Displaying 20 results from an estimated 313 matches for "3.0.25".
Did you mean:
3.0.2
2007 Apr 03
1
Winbind 3.0.25-pre2 problems with sid2uid
Hi,
I have tested winbind in samba-3.0.25-pre2 and encountered some problems. We have a working config with Linux samba-3.0.23d and W2k3 AD R2 rfc2307bis, but when I switch to 3.0.25 it stopped working. I am not quite familiar with the new configuration directives for idmap, but the old config did not work either with 3.0.25, so I tried to use the new ones.
Is there apparent errors in my config
2007 May 18
1
3.0.25 smbclient problem
I updated all my servers to 3.0.25 early this morning. Everything seems
100% A-OK except for the most surprising thing, all my Windows and
Macintosh clients, no problems. But I'm having severe difficulty with
the 3.0.25 smbclient. If I use smbclient from 3.0.24 it too can connect
to my 3.0.25 servers without issue.
Its bizarre. Before I go into it let me say, I've got some 3.0.25
2007 May 16
2
Centos4 x86_64 upgrade from samba sernet 3.0.24 to sernet 3.0.25
Hi.
I have problems, when upgraded from samba sernet 3.0.24 to 3.0.25 (too
early ?):
1) always must change password, when log in to windows XP professonall -
samba 3.0.25 PDC - password expired
2) I can't browse widnows network on client machine - network broswer in
WinXP don't respond - just hangs
3) I cann't priny any more to printers attached to another widnows
machines
2007 May 18
2
force group to Unix group in 3.0.25
Hi,
I'm currently using v3.0.24 in production and all works well.
I'm testing 3.0.25 to see if I'm going to have any problems with it if I have to upgrade.
I have a problem with the "force group" setting if it is set to a local Unix group.
This same setting works fine in 3.0.24 but I'm denied access to the same share
in 3.0.25. If I comment off the "force
2007 May 14
2
3.0.25 *breaks* stand alone server, 3.0.24 works fine
Gerry,
It looks like 3.0.25 breaks "stand alone/no winbind/no domain" servers.
This is remeniscent of the 3.0.23b SID/GID problem. The only thing that
jumps out at me is that you can't access your home share and other shares
just quit working. Looking at the log files, I see this:
[2007/05/14 15:24:55, 10] smbd/open.c:share_conflict(389)
share_conflict:
2008 Jun 03
3
getent not listing ADS users ctdb samba
Hi,
I am setting up ctdb samba, and have hit a brick wall trying to solve the
following issue.
1. getent does not retrieve the list of domain users or groups (wbinfo
works fine)
I'm not sure what I'm missing but I've almost spent the whole day trying to
resolve this one and haven't made any progress :-(
Any help or suggestions are appreciated
My configuration is
2007 May 30
4
difficulties in rid mappings in 3.0.25
I use the sernet samba packages on debian sarge and have problems after
upgrading to 3.0.25 with rid mappings.
My rid configuration for 3.0.24 looks like this
idmap backend = rid:ISC=500-100000000
idmap uid = 500-100000000
idmap gid = 500-100000000
after updating to 3.0.25 I get a core dump of winbind (log at the end of
the post) with these settings.
I tried to use the new configuration
2007 May 17
1
prexec change between 3.0.24 to 3.0.25
Hello,
I've been testing out 3.0.25 before putting it into production and came
across an issue.
As a simple example..
in a share definition
root preexec = echo "hey there, hi there, hello" > /tmp/hiya.txt
works fine under 3.0.24
not so under 3.0.25, /tmp/hiya.txt isn't created.
Cranking up the debugging and using some other similiar tests it seems
to me that Samba is in
2007 Jun 03
1
FW: Followup Restricting to a subset of the domain controllers on a site
-----Original Message-----
From: Wayne Rasmussen
Sent: Friday, June 01, 2007 11:01 AM
To: 'Gerald (Jerry) Carter'
Subject: RE: [Samba] Followup Restricting to a subset of the domain
controllers on a site
Noticed a couple of changes with Samba-3.0.25 and wondered if I am doing
something wrong or if it is a side-effect.
attached three files: smb.conf, samba-3.0.10.log, samba-3.0.25.log
2007 May 18
2
Endless Password Expiration in 3.0.25
People who have reported this bug (Endless Password Expiration in
3.0.25, bugzilla id #4630) can you please let me know if you're
working on 64-bit machines please ? I'm trying to track this
down for 3.0.25a and am working on a theory....
