Displaying 20 results from an estimated 42 matches for "3.16.1".
Did you mean:
3.1.1
2014 Sep 26
0
CESA-2014:1307 Important CentOS 6 nss Security Update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2014:1307 Important
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-1307.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
e5ed74d34ab7b95fbba83147d8203e51d55991989bb752b41fc9c584fe2b3a87 nss-3.16.1-7.el6_5.i686.rpm
2014 Jul 23
0
CESA-2014:0917 Critical CentOS 6 nss Update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2014:0917 Critical
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-0917.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
6a0fdf3e00f9594320ff6124ce53f9d4c6781500f7969c86ba248b3ef158b427 nss-3.16.1-4.el6_5.i686.rpm
2014 Sep 30
0
CESA-2014:1246 Moderate CentOS 5 nss Security Update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2014:1246 Moderate
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-1246.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
60e278dee01892265a85e4761efc0761d8c5fd4d4bfa5535fd48259d35056200 nss-3.16.1-2.el5.i386.rpm
2014 Sep 30
0
CESA-2014:1307 Important CentOS 5 nss Security Update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2014:1307 Important
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-1307.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
b88d8f6d29b38c20b2d9bf7e140a17875ee79802027ae9ca948d9e66c43bc015 nss-3.16.1-4.el5_11.i386.rpm
2014 Dec 03
5
Firefox fails to authenticate .mil sites with New DoD CAC
Can anyone help with getting the new DoD CACs (Smart Card) to work in
CentOS 6.6? I don't use it for console logins, only for email and .mil
web sites.
I recently had to get a new DoD CAC (Smart Card) when one of the
buildings I work in upgraded their security system. My old CAC was
working fine prior to this for signing and encrypting email and for
authenticating to various DoD (.mil) sites
2014 Jul 23
0
CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 113, Issue 9
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-announce at centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-request at centos.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
centos-announce-owner at centos.org
When
2014 Jul 23
0
CESA-2014:0917 Critical CentOS 6 nss-util Update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2014:0917 Critical
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-0917.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
8521972aa9ed897490eea2d40d26ad105d57884768978066c9c19bec216a7013 nss-util-3.16.1-1.el6_5.i686.rpm
2014 Dec 04
0
Firefox fails to authenticate .mil sites with New DoD CAC
On Thu, 2014-12-04 at 08:08 -0500, mark wrote:
> On 12/03/14 17:34, Cal Webster wrote:
> > Can anyone help with getting the new DoD CACs (Smart Card) to work in
> > CentOS 6.6? I don't use it for console logins, only for email and .mil
> > web sites.
> >
> > I recently had to get a new DoD CAC (Smart Card) when one of the
> > buildings I work in upgraded
2014 Sep 26
0
CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 115, Issue 16
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-announce at centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-request at centos.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
centos-announce-owner at centos.org
When
2014 Dec 04
0
Firefox fails to authenticate .mil sites with New DoD CAC
I thought DoD used RHEL and not Centos, or did Centos did approved
DADEMS recently?
On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 5:34 PM, Cal Webster <cwebster at ec.rr.com> wrote:
> Can anyone help with getting the new DoD CACs (Smart Card) to work in
> CentOS 6.6? I don't use it for console logins, only for email and .mil
> web sites.
>
> I recently had to get a new DoD CAC (Smart Card) when
2014 Dec 03
0
Firefox fails to authenticate .mil sites with New DoD CAC
> -----Original Message-----
> From: centos-bounces at centos.org
> [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of Cal Webster
> Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2014 17:35
> To: CentOS List
> Subject: [CentOS] Firefox fails to authenticate .mil sites
> with New DoD CAC
>
> Can anyone help with getting the new DoD CACs (Smart Card) to work in
> CentOS 6.6? I
2018 Jul 13
2
Firefix 60.10-5 ESR Install Problems For CentOS 6
Johnny/et al,
Looks like we've run into some issues with incompatible libs for the new
Firefox 60 ESR install:
> root at gs6102dsclxpub1:~# yum -y update firefox
> Loaded plugins: list-data, security
> Setting up Update Process
> group-centos-adobe | 2.9 kB???? 00:00
> group-centos-bigfix | 2.9 kB???? 00:00
> group-centos-epel | 3.0 kB???? 00:00
> group-centos-extras |
2015 Feb 15
2
[Bug 71455] Thermal management in nouveau running hot 3.12.0+ kernel
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71455
Evan Foss <evanfoss at gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |evanfoss at gmail.com
--- Comment #7 from Evan Foss <evanfoss at gmail.com> ---
Created attachment 113500
2009 Apr 23
2
xen and hwclock
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 TRANSITIONAL//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; CHARSET=UTF-8">
<META NAME="GENERATOR" CONTENT="GtkHTML/3.16.1">
</HEAD>
<BODY>
Hello All, I have a problem with hwclock on centos 5.3. in xen guest environment<FONT
2015 Feb 15
2
[Bug 71455] Thermal management in nouveau running hot 3.12.0+ kernel
On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 9:52 PM, Evan Foss <evanfoss at gmail.com> wrote:
> Sorry guys I did not understand how bugzilla's user interface works. this
> should be seperate from the thermal management bug..
>
> On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 9:51 PM, <bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org> wrote:
>
>> Evan Foss <evanfoss at gmail.com> changed bug 71455
>>
2020 Mar 26
12
Upgrading LLVM's minimum required CMake version
We had this discussion a few months ago and it petered out, and it’s recently been revived in the context of upgrading the CMake version specifically for libc++ (at which point people suggested upgrading the CMake version used by all of LLVM), so let’s try to move this forward.
Our current required minimum version is CMake 3.4.3, which was released on January 25th 2016. It’s interesting to note
2020 Mar 26
4
Upgrading LLVM's minimum required CMake version
On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 11:48 PM Nikita Popov via llvm-dev
<llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 9:07 PM Shoaib Meenai via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>>
>> We had this discussion a few months ago and it petered out, and it’s recently been revived in the context of upgrading the CMake version specifically for libc++ (at which
2014 Sep 15
7
[Bug 83897] New: GK106 (GeForce GTX 660): Frequent GPU lockups
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=83897
Priority: medium
Bug ID: 83897
Assignee: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org
Summary: GK106 (GeForce GTX 660): Frequent GPU lockups
QA Contact: xorg-team at lists.x.org
Severity: major
Classification: Unclassified
OS: Linux (All)
Reporter: freedesk.apriori at
2020 Apr 02
2
Upgrading LLVM's minimum required CMake version
Assuming this is a one-time version bump, this seems reasonable to me. Perhaps this goes without saying, but the warning for point 1 should only happen if you don’t have CMake >= 3.13.4 installed.
It sounded to me from your original message that you have an urgent need to upgrade to 3.8. Were you planning on going ahead with that right away?
From: llvm-dev <llvm-dev-bounces at
2020 Apr 02
2
Upgrading LLVM's minimum required CMake version
I’m in favor of all this. Thanks for volunteering! I’m happy to help out in whatever way.
Some things it might be worth figuring out for future upgrades:
* If we want to limit ourselves to CMake versions supported by LTS releases of distros, which distros should we consider, and how far back should we go (i.e. is it just the latest LTS or the last two LTS versions)?
* For platforms like Ubuntu