search for: 3.0.0rc2

Hello group, I have downloaded the source file of samba 3: samba-3.0.0rc2-1.src.rpm.And build it for redhat 9.0,I didn't see any redhat package of samba 3 for redhat 9.0. when i install the source,and built redhat package using the following command: rpmbuild -ba samba3.spec. It seem OK,but at last,it report the error: Can everybody help me and show me how to fix the error. Thanks a lot.

Network has a samba domain controller with various win2000 hosts. I just install samba 3.0.0rc2 on one of the linux boxes and can no longer connect to the win2000 hosts: # smbclient -d 4 -L grossman [2003/09/08 16:37:56, 3] param/loadparm.c:lp_load(3916) lp_load: refreshing parameters [2003/09/08 16:37:56, 3] param/loadparm.c:init_globals(1300) Initialising global parameters [2003/09/08

This morning I got two users come down to me saying their word doc was lost. Apparently they tried to save their docs to their home folder which is on samba share. XP had given an error along the lines 'Network connection to network drive is lost and word is unable to save the document' and then Word crashed. I went to smb logs and found this. [2004/01/22 10:03:11, 0]

Hi, I am testing Samba 3.0.0rc2...and i have a problem... in smb.conf seems to miss the variable %U.... here is the example: my smb.conf [homes] comment = Home Directories path= /home/%U/samba browseable = no writable = yes and that is the result if i try to access into that share: smbclient '\\server\claudio' -U claudio Password: tree connect failed:

Hi all, I am using solaris9 x86 with samba-3.0.0rc2, getting this errors by running any samba command. any help is appreciated. ./testparm Load smb config files from /data4/samba3_rc2/lib/smb.conf Error loading module '/data4/samba3_rc2/lib/charset/646.so': ld.so.1: ./testparm : fatal: /data4/samba3_rc2/lib/charset/646.so: open failed: No such file or dire ctory Error loading module

Hi all: I've looked in the archives and seen several refernces to this error message but no solution put forth. I'm running samba 3.0.0 rc2 on RedHat 9. The following shows up for each of my users in the syslog: Sep 8 15:17:14 main2 smbd[31974]: get_domain_user_groups: primary gid of user [nsb] is not a Domain group ! Sep 8 15:17:14 main2 smbd[31974]: get_domain_user_groups: You

Hi All, Here is my configure script: ./configure --with-ldap --with-ldapsam Configure works ok. But during make the following error message was received. ---- Using FLAGS = -g -O2 -Iinclude -I/usr/local/src/samba-3.0.0rc2/source/include -I/usr/local/src/samba-3.0.0rc2/source/ubiqx -I/usr/local/src/samba-3.0.0rc2/source/smbwrapper -I. -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64

Dear all, ___Setup: - several wINDOWS 2000 workstations on SP4 (reg-patches applied, they worked on 2.x-stable) - Samba PDC (CVS 3.0.0rc2) (machine accounts added aswell as users in unix & samba) - OpenLDAP (2.1.12) <-- (Not really relevant since I tried without ldap too, so no info about that from this point) - Linux <HOSTNAME> 2.4.19 #1 Fri Jun 13 15:22:09 UTC 2003 i686

Hi, I have checked out the cvs tree on Monday, Aug 25 which includes your patch, built and installed it but without success: log.nmbd: [2003/08/27 16:34:00, 0] nmbd/nmbd_nameregister.c:(73) register_name_response: Answer name EMEA.CORPDIR.NE<00> differs from question name EMEA.CORPDIR.NET<00>. [2003/08/27 16:34:00, 0] nmbd/nmbd_nameregister.c:(73) register_name_response: Answer

Hello, I'm using Samba 3.0.0rc2-Debian on Debian unstable. At the time being it does everything I want it to except one: I'm in the wrong workgroup. Despite the line workgroup = BETASIG in my smb.conf, I show up in the workgroup "WORKGROUP." There is no mention of "workgroup" or "WORKGROUP" anywhere else in my smb.conf other than this. Would be happy

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 The Samba Team is proud to announce the availability of the second release candidate of the Samba 3.0.0 code base. A release candidate implies that the code is very close to a final release, but remember that this is still a non-production snapshot intended for testing purposes. Use it at your own risk. The source code can be downloaded from :

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Preface - ------- Here are the informal plans for the actual 3.0.0 release: We, the Samba Team, hope that this will be the final RC before the real 3.0.0 release. Unless there is a severe bug in the Samba source that would affect a large number of the community, the source/ directory in RC3 will stay the same for 3.0.0. The docs/ directory

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 The Samba Team is proud to announce the availability of the second release candidate of the Samba 3.0.0 code base. A release candidate implies that the code is very close to a final release, but remember that this is still a non-production snapshot intended for testing purposes. Use it at your own risk. The source code can be downloaded from :

Hello, Is it possible to put %U or %S in the valid users line? I'm trying: valid users = %D+%U for a certain homedir setup (automagically creates if non-existent), but the level 10 logs show that it always tries: checking |MIXEDDOMAIN+dl| against |%D+%U|, and does not expand the macro. This is with Samba-3.0.0rc2 (happens with beta3 also.) Same thing happens with %U or %S. It worked in

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Preface - ------- Here are the informal plans for the actual 3.0.0 release: We, the Samba Team, hope that this will be the final RC before the real 3.0.0 release. Unless there is a severe bug in the Samba source that would affect a large number of the community, the source/ directory in RC3 will stay the same for 3.0.0. The docs/ directory

Hi. It looks like the gpg signatures of the RC2 and RC3 tarballs are bogus... I've tested the .bz2 and .tar.gz files downloaded from the us1 and us4 mirrors. To confirm that it's not a local problem, I've tested the signature of the Samba_CA.crt file (http://us4.samba.org/samba/ftp/) and it's ok. Can someone else please confirm it? Thanks. - Ademar $ gpg --verify

Hi, I found a solution that worked for me: My kerberos installation wasn't in the $PATH though one should think the binaries are recognized by using the --with-krb5=/path flag :-( I simply exported my $PATH including the '/path/to/kerberos/bin' and voila, everything is fine :-) best regards ~christoph -- /* Christoph Beyer | Office: Building 2b / 23 *\ * DESY

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 This is a release candidate snapshot of the Samba 3.0.1 code base (hopefully the last one prior to the final 3.0.1 release) and is provided for testing only. A release candidate (RC) means that we are close to the the final, stable version and is provided for Quality Assurance (QA) purposes. Use at your own risk. The source code can be downloaded

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 This is a release candidate snapshot of the Samba 3.0.1 code base (hopefully the last one prior to the final 3.0.1 release) and is provided for testing only. A release candidate (RC) means that we are close to the the final, stable version and is provided for Quality Assurance (QA) purposes. Use at your own risk. The source code can be downloaded

In 2.2.8a days, findsmb would print the OS and Server version of the machines it found, like this: *=DMB +=LMB IP ADDR NETBIOS NAME WORKGROUP/OS/VERSION --------------------------------------------------------------------- 192.168.49.247 WINQA1 [QATEST] [Windows 5.0] [Windows 2000 LAN Manager] 192.168.49.250 WINQA2