Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "2int".
Did you mean:
20int
2003 Jun 16
1
RE: CBQ-wondershaper superior over HTB-wondershaper?
...well below 150 where it would be > 2000 without traffic
shaper. I regard this already for quite an accomplishment, though it is not
good enough yet for a gamer. I need stable pings, and the pings now are
around 60 and 150. To demonstrate what I mean I give you the ping output:
64 bytes from 2int.de (217.160.128.207): icmp_seq=347 ttl=56 time=128 ms
64 bytes from 2int.de (217.160.128.207): icmp_seq=348 ttl=56 time=136 ms
64 bytes from 2int.de (217.160.128.207): icmp_seq=349 ttl=56 time=133 ms
64 bytes from 2int.de (217.160.128.207): icmp_seq=350 ttl=56 time=143 ms
64 bytes from 2int.de (217...
2003 Nov 28
2
GLM FITTED VALUES TABLE
...m. I've supplied a copy of the
code in order to perform the analysis.
My question is: HOW DOES ONE CONVERT THE OUTPUT (FITTED VALUES)
SUPPLIED BY R AND DISPLAY THEM IN A CONTINGENCY TABLE?
allergy<-read.table("c:/a.dat",header=T)
attach(allergy)
allergy.fit.main.2int<-glm(y~ .^2,family=poisson, data=allergy)
fitted(allergy.fit.main.2int)
The fitted values are:
1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8
666.198041 25.858478 14.943481 60.568127 5.350317 5.081557
28.233832 3.791205
9...