous overload for `std::basic_ostream<char,...
Hi guys Is some one able to explain me, why these errors emerge: gmake[2]: Entering directory `/usr/local/src/llvm/lib/VMCore' Compiling AsmWriter.cpp AsmWriter.cpp: In function `void WriteConstantInt(std::ostream&, const llvm::Constant*, bool, std::map<const llvm::Type*, std::string, std::less<const llvm::Type*>, std::allocator<std::pair<const llvm::Type* const,
2004 Jul 06
2
[LLVMdev] AsmWriter.cpp:255: error: ambiguous overload for `std::basic_ostream<char,...
No, Chris, I'm not buying that argument, due to I've tweaked /usr/include/types.h a little bit, so the configuration and compilation of the cfrontend would be correct: /* * 64bit type for BSD compatability */ #ifdef __GNUC__ typedef long long int quad_t; typedef unsigned long long int u_quad_t; typedef long long int int64_t; typedef unsigned long long int u_int64_t;
2015 Aug 28
0
errors Interix 3.5 / xapian-core-1.2.21 / Eric Lindblad
Report by Eric Lindblad 28-08-2015 http://www.ericlindblad.blogspot.com As of Windows 8.1 MS has discontinued enabling for Interix, so perhaps there is little or no interest in this e-mail's subject matter. NB: As far as possible languages for xapian-bindings I only have be able to compile earlier versions of Tcl with a static library on Interix 3.5, Perl versions fail 'make check',
2015 Sep 05
1
question / errors Interix 3.5 / xapian-core-1.2.21 / Eric Lindblad
Question by Eric Lindblad 05-09-2015 http://www.ericlindblad.blogspot.com I would enquire if anyone has an opinion on whether it might be a possibility that adding the following #ifdef in certain xapian-core-1.2.21 /common and/or /backends files following the string #include <sys/types.h> might move closer towards resolution the 'ambiguous overload' issue. +#ifdef __INTERIX +#
2004 Jul 06
0
[LLVMdev] AsmWriter.cpp:255: error: ambiguous overload for `std::basic_ostream<char,...
On Wed, 7 Jul 2004, Henrik Bach wrote: > This tweak seems to work. > > As far as I can see, correct me if I'm wrong, it is the compiler, that can't > figure out which std::basic_ostream to use. Why? What I'm saying is that it appears that your implementation of operator<< is not functional or is missing. You said that you are using GCC on internix. Is it possible
2017 Sep 08
2
GlusterFS as virtual machine storage
The issue of I/O stopping may also be with glusterfsd not being properly killed before rebooting the server. For example in RHEL 7.4 with official Gluster 3.8.4, the glusterd service does *not* stop glusterfsd when you run systemctl stop glusterd So give this a try on the nose you wish to reboot: 1. Stop glusterd 2. Check if glusterfsd processes are still running. If they are, use: killall
2017 Sep 08
0
GlusterFS as virtual machine storage
Hi Diego, indeed glusterfsd processes are runnin and it is the reason I do server reboot instead of systemctl glusterd stop. Is killall different from reboot in a way glusterfsd processes are terminated in CentOS (init 1?)? However I will try this and let you know. -ps On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 12:19 PM, Diego Remolina <dijuremo at gmail.com> wrote: > The issue of I/O stopping may also
2017 Sep 08
1
GlusterFS as virtual machine storage
This is exactly the problem, Systemctl stop glusterd does *not* kill the brick processes. On CentOS with gluster 3.10.x there is also a service, meant to only stop glusterfsd (brick processes). I think the reboot process may not be properly stopping glusterfsd or network or firewall may be stopped before glusterfsd and so the nodes go into the long timeout. Once again , in my case a simple
2017 Sep 08
1
GlusterFS as virtual machine storage
If your VMs use ext4 also check this: https://joejulian.name/blog/keeping-your-vms-from-going- read-only-when-encountering-a-ping-timeout-in-glusterfs/ I asked him what to do for VMs using XFS and he said he could not find a fix (setting to change) for those. HTH, Diego On Sep 8, 2017 6:19 AM, "Diego Remolina" <dijuremo at gmail.com> wrote: > The issue of I/O stopping may
2017 Sep 08
0
GlusterFS as virtual machine storage
This is the qemu log of instance: [2017-09-08 09:31:48.381077] C [rpc-clnt-ping.c:160:rpc_clnt_ping_timer_expired] 0-gv_openstack_1-client-1: server 10.0.1.202:49152 has not responded in the last 1 seconds, disconnecting. [2017-09-08 09:31:48.382411] E [rpc-clnt.c:365:saved_frames_unwind] (--> /lib64/libglusterfs.so.0(_gf_log_callingfn+0x13b)[0x7fbcadb09e8b] (-->
2004 Jul 07
1
[LLVMdev] AsmWriter.cpp:255: error: ambiguous overload for `std::basic_ostream<char,...
Yes, Chris you're right. It seems that my << operator for int64_t is missing in my '/opt/gcc.3.3/include/c++/3.3/bits/ostream.tcc' file. Which ordinary version of GCC are you working with and how do your definition of the << operator for int64_t look like? /Henrik > >Here is an excerpt from the config.log for LLVM: > >configure:19451: checking for int64_t
2017 Sep 08
3
GlusterFS as virtual machine storage
I think this should be considered a bug If you have a server crash, glusterfsd process obviously doesn't exit properly and thus this could least to IO stop ? And server crashes are the main reason to use a redundant filesystem like gluster Il 8 set 2017 12:43 PM, "Diego Remolina" <dijuremo at gmail.com> ha scritto: This is exactly the problem, Systemctl stop glusterd does