search for: 2yrs

...or+adj.close) I only get the following: Call: lm(formula = KS ~ libor + adj.close) Coefficients: (Intercept) libor adj.close -56.38666 55.39709 -0.01836 I don't get the estimated standard deviation, error, t-value etc. anymore which I used to get when I use an old version (2yrs ago). What command do I need to give in to get this information? 2)I need to show that there is no auto regression between different time-series that I have, what do I give in to check this? Thanks, E.Z. [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

...e kernel build, is that right? Or do I need a different kernel altogether? Also the sites say the 8K is about as large as you should take the stack :oS Also someone posted that I need to sort out the IRQs, is this part of linux? As you can guess I'm kinda new to linux, although ive used it for 2yrs not this much indepth. >I discovered the Zap drivers do not appear to have enough stack headroom in >a standard 2.6 kernel. I had a similar problem until I used a kernel with >16k stacks instead of 4k stacks. > >Dave > >Tom Lawrence wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I kno...

Sorry to do this .... AGAIN Every year or two I get stuck on this same problem involving excluding. Seems I learn how its done then 2yrs later I've totally forgotten and when I look up my notes ... this new need is just different enough that they don't apply. Here's the problem. (Simplified... and I've skipped some of the repetitive output) On remote ls A/ a/ b/ c/ d e on local pwd /rmh/dir from local rsy...

...;that's a bad idea". We thought so, too. > That's the reason VPlan has its own local data structure that it can play with. > > Making a copy of the entire function is far worse than copying a loop > (nest). Unless the community mindset has dramatically changed since > ~2yrs ago, it's unlikely that you'll get overwhelming support on "copy the entire function" before the decision to transform is taken. So, if this part is optional, you may want to state that. > > Having said that, in https://reviews.llvm.org/D38676, we are > introducing conce...

Hello! Recently,I¡¯m doing a security project based upon ipv6.I have built up a bridge to support a transparent firewall.(my system is Fedora Core 2,kernel 2.6.5).In this system ,the version of the iptables is 1.2.7,which does not support ipv6(I have tried it).Thus,I download a new version and test it. The iptables functions in bridge mode,but the ipv6 doesn't work well.In the

.... When i run a tcpdump on both the virtual machine eth0 and the physical host vif interface i can see a load of arp requests on both. ie; who-is at xx.xx.xx.xx tell xx.xx.xx.xx. After 30-40 seconds it decides to clear itself and continue the traffic. It must have been a long standing issue over the 2yrs however as we are generating more and more traffic to the virtual machines i think it's becoming overloaded and stopping the VM from accepting any incoming/outgoing connections until it clears itself somehow. Problem is i don't know how to troubleshoot this within Xen. I tried using the xen...

...nsus in LLVM-DEV was "that's a bad idea". We thought so, too. That's the reason VPlan has its own local data structure that it can play with. Making a copy of the entire function is far worse than copying a loop (nest). Unless the community mindset has dramatically changed since ~2yrs ago, it's unlikely that you'll get overwhelming support on "copy the entire function" before the decision to transform is taken. So, if this part is optional, you may want to state that. Having said that, in https://reviews.llvm.org/D38676, we are introducing concepts like VPValu...

...quot;. We thought so, too. > > That's the reason VPlan has its own local data structure that it can > play with. > > > > Making a copy of the entire function is far worse than copying a loop > (nest). Unless the community mindset has dramatically > > changed since ~2yrs ago, it's unlikely that you'll get overwhelming > support on "copy the entire function" before the decision > > to transform is taken. So, if this part is optional, you may want to > state that. > > > > Having said that, in https://reviews.llvm.org/D38676,...