search for: 2g

Hi, Given the following, a <- rnorm(5) b <- rnorm(5) c <- rnorm(5) a.1g.scale <- scale(c(a,b,c))[1:5] b.1g.scale <- scale(c(a,b,c))[6:10] c.1g.scale <- scale(c(a,b,c))[11:15] a.2g.scale <- scale(c(a,b))[1:5] b.2g.scale <- scale(c(a,b))[6:10] c.2g.scale <- scale(c) a.3g.scale <- scale(a) b.3g.scale <- scale(b) c.3g.scale <- scale(c) I am puzzled why the p-values are identical for t.test(a.1g.scale, b.1g.scale), t.test(a.2g.scale, b.2g.scale), and t.test(a,...

...se cover RAM: 0G gran_size: 64K chunk_size: 256M num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: 0G *BAD*gran_size: 64K chunk_size: 512M num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: -256M gran_size: 64K chunk_size: 1G num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: 0G *BAD*gran_size: 64K chunk_size: 2G num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: -1G gran_size: 128K chunk_size: 128K num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: 126M gran_size: 128K chunk_size: 256K num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: 126M gran_size: 128K chunk_size: 512K num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: 126M gra...

On Sun, 4 Aug 2019, Jonathan Billings wrote: > Are you sure you don?t have other processes or users running on the system? It only happens when you have a network connection? It might also be swapping heavily, check to see how much RAM you have. Check the output of ?free?. Pretty sure. I rebooted this morning. top - 17:32:20 up 15:47, 6 users, load average: 1.12, 2.55, 1.56 Tasks: 238

...ownside is that it will be slower than running Ubuntu natively. > > I say, try running in VirtualBox first. Not much slower. VBox does an amazing job at getting near native performance on modern machines (those with nested paging etc.). This is definitely the best option if your computer has ~2g ram and 2+ cores. Give the Ubuntu VM 2g and 1 (maybe 2) core/s and it should be fine. Also, look into seamless mode. It lets you use windows opened in the VM in the host OS. That sounds vague. Just Google it. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http:...

...8:00:36 server kernel: Done with spanconfig! Jul 5 18:00:36 server kernel: dahdi: Registered tone zone 0 (United States / North America) Jul 5 18:00:36 server kernel: About to enter startup! Jul 5 18:00:36 server kernel: TE4XXP: Span 1 configured for CCS/HDB3/CRC4 Jul 5 18:00:36 server kernel: 2G: Got interrupt, status = 0000000c, CIS = 0080 Jul 5 18:00:36 server kernel: wct4xxp 0000:06:08.0: timing source auto Jul 5 18:00:36 server kernel: wct4xxp 0000:06:08.0: Evaluating spans for timing source Jul 5 18:00:36 server kernel: wct4xxp 0000:06:08.0: span 1 is green : syncpos 1 Jul 5 18...

...lose cover RAM: 0G gran_size: 64K chunk_size: 256M num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: 0G *BAD*gran_size: 64K chunk_size: 512M num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: -256M *BAD*gran_size: 64K chunk_size: 1G num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: -512M *BAD*gran_size: 64K chunk_size: 2G num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: -512M gran_size: 128K chunk_size: 128K num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: 56M gran_size: 128K chunk_size: 256K num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: 56M gran_size: 128K chunk_size: 512K num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: 56M gran_size: 128K...

Hi all, I have two matrices: G<-matrix(c(2.0, 0.5, 0.5, 0.5, 2.0, 0.5, 0.5, 0.5,2.0),3,3) P<-matrix(c(1.0, 0.5, 0.5, 0.5, 1.0, 0.5, 0.5, 0.5,1.0),3,3) and I want to run this equation to get a new matrix F: F = [P+2G]^-1/2 P [P+2G]^-1/2 Could someone please tell me how to code this in R? Many thanks in advance for your time. Best wishes, Matt [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

...k kernel: Registered tone zone 0 (United States / North America) Apr 30 23:52:59 asterisk kernel: About to enter startup! Apr 30 23:52:59 asterisk kernel: TE4XXP: Span 1 configured for ESF/B8ZS Apr 30 23:52:59 asterisk kernel: wct4xxp: Setting yellow alarm on span 1 Apr 30 23:52:59 asterisk kernel: 2G: Got interrupt, status = 0000ff0c, GIS = 0080 Apr 30 23:52:59 asterisk kernel: 2G: Got interrupt, status = 0000ff0a, GIS = 0080 Apr 30 23:52:59 asterisk kernel: 2G: Got interrupt, status = 0000ff0a, GIS = 0080 Apr 30 23:52:59 asterisk kernel: VPM: Span 0 U-law mode Apr 30 23:52:59 asterisk kernel:...

...m_reg: 8 lose cover RAM: 0G Apr 11 17:25:36 kernel: *BAD*gran_size: 64K chunk_size: 512M num_reg: 8 lose cover RAM: -256M Apr 11 17:25:36 kernel: gran_size: 64K chunk_size: 1G num_reg: 8 lose cover RAM: 0G Apr 11 17:25:36 kernel: *BAD*gran_size: 64K chunk_size: 2G num_reg: 8 lose cover RAM: -1G Apr 11 17:25:36 kernel: gran_size: 128K chunk_size: 128K num_reg: 8 lose cover RAM: 4865M Apr 11 17:25:36 kernel: gran_size: 128K chunk_size: 256K num_reg: 8 lose cover RAM: 4865M Apr 11 17:25:36 kernel: gran_size: 128K chunk_...

