search for: 2x

...se comparisons between two strings. I would like to apply this function to my data (which consists of columns with different strings) in the way that it compares the first with the second entry, and then the third with the fourth, and then the fifth with the sixth, and so on down each column... So (2x-1) and (2x) would be the different entries to be compared! dat= my data: for the first column: compare dat[(2x-1),1] with dat[(2x),1] and x would be 1:i, i=length(dat[,1]) I think the best way to do that is a loop: a <- as.character(dat[(2x-1),1]) b <- as.character(dat[(2x),1]) for (i in...

Does anyone know any oss alternatives to 2x aplication server ? Regards, Silviu Hutanu -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20100718/3ef6bb73/attachment.html>

...ry well. > > I'm not going to post any further updates unless something breaks. > Thanks to everyone that provided tips and suggestions along the way. > Do you mind sharing what hardware have you been running the 4.9 kernel on other than "Supermicro X9DRT, Dual Xeon E5-2650, 2x I350, 2x 82571EB" and "Supermicro X9DRD-iF/LF, Dual Xeon E5-2630, 2x I350, 2x 82575EB" if any? Are you using any SATA/SAS controllers? Thanks, Sarah

...d require a hard boot to resolve. All have Intel NICs. Often the systems will remain stable for days or weeks, then suddenly encounter one of these issues. I have yet to tie the error to any specific action on the systems and can't reproduce it reliably. - Supermicro X8DT3, Dual Xeon E5620, 2x 82575EB NICs, 2x 82576 NICs Kernel messages upon failure: pcieport 0000:00:03.0: AER: Multiple Corrected error received: id=0018 pcieport 0000:00:03.0: PCIe Bus Error: severity=Corrected, type=Transaction Layer, id=0018(Receiver ID) pcieport 0000:00:03.0: device [8086:340a] error status/mask=00...

all but one lan host (gv)can ssh connect to host 2x Included windows 10, several linux. 2x is a solaris host. That problem host (gv) can connect to all others but 2x. 2x can connect to all other encluding the problem host (gv) So gv ssh to 2x throws this error: ssh_dispatch_run_fatal: Connection to 192.168.1.42 port 22: incorrect signature. 1...

Hi. I'm Bill Cox, and I volunteer a bit for the Vinux project, which is Linux for people with vision impairments. Most blind users use a closed-source speech synthesis tool called voxin, as it's very easy to understand at high speed. I would like to make TTS synthesizers based on large recorded vocabularies of actual speech, but to make it useful for the blind, I need to be able to

...'a','b','b','b','b','c','c','c','c','a','a','a','a','b','b','b','b','c','c','c','c'), rate = c('1x','2x','4x','8x','1x','2x','4x','8x','1x','2x','4x','8x','1x','2x','4x','8x','1x','2x','4x','8x','1x','2x','4x','8x','1x&...

...t might be? Thanks, Bill On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 5:14 PM, Bill Cox <waywardgeek at gmail.com> wrote: > I was able to easily hack in an option to play back at different > speeds. ?For example, using "speexdec --speed 2.0 file.enc file.wav" > plays back encoded file.enc at 2X speed. ?What I did was divide > st->frameSize and st->subFrameSize by the speedup, and added a > SPEEX_SET_SPEED decoder control for the nb_celp decoder. ?This > produced speech that was 2X faster than the original. > > However, the quality is very poor. ?This is where it gets...

...009, at 10:25 AM, Jon Harrop wrote: > >> In this case, the assertion that LLVM is slow is correct: it's > >> definitely slower than a non-optimizing compiler. > > > > I'm *very* surprised by this and will test it myself... I've tested it and LLVM is indeed 2x slower to compile, although it generates code that is 2x faster to run... > Compared to a compiler in the same category as PCC, whose pinnacle of > optimization is doing register allocation? I'm not surprised at all. What else does LLVM do with optimizations turned off that makes it s...

...ave a direct connection with the signal. Jean-Marc Bill Cox <waywardgeek at gmail.com> a ?crit?: > I was able to easily hack in an option to play back at different > speeds. For example, using "speexdec --speed 2.0 file.enc file.wav" > plays back encoded file.enc at 2X speed. What I did was divide > st->frameSize and st->subFrameSize by the speedup, and added a > SPEEX_SET_SPEED decoder control for the nb_celp decoder. This > produced speech that was 2X faster than the original. > > However, the quality is very poor. This is where it gets...

