search for: 2fsubscribe

...ujh1s,&typo=1> > > > This message has been sent on behalf of a company that is part of the Harris Operating Group of Constellation Software Inc. > > If you prefer not to be contacted by Harris Operating Group please notify us<https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2fsubscribe.harriscomputer.com%2f&c=E,1,ESghWsZAKB3kZUcHUH6MS2ivZGjhaE3linFZeLtQ96hbUtv37Esy1OON4XdoFr1DjlanYK_dt8Kie6diqCOVrkPalJ6KDLXEocN-5BFabl2AiHWvFfo3VvM,&typo=1>. > > > > This message is intended exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This communication...

Hi Leroy, How I can confirm that during rsync transfer corruption are not encountered? Thank you in advance. Il 01/07/20 16:04, Leroy Tennison ha scritto: > I've used rsync (but probably not for the size you're referring to), it works and has enough features to meet most needs. I have had a single situation where corruption occurred during transfer (a few times, have no idea why),

Once upon a time, Leroy Tennison <leroy at datavoiceint.com> said: > The executable could be placed on mounted read-only media That's not as secure as you think. Linux bind mounts can mount a file over another file (plus there's overlay filesystems), so it's possible to replace a binary even on a read-only device. -- Chris Adams <linux at cmadams.net>

Without context it's impossible to make firm statements but, having gone through this a while back (and discovering that less than 1 percent of an examined list of connections couldn't support current ssl - mainly Apple hardware), who do you want to protect? Is it the minority who won't/can't upgrade or the majority who have? And, do you have to protect yourself from liability