search for: 2ftrunk

...AdressSanitizer?) - Should the asan run-time use cmake, or just make, or what? The build is a bit tricky, especially for tests. We currently use make. - How would you suggest to do the code review? The code of the run-time is ~5 KLOC. http://code.google.com/p/address-sanitizer/source/browse/#svn%2Ftrunk%2Fasan The Apple-specific part may make some Apple experts cry (or maybe not). The code uses google's coding style, which is similar, but not equivalent to the LLVM's one. We check it using cpplint before commits. LLVM license is used. The tests are ~2.5 KLOC; most of the tests...

...nto > the compiler-rt make build. > Yea, I may need your help, probably after the files are committed. > > > - How would you suggest to do the code review? > > The code of the run-time is ~5 > > KLOC. > http://code.google.com/p/address-sanitizer/source/browse/#svn%2Ftrunk%2Fasan > > The Apple-specific part may make some Apple experts cry (or maybe > not). > > The code uses google's coding style, which is similar, but not > equivalent > > to the LLVM's one. We check it using cpplint before commits. > > I personally would li...

...h there is a reason for it to be as complicated as it is. I can help (and/or) do the asan integration into the compiler-rt make build. > - How would you suggest to do the code review? >    The code of the run-time is ~5 > KLOC. http://code.google.com/p/address-sanitizer/source/browse/#svn%2Ftrunk%2Fasan >    The Apple-specific part may make some Apple experts cry (or maybe not). >    The code uses google's coding style, which is similar, but not equivalent > to the LLVM's one. We check it using cpplint before commits. I personally would like to see it be in LLVM style, but...

...I may need your help, probably after the files are committed. No problem! >> >> >> > - How would you suggest to do the code review? >> >    The code of the run-time is ~5 >> > >> > KLOC. http://code.google.com/p/address-sanitizer/source/browse/#svn%2Ftrunk%2Fasan >> >    The Apple-specific part may make some Apple experts cry (or maybe >> > not). >> >    The code uses google's coding style, which is similar, but not >> > equivalent >> > to the LLVM's one. We check it using cpplint before commits. &...

...to be as > complicated as it is. I can help (and/or) do the asan integration into > the compiler-rt make build. > >> - How would you suggest to do the code review? >> ? ?The code of the run-time is ~5 >> KLOC.?http://code.google.com/p/address-sanitizer/source/browse/#svn%2Ftrunk%2Fasan >> ? ?The Apple-specific part may make some Apple experts cry (or maybe not). >> ? ?The code uses google's coding style, which is similar, but not equivalent >> to the LLVM's one. We check it using cpplint before commits. > > I personally would like to see it...

From 1.2rc1 source code: preprocess.c: /* FIXME: This VAD is a kludge */ st->speech_prob = Pframe; if (st->vad_enabled) { if (st->speech_prob > st->speech_prob_start || (st->was_speech && st->speech_prob > st->speech_prob_continue)) { st->was_speech=1; return 1; } else { st->was_speech=0; return 0; } } else { return 1; } AND case

For what it's worth, I've had significantly better luck with the WebRtc VAD. It's pretty good. http://code.google.com/p/webrtc/source/browse/#svn%2Ftrunk%2Fsrc%2Fcommon_audio%2Fvad%2Fmain%2Fsource In general, the WebRTC voice engine seems to be more sophisticated and mature than the Speex preprocessor (as opposed to the Speex codec, which is pretty good). Ken Smith Cell: 425-443-2359 Email: ken at alanta.com Blog: http://blog.wouldbetheologian.com...

...h [ken at alanta.com] Sent: Monday, August 29, 2011 6:38 PM To: speex-dev at xiph.org Subject: Re: [Speex-dev] Speex VAD always returning 1 For what it's worth, I've had significantly better luck with the WebRtc VAD. It's pretty good. http://code.google.com/p/webrtc/source/browse/#svn%2Ftrunk%2Fsrc%2Fcommon_audio%2Fvad%2Fmain%2Fsource In general, the WebRTC voice engine seems to be more sophisticated and mature than the Speex preprocessor (as opposed to the Speex codec, which is pretty good). Ken Smith Cell: 425-443-2359 Email: ken at alanta.com<mailto:ken at alanta.com> Blog: h...

...k we build compiler-rt with the host compiler, except for Android. Which is usually a recently-built clang. n Linux, but we exercise osx build on our buildbots. We never build with compiler-rt not in projects/. Our bot scripts are here: https://code.google.com/p/address-sanitizer/source/browse/#svn%2Ftrunk%2Fbuild%2Fscripts%2Fslave The bots itself are not publicly visible, we hope to change that soon. > > And lastly, are there build instructions to build the Android shared object? > Is there any way to build an android static lib? How about for arm-linux? Android runtime is special, we bu...

> Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 18:29:55 +0530 > From: <xapian at catcons.co.uk> > Subject: Re: [Xapian-discuss] unoconv 0.4 issues > To: <xapian-discuss at lists.xapian.org> > Cc: 'Olly Betts' <olly at survex.com> > Message-ID: <000801cbb0c6$4a09a3b0$0f02000a at cw8xp> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > > Thanks

...for >> Android. Which is usually a recently-built clang. n Linux, but we >> exercise osx build on our buildbots. >> We never build with compiler-rt not in projects/. >> Our bot scripts are here: >> >> https://code.google.com/p/address-sanitizer/source/browse/#svn%2Ftrunk%2Fbuild%2Fscripts%2Fslave >> The bots itself are not publicly visible, we hope to change that soon. >> >> > >> > And lastly, are there build instructions to build the Android shared >> object? >> > Is there any way to build an android static lib? How ab...

...ests in the LLVM suite that exercise the functionality independent of any > runtime so that other developers can catch regressions. Also, unittests in > the LLVM unittest tree would be nice as well. > Currently, I have tests<http://code.google.com/p/address-sanitizer/source/browse/#svn%2Ftrunk%2Fasan%2Ftests>that work only with the run-time library. I will definitely need tests that don't require run-time support. > > > Have you written a Clang patch to turn this functionality on and off? > Looking at the wiki documentation shows one thing that gives me pause: > y...

...e host compiler, except for > Android. Which is usually a recently-built clang. n Linux, but we > exercise osx build on our buildbots. > We never build with compiler-rt not in projects/. > Our bot scripts are here: > > https://code.google.com/p/address-sanitizer/source/browse/#svn%2Ftrunk%2Fbuild%2Fscripts%2Fslave > The bots itself are not publicly visible, we hope to change that soon. > > > > > And lastly, are there build instructions to build the Android shared > object? > > Is there any way to build an android static lib? How about for > arm-linux?...

.... Which is usually a recently-built clang. n Linux, but we >>> exercise osx build on our buildbots. >>> We never build with compiler-rt not in projects/. >>> Our bot scripts are here: >>> >>> https://code.google.com/p/address-sanitizer/source/browse/#svn%2Ftrunk%2Fbuild%2Fscripts%2Fslave >>> The bots itself are not publicly visible, we hope to change that soon. >>> >>> > >>> > And lastly, are there build instructions to build the Android shared >>> object? >>> > Is there any way to build an and...

.... Which is usually a recently-built clang. n Linux, but we >>> exercise osx build on our buildbots. >>> We never build with compiler-rt not in projects/. >>> Our bot scripts are here: >>> >>> https://code.google.com/p/address-sanitizer/source/browse/#svn%2Ftrunk%2Fbuild%2Fscripts%2Fslave >>> The bots itself are not publicly visible, we hope to change that soon. >>> >>> > >>> > And lastly, are there build instructions to build the Android shared >>> object? >>> > Is there any way to build an and...

...hich is usually a recently-built clang. n Linux, but we >>>> exercise osx build on our buildbots. >>>> We never build with compiler-rt not in projects/. >>>> Our bot scripts are here: >>>> https://code.google.com/p/address-sanitizer/source/browse/#svn%2Ftrunk%2Fbuild%2Fscripts%2Fslave >>>> The bots itself are not publicly visible, we hope to change that soon. >>>> >>>> > >>>> > And lastly, are there build instructions to build the Android shared object? >>>> > Is there any way to buil...

Any updates on this? In particular, I'd like to see concrete patches proposed for review and inclusion into LLVM. I think having actual patches on the table and under review will help a great deal. Kostya, let me know if I can help prepare them. A few general comments as well inline... On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 1:57 AM, Kostya Serebryany <kcc at google.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 26,

...g. n Linux, but we >>>>> exercise osx build on our buildbots. >>>>> We never build with compiler-rt not in projects/. >>>>> Our bot scripts are here: >>>>> >>>>> https://code.google.com/p/address-sanitizer/source/browse/#svn%2Ftrunk%2Fbuild%2Fscripts%2Fslave >>>>> The bots itself are not publicly visible, we hope to change that soon. >>>>> >>>>> > >>>>> > And lastly, are there build instructions to build the Android shared >>>>> object? >>&g...

I may try to use the Makefile then. When using gcc the Makefile is CC := colorgcc obj-m := hello.o KERNELDIR := /lib/modules/2.6.36.1/build PWD := $(shell pwd) modules: $(MAKE) -C $(KERNELDIR) M=$(PWD) modules #modules install: # $(MAKE) -C $(KERNELDIR) M=$(PWD) modules_install How to change it so the generating result is .bc file not the .o file? PLEASE BE KIND AND HELP ME~~ --

...recently-built clang. n Linux, but we >>>> exercise osx build on our buildbots. >>>> We never build with compiler-rt not in projects/. >>>> Our bot scripts are here: >>>> >>>> https://code.google.com/p/address-sanitizer/source/browse/#svn%2Ftrunk%2Fbuild%2Fscripts%2Fslave >>>> The bots itself are not publicly visible, we hope to change that soon. >>>> >>>> > >>>> > And lastly, are there build instructions to build the Android shared >>>> object? >>>> > Is there...