...going to post any further updates unless something breaks. >>> Thanks to everyone that provided tips and suggestions along the way. >>> >> >> Do you mind sharing what hardware have you been running the 4.9 kernel on other than "Supermicro X9DRT, Dual Xeon E5-2650, 2x I350, 2x 82571EB" and >> "Supermicro X9DRD-iF/LF, Dual Xeon E5-2630, 2x I350, 2x 82575EB" if any? Are you using any SATA/SAS controllers? > > We have no expansion cards installed except for the dual-port gigabit > NICs. We're using the onboard SATA controller for...

...9;m putting together a streaming relay network for the linux audio developer's conference #2 (http://www.zkm.de/lad), and i was wondering how much cpu power will be required on the master server. we need to record 2 48k stereo signals simultaneously and encode them into three streams each: 2x 54kbit/s 22k05 mono 2x 112kbit/s 48k stereo 2x 192kbit/s 48k stereo it would be very nice if the same box could handle the streaming to between 5 and 8 relay servers, so that we have only one single point of failure. how much cpu and memory do you think we'll need to be on the *very safe*...

Hi guys, I am about to reshape my data spool and am wondering what performance diff. I can expect from the new config. Vs. The old. The old config. Is a pool of a single vdev of 8 disks raidz2. The new pool config is 2vdev''s of 7 disk raidz2 in a single pool. I understand it should be better with higher io throughput....and better read/write rates...but interested to hear the science

Hello, I'm currently playing with a number of dovecot instances to evaluate my "next generation setup" For now I run 6 instances of dovecot, one per docker container: - 2x redirector - 2x backend #1 - 2x backend #2 All docker container use syslog. And there the problems starts. Every instance identify itself as "dovecot" That's not helpful :-/ I tried to set an instance name but that change nothing. My options are now - let rsyslogd separate the so...

Dear members, I was trying to simulate W which is iid and depends on X and Y. Here are 2 methods: Method 1: x<-rnorm(100) y<-rnorm(100) w<-rnorm(100, 2x+y,1) Method 2: x<-rnorm(100) y<-rnorm(100) w<-2x+y+rnorm(100,0,1) Are these methods comparable? Since x and y are vectors, the term 2x+y would return a vector. It seems that, given Method 1, each element of W would come from a different population with means depending on the value...

I have a simple test program which encodes, decodes and displays a single video stream ( at 2-3 fps ). It takes about 15% of CPU time when it uses DivX codec, but 35% when the VP31 codec is active. Is there any way to speed encoding/decoding with VP31 ? Or maybe VP31 is just much slower than DivX ? Kamil <p>--- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ Ogg project homepage:

Hello, I'm searching some information about the Vorbis window function. I have read the following post from the mailing list archive (July 2003) where the function and its proof was explained: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/vorbis-dev/2003-July/007588.html Everything apart from one small passage was clear to me. f^2(x) + f^2(n/2+x) = 1 <=> f^2(x) + f^2(n/2-x) = 1 <-- here in

...stimator for the marginal hazard modelling of multiple events data (Wei, Lin, and Weissfeld 1989 JASA), and is implemented in Lin's MULCOX2, SAS, and S-plus. Is this the way to fit such a model in R? Suppose I have variables: time, delta, treatment, and surrogate. Should I repeat the dataset (2x) and stack, creating the variables: time1 (time repeated 2x), delta1 (delta repeated 2x), treatment1 (same as treatment, but 0's for the 2nd set), treatment2 (0's in first set, then same as treatment), and surrogate2 (0's in first set, then same as treatment), and id (label the subject,...

On Nov 19, 2009, at 10:25 AM, Jon Harrop wrote: > > >> In this case, the assertion that LLVM is slow is correct: it's >> definitely slower than a non-optimizing compiler. > > I'm *very* surprised by this and will test it myself... Compared to a compiler in the same category as PCC, whose pinnacle of optimization is doing register allocation? I'm not

...uired is to have visitSIGN_EXTEND generate a VSELECT if VT is a vector… ISD::SELECT should be used for cases where the selector is a scalar, even if the operands are vector. If you found a case where SELECT is used with a vector operand then this is a bug. I did… It originates from an icmp ne <2x i8>, zero initializer followed by a sext of the result 2x i1 to 2x i8. When we visit the SIGN_EXTEND, we generate the ISD::SELECT even though the selector and both operands are vectors. We should probably add an assert in SelectionDAG::getNode(). I've tried a local change that cures this p...