search for: 3.16

Package: blktap-dkms Version: 2.0.91-1 Severity: normal With both linux-image-3.2.0-4-amd64 and linux-image-3.16-2-amd64 installed, blktap fails to compile for the 3.16-2 kernel, but succeeds for the 3.2.0-4 kernel. (Contrary to the dependency listing below, I do have the headers for 3.16-2 installed.) I am attaching the build log. -- System Information: Debian Release: 7.6 APT prefers

Hi Amos On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 12:32:27PM +0800, Amos Kong wrote: > On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 06:51:47AM +0800, Amos Kong wrote: > > I received two mails about faile to apply patches to 3.16-stable tree: > > > > FAILED: patch "[PATCH] virtio-rng: skip reading when we start to remove the device" failed to apply to 3.16-stable tree > > FAILED: patch

Hi Amos On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 12:32:27PM +0800, Amos Kong wrote: > On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 06:51:47AM +0800, Amos Kong wrote: > > I received two mails about faile to apply patches to 3.16-stable tree: > > > > FAILED: patch "[PATCH] virtio-rng: skip reading when we start to remove the device" failed to apply to 3.16-stable tree > > FAILED: patch

I received two mails about faile to apply patches to 3.16-stable tree: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] virtio-rng: skip reading when we start to remove the device" failed to apply to 3.16-stable tree FAILED: patch "[PATCH] virtio-rng: fix stuck of hot-unplugging busy device" failed to apply to 3.16-stable tree Amit already backported two patches for 3.16-stable, then cherry-pick of my

I received two mails about faile to apply patches to 3.16-stable tree: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] virtio-rng: skip reading when we start to remove the device" failed to apply to 3.16-stable tree FAILED: patch "[PATCH] virtio-rng: fix stuck of hot-unplugging busy device" failed to apply to 3.16-stable tree Amit already backported two patches for 3.16-stable, then cherry-pick of my

On Wed, Nov 05, 2014 at 04:02:49PM +0000, Luis Henriques wrote: > Hi Amos > > On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 12:32:27PM +0800, Amos Kong wrote: > > On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 06:51:47AM +0800, Amos Kong wrote: > > > I received two mails about faile to apply patches to 3.16-stable tree: > > > > > > FAILED: patch "[PATCH] virtio-rng: skip reading when we start

On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 06:51:47AM +0800, Amos Kong wrote: > I received two mails about faile to apply patches to 3.16-stable tree: > > FAILED: patch "[PATCH] virtio-rng: skip reading when we start to remove the device" failed to apply to 3.16-stable tree > FAILED: patch "[PATCH] virtio-rng: fix stuck of hot-unplugging busy device" failed to apply to 3.16-stable

On 09/12/2014 01:54 PM, Ming Lei wrote: > On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 6:26 PM, Christian Borntraeger > <borntraeger at de.ibm.com> wrote: >> Folks, >> >> we have seen the following bug with 3.16 as a KVM guest. It suspect the blk-mq rework that happened between 3.15 and 3.16, but it can be something completely different. >> > > Care to share how you reproduce

On 09/12/2014 01:54 PM, Ming Lei wrote: > On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 6:26 PM, Christian Borntraeger > <borntraeger at de.ibm.com> wrote: >> Folks, >> >> we have seen the following bug with 3.16 as a KVM guest. It suspect the blk-mq rework that happened between 3.15 and 3.16, but it can be something completely different. >> > > Care to share how you reproduce

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=80506 Priority: medium Bug ID: 80506 Assignee: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org Summary: Video failed on resume from suspend - G94 / GeForce 9600 GT, 10de:0622 , kernel 3.16 rc2 QA Contact: xorg-team at lists.x.org Severity: major Classification: Unclassified

Just wondering if there is a way to get the gnome rebase stuff for gnome 3.8 to 3.16 now? (heard it was coming in 7.2) I'm playing with centos 7.1 and would like to use gnome 3.16. is there a way to start playing with that now? Thanks jerry

Hi guys, This is just to let you know that I'll be traveling starting Tuesday, July 8 and until July 27. I won't be able to attend the KVM developers conference call or other meetings, but I plan to check mail every 1-2 days so this should be transparent to you, and there should be no problem in case there are high priority bugfixes. However, please do the following to make it less likely

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=964 Summary: nft add table not working on kernel 3.16-rc1 Product: nftables Version: unspecified Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: kernel AssignedTo: pablo at netfilter.org ReportedBy:

Hi guys, This is just to let you know that I'll be traveling starting Tuesday, July 8 and until July 27. I won't be able to attend the KVM developers conference call or other meetings, but I plan to check mail every 1-2 days so this should be transparent to you, and there should be no problem in case there are high priority bugfixes. However, please do the following to make it less likely

Hi everyone, I've been asked to run a number of Wilcoxon tests on some behavioral data (below is a sample). They want me to compare each trial to the first trial, considered the control trial. I know I can use brackets to index and select, for example, trial 1 vs. trial 4 (not exactly sure how to set that up either) but it would save me a ton of time if there was a way to do all the

This is a 3.16-only patch. The linux.git fix is 5c06273401f2eb7b290cadbae18ee00f8f65e893, which fixes this issue in a different way. Amos reported using multiple virtio-rng devices cause boot to freeze even after the recent fixes. We need the probe_done test per device rather than just once for the driver. Reported-by: Amos Kong <akong at redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Amit Shah

This is a 3.16-only patch. The linux.git fix is 5c06273401f2eb7b290cadbae18ee00f8f65e893, which fixes this issue in a different way. Amos reported using multiple virtio-rng devices cause boot to freeze even after the recent fixes. We need the probe_done test per device rather than just once for the driver. Reported-by: Amos Kong <akong at redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Amit Shah

Hi everyone, I've been asked to run a number of Wilcoxon tests on some behavioral data (below is a sample). They want me to compare each trial to the first trial, considered the control trial. I know I can use brackets to index and select, for example, trial 1 vs. trial 4 (not exactly sure how to set that up either) but it would save me a ton of time if there was a way to do all the

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=84721 --- Comment #11 from r004 <roo4.id at gmail.com> --- (In reply to Krzysztof Katowicz-Kowalewski from comment #10) > As far as I've checked, the problem appeared in 3.15 kernel. I've tried > hardened-sources-3.14.29 and there's no problem with the fan, at least in > auto mode. But since you change the mode to manual

On (Tue) 12 Aug 2014 [06:55:27], Greg KH wrote: > On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 06:11:47PM +0530, Amit Shah wrote: > > This is a 3.16-only patch. The linux.git fix is > > 5c06273401f2eb7b290cadbae18ee00f8f65e893, which fixes this issue in a > > different way. > > Why "different"? Why can't I take that original patch instead? What is > different in this