Jeremy.
2007 May 14
1
Samba 3.0.25 Available for Download
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
==============================================================
I'm thinking with sand here!
-- JFK in "Bubba Ho-Tep"
==============================================================
Release Announcements
=====================
This is the first production release of
2007 May 15
2
3.0.25: non-Kerberos authentication fails when security=ads?
I have several servers running Samba, all using security = ads mode.
After updating one of the servers to 3.0.25, non-Kerberos login
attempts now fail, although Kerberos logins work just fine. E.g.:
$ smbclient -k -L //my-server
OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 3.0.25-0.0]
Sharename Type Comment
--------- ---- -------
...
$ smbclient -U username -L
2007 May 24
1
Samba 3.0.25 crash
Hello,
I install the new version 3.0.25 on
SunOS name.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE 5.10 Generic_118855-33 i86pc i386 i86pc
But it crashes if I try to write something at a share.
In the samba logs I can find the lines
INTERNAL ERROR: Signal 11 in pid 13573 (3.0.25)
Please read the Trouble-Shooting section of the Samba3-HOWTO
and in the syslog I see
enunix: [ID 603404 kern.notice] NOTICE: core_log:
2007 Jul 18
3
upgrade to 3.0.25 and ads
Hi,
I'm presently testing to upgrade from 3.0.22 to 3.0.25 and have an ads
problem.
net -d 10 -s /etc/samba/smb.conf ads join
3.0.25:
=======
[2007/07/18 12:03:11, 4] libsmb/namequery_dc.c:ads_dc_name(131)
ads_dc_name: using server='ADS-2K3.ADS2K3.Q-LEAP.DE' IP=192.168.53.212
[...]
[2007/07/18 12:03:11, 3] libads/ldap.c:ads_connect(394)
Connected to LDAP server 192.168.53.212
2007 May 14
0
Samba 3.0.25 Available for Download
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
==============================================================
I'm thinking with sand here!
-- JFK in "Bubba Ho-Tep"
==============================================================
Release Announcements
=====================
This is the first production release of
2007 Jul 10
2
idmap syntax transition from 3.0.20 to 3.0.25 ?
Dear Samba people,
I am going to upgrade a Samba domain member server,
which is a member of an AD domain. Its Windows user-ids
and group-ids are stored on 2 Open-LDAP servers.
I have look in the mailinglists and in the docs, but have
not found any good examples of how to change the
old syntax into the new(in 3.0.25).
Is there a place where I can find some examples ?
Our old idmap config lines
2007 Mar 21
1
Will *not* be providing RedHat 9 packages for Samba 3.0.25
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Folks,
For the minority of people who still run RedHat 9 or earlier,
I will not be building an RPM for Samba 3.0.25 for that
platform. If someone wants to pickup maintenance of it,
I'll be glad to turn it over.
I will leave the RedHat-9 packaging files in for the 3.0.25pre2
release that we are currently working on, but unless I
hear an outcry
2007 May 17
2
Some problems updating to 3.0.25
We've updated from 3.0.24 to 3.0.25 and we've noticed some minor
problems such as some clients had to reboot in order to mount the share.
And the log is now showing this warning all the time:
WARNING: Winbindd not running, mapping ids with legacy code
[2007/05/17 08:57:37, 2] passdb/lookup_sid.c:sid_to_gid(1435)
We are thinking to revert to the previous version 3.0.24 which works
2007 May 21
1
Altered behavior in 3.0.25 and 3.0.24-gc-1
By mistake or by design membership in a Windows Primary Group seems to be mandatory!
We are using printservers configured as member servers of Samba domains.
with the following configuration
security = DOMAIN
password server = PDC
encrypt passwords = yes
map to guest = Bad Password
The Samba PDCs use plain smbpasswd files.
Since upgrading to 3.0.25 and
2007 Aug 03
1
full_audit on Samba 3.0.20 vs 3.0.25
Hi List,
Just a quick question for you: Does Samba 3.0.20 support the full_audit
module? I've got the module operating on two boxes, one with Samba
3.0.25 and the other with 3.0.20, and only the former seems to interpret
VFS directives, such as:
full_audit:prefix = %u
full_audit:failure = none
full_audit:success = open write close
On the 3.0.20 box, they seem to be ignored,