...s been configured in Android softphone 3cx. When I tried to call from Andorid phone to some other IP extension which is registered in Asterisk, I am not able to hear the voice, when I check the asterisk log or wireshark there is only one way RTP traffic, from Android I am connecting to Asterisk via 2G GSM network. Any idea would be appreciated. Regards, Gopal -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20110824/e7fcd692/attachment.htm>

Author: basabi Repository: /hg/zfs-crypto/gate Revision: 4bb3638905e4a1eb6ee0228d46cc603b32dfef22 Log message: 6408445 logadm rotates regardless with -s 2g Files: update: usr/src/cmd/logadm/fn.c update: usr/src/cmd/logadm/fn.h update: usr/src/cmd/logadm/main.c update: usr/src/cmd/logadm/opts.c update: usr/src/cmd/logadm/opts.h

Dear All, I''m new to XEN and I''m trying to get it work under gentoo 2006.0 with a patched 2.16.18-xen kernel. My system does not recognize my 2G of RAM. It only sees 512M! Adding mem=2G or mem=2000M to grub.conf did not help at all. The system continues to see only the dom0_mem=512M Can you explain me why? My grub.conf entry looks like this: title=Xen root (hd0,0) kernel /xen.gz dom0_mem=512M mem=2G module /vmlinuz-xen root = /dev/sda2 t...

fix batch map on x86_64 with more than 2G region size. Signed-off-by: Xin Li <xin.b.li@intel.com> _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

...o All, I'm running Samba 2.2.7a on RedHat 8.0. Connecting to a Windows 2000 200GB share works OK, except for files > 2 GBytes. The linux box can see the large Windows files, but does not see their correct sizes -- it reports an absurdly big size when using ls -l. Files less that 2GB show up correctly. Trying to create a 3G file on the Windows box from the linux box, using: dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/ntserver/bigfile bs=100M count=30 results in an error when the file hits 2G, with the error "file size limit exceeded". Running the same command creating a fi...

On 2013-07-24 09:47, Tyler Hardin wrote: > Not much slower. VBox does an amazing job at getting near native > performance on modern machines (those with nested paging etc.). This is > definitely the best option if your computer has ~2g ram and 2+ cores. > Give the Ubuntu VM 2g and 1 (maybe 2) core/s and it should be fine. At work, it takes significantly longer to boot our Ruby on Rails application on a virtual machine than natively. I also noticed that disk access can be quite slow on a virtual machine compared to native....

...login i only got load: 0.09 cmd: login 1611 [zfs] 0.00u 0.00s 0% 208k I found one post like this earlier (by Xin LI), but nobody seemed to have replied... in my current conf, I think my kmem/kmem_max is at 512Mb (not sure though, since I've edited my file yesterday for next reboot), with 2G of system RAM.. Normally I'd run kmem(max) 1G (with arcsize of 512M. currently it is at default), but since I just got back to 2G total mem after some hardware problems I've been runnig at those lows (1G total is kindof tight with zfs..) Well, just wanted to report... The box is no...

...requires it but no entry exist in the kernel GOT. exists > > Position Independent Executable (PIE) support will allow to extended the will allow us to extend the > KASLR randomization range below the -2G memory limit. Does that say "below th negative 2G memory limit"? I don't get it. > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Garnier <thgarnie at google.com> > --- > arch/x86/Makefile | 4 + > arch/x86/include/asm/module.h | 11 ++ > arch/x86/include/asm/...

...requires it but no entry exist in the kernel GOT. exists > > Position Independent Executable (PIE) support will allow to extended the will allow us to extend the > KASLR randomization range below the -2G memory limit. Does that say "below th negative 2G memory limit"? I don't get it. > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Garnier <thgarnie at google.com> > --- > arch/x86/Makefile | 4 + > arch/x86/include/asm/module.h | 11 ++ > arch/x86/include/asm/...

...))) The problem I have is that quota information is not updated when I changed in my ldap. These are the steps I'm running: 1. First, I check current quota (dovecot just restarted): amateo_adm at myotis60:/etc/dovecot/conf.d$ sudo doveadm user -f quota_rule angel.luis at um.es *:storage=2G in the log I get: Oct 29 14:29:46 myotis60 dovecot: auth: Debug: master in: USER#0111#011angel.luis at um.es#011service=doveadm#011debug Oct 29 14:29:46 myotis60 dovecot: auth: Debug: prefetch(angel.luis at um.es): passdb didn't return userdb entries, trying the next userdb Oct 29 14:29:46...

Hi All, I am running nevada 79 BFU''ed to 82. The machine is a Ultra 20 with 4GB memory. I have several Windows XP domU''s configured and registered. When ever I try to start the fourth domain I get an out of memory exception: Not enough memory is available, and dom0 cannot be shrunk any further Each of my domains only uses 256 so I thought there would be sufficient memory