search for: 2fpull

.../02/2019 01:39 AM, Marcus Asteborg wrote: > Hi, > > > Here is a proposal for adding CMake in addition of Autotools. > > > See the attached patch for changes or the pull request here: > https://nam01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fxiph%2Fopus%2Fpull%2F100&amp;data=02%7C01%7C%7C47f897fd8d6e42c8336c08d6b739d457%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C636897856328827874&amp;sdata=ulSL9eGKj8cVt6VPufmkod061Ii56r%2FAsFXvOjyWu44%3D&amp;reserved=0 > <https://nam01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2F...

...rg wrote: >> Hi, >> >> >> Here is a proposal for adding CMake in addition of Autotools. >> >> >> See the attached patch for changes or the pull request here: >> https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fxiph%2Fopus%2Fpull%2F100&amp;data=02%7C01%7C%7C83448751302e4bd85a8908d6b79a58ab%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C636898270884177946&amp;sdata=Ed139jcES0woXrPabecRjGq7vGrnvpZJkRBQ8ty86Ys%3D&amp;reserved=0 >> <https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%...

...rote: >> Hi, >> >> >> Here is a proposal for adding CMake in addition of Autotools. >> >> >> See the attached patch for changes or the pull request here: >> https://nam01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fxiph%2Fopus%2Fpull%2F100&amp;data=02%7C01%7C%7C47f897fd8d6e42c8336c08d6b739d457%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C636897856328827874&amp;sdata=ulSL9eGKj8cVt6VPufmkod061Ii56r%2FAsFXvOjyWu44%3D&amp;reserved=0 >> <https://nam01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.co...

...gt; >>> >>> Here is a proposal for adding CMake in addition of Autotools. >>> >>> >>> See the attached patch for changes or the pull request here: >>> https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fxiph%2Fopus%2Fpull%2F100&amp;data=02%7C01%7C%7C83448751302e4bd85a8908d6b79a58ab%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C636898270884177946&amp;sdata=Ed139jcES0woXrPabecRjGq7vGrnvpZJkRBQ8ty86Ys%3D&amp;reserved=0 >>> <https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub....

Hi, Here is a proposal for adding CMake in addition of Autotools. See the attached patch for changes or the pull request here: https://github.com/xiph/opus/pull/100 The CMake scripts are parsing the filelist from Autotools, so only one file list needs to be maintained. With this change the checked in Visual Studio solution can be removed and no longer need to be maintained and updated when

This might be a little late but I was engaged in my university examinations. Moreover, I have an exam even today so apologies for the delay. Also, I had to change my project from weighting schemes to improve to improve estimated total number of results as weighting schemes was demanding a lot of time going through it. I would really appreciate if you could review my proposal asap.

Hello, This is an RFC for adding intrinsics which perform saturating signed/unsigned left shift. There is currently a patch on Phabricator here: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83216 The intrinsics are of the form i32 @llvm.sshl.sat.i32(i32, i32) i32 @llvm.ushl.sat.i32(i32, i32) <4 x i32> @llvm.sshl.sat.v4i32(<4 x i32>, <4 x i32>) <4 x i32>

On 25/01/2018 6:49 AM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > > On 25 January 2018 at 06:20, Duncan Murdoch wrote: > | On 25/01/2018 2:57 AM, I?aki ?car wrote: > | > For what it's worth, this is my workflow: > | > > | > 1. Get a fork. > | > 2. From the master branch, create a new branch called fix-[something]. > | > 3. Put together the stuff there, commit, push and