Displaying 20 results from an estimated 29 matches for "2fdocs".
2018 Nov 08
2
Building GC on statepoint-example
...cannot figure out how to access the Stack
> Map.
>
> The documentation for statepoint-example says:
>
> /The stack map format generated by this GC strategy can be found in
> theStack Map Section
> <https://nam03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fllvm.org%2Fdocs%2FStackMaps.html%23stackmap-section&data=02%7C01%7C%7Ce9642625652f4a29fc1f08d6403dfa73%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C636767032264647521&sdata=2cqSbyrmgxWfRh95yvOnwU6v42J1HRxI7dPwkSLARTY%3D&reserved=0>using
> a format documentedhere
> <https://nam03.safelinks...
2018 Nov 01
2
Building GC on statepoint-example
Hi,
I'm trying to build a gc using the statepoint-example strategy. However, after hours of searching, reading documentation and trying to find code examples online, I cannot figure out how to access the Stack Map.
The documentation for statepoint-example says:
The stack map format generated by this GC strategy can be found in the Stack Map
2018 Mar 30
0
Mapping virtual registers to physical registers
...NkAeIagO29GvgnsgoziKJ4U4zRUDXIZwQeuBXTC3NRd9iLtHz1IZhXsFCNmIC7QGkD278pz90U42sWT96yrGQLpPfsfpg05TFLkE_BGipWpMwKeLCYUqii7-0V9sOqCdVrNOfjC3Ruk9eeyMyFZS5pjXRNSNFElfHytB77QRZC87cWwM8aULV5KlIMMkmasWMWav7pb5xQc8VgqrXKzD2DtrP8F80Uyc48XqNNjuzvmT7TK7cDvvzhGtUvS4WXZfr-70e3-6fpQa4k&u=https%3A%2F%2Fllvm.org%2Fdocs%2FCodeGenerator.html%23mapping-virtual-registers-to-physical-registers> still valid ?
Are there other options to enforce the mapping of virtual registers to physical ones ?
TIA, Dominique Torette.
From: llvm-dev [mailto:llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org] On Behalf Of Dominique Torette...
2011 Mar 23
2
[LLVMdev] [GSoC] Interface layer for optimizers
...e who could mentor my GSoC project. If
there are any of you who can mentor the project, I prepare and send detailed
implementation plan here.
[1] http://llvm.org/docs/ProgrammersManual.html<https://owa.smachines.com/owa/redir.aspx?C=679f0475c3d14f849bfc90a4498f0d0f&URL=http%3a%2f%2fllvm.org%2fdocs%2fProgrammersManual.html>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20110323/fa6cdbae/attachment.html>
2018 Mar 29
4
Mapping virtual registers to physical registers
Hi,
In the context of MachineCode custom inserter, I'm trying to enforce the mapping of virtual register to a physical one.
According to the documentation https://llvm.org/docs/CodeGenerator.html#mapping-virtual-registers-to-physical-registers
There are two ways: the direct one and the indirect ones. The indirect ones refer VirtRegMap class that I've never found. So I tried the direct
2020 Jan 04
2
[EXTERNAL] Re: Delete Phabricator metadata tags before committing
...e other tags (Subscribers:, Reviewers:, Reviewed By:, Tags:, and the
> `Summary:` line) are not useful. They just clutter up the commit message.
> Shall we mention on https://llvm.org/docs/DeveloperPolicy.html
> <https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fllvm.org%2Fdocs%2FDeveloperPolicy.html&data=02%7C01%7Candya%40microsoft.com%7Cfa22dca30ad64a56b98508d78f940ec0%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C637135738379653343&sdata=zmn0lZLOQnbXm80S2tuHysCIOg9wwLp%2FI7D7csRkhm0%3D&reserved=0>
> that developers are recommended to delete metadata ta...
2019 Oct 01
2
PR43374 - when should comparing NaN values raise a floating point exception?
...;
> My question here is: how to fix this behaviour? Or: which part in the compilation flow is wrong?
> Reading through various standards and specifications, I’m getting confused to what the best fix would be:
>
> https://nam02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fllvm.org%2Fdocs%2FLangRef.html%23floating-point-environment&data=02%7C01%7CKevin.Neal%40sas.com%7C1c2441d90c5b4d3c4e6408d7467aa4cc%7Cb1c14d5c362545b3a4309552373a0c2f%7C0%7C0%7C637055364875886682&sdata=g5QujHhKvsyWLOZggSu45jIbW%2Bmf7BXForHwvo6%2FMoI%3D&reserved=0 states "The default LLV...
2016 Aug 05
0
HEIST https
Hey there,
today I've ridden about HEIST.
https://www.google.it/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=3&ved=0ahUKEwjP1_y84anOAhUIUhQKHaApBRYQFggsMAI&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.blackhat.com%2Fdocs%2Fus-16%2Fmaterials%2Fus-16-VanGoethem-HEIST-HTTP-Encrypted-Information-Can-Be-Stolen-Through-TCP-Windows-wp.pdf&usg=AFQjCNGF78yNRziN_1fTOzDTrsjmOC3IpA&bvm=bv.128617741,d.d24&cad=rja
What about Centos?
2020 Jan 06
2
[EXTERNAL] Re: Delete Phabricator metadata tags before committing
...s:, Reviewers:, Reviewed By:, Tags:, and the
>>> `Summary:` line) are not useful. They just clutter up the commit message.
>>> Shall we mention on https://llvm.org/docs/DeveloperPolicy.html
>>> <https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fllvm.org%2Fdocs%2FDeveloperPolicy.html&data=02%7C01%7Candya%40microsoft.com%7Cfa22dca30ad64a56b98508d78f940ec0%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C637135738379653343&sdata=zmn0lZLOQnbXm80S2tuHysCIOg9wwLp%2FI7D7csRkhm0%3D&reserved=0>
>>> that developers are recommended to delete met...
2018 Sep 04
2
NUT messes up UPS after mains power is restored
On 09/04/2018 12:36 PM, Ong, Kevin wrote:
>
> I think I know what I did wrong. In step 7, I plugged the mains too
> early causing a power race condition as described by point #51 here
> <https://networkupstools.org/docs/FAQ.html> . I thought that when APC
> BR1500GI's display went black (even with the fans still running) it is
> already in a shutdown state. This was not
2020 Jan 02
3
Delete Phabricator metadata tags before committing
I also find the "Reviewed by" tag useful (as well as the review link), for
the same reasons. In fact, I don't even use arcanist to push commits, so I
do it all by hand, and only include the "Reviewed by" and "Differential
Revision" tags.
On Fri, 27 Dec 2019 at 20:55, David Blaikie via llvm-dev <
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> I don't think
2018 Apr 03
1
Mapping virtual registers to physical registers
...YEoB
> nkpMsR5nmwxOwHxrg94ARv15Jkau47BqHfowR2wmELfIzFjh_umT7Vkr9jI9c6qcXoXvYb
> 5Kcvn9UXp5j4tOO58iozjnB9tHzCgUaZ6WKB8DV7xv6mS_2viUKUH6uVrHPT7rOBc6qTqL
> KQGnXVlZbRYkPIMz4nXqAE_hx5OTnCQuchlvSGaegNVz_YFL-j9TwL6mwpTBgzOcmlem_T
> fEo1SyMKgZDQ6UntyqHr_2Z1UA%3D%3D&u=https%3A%2F%2Fllvm.org%2Fdocs%2FCod
> eGenerator.html%23mapping-virtual-registers-to-physical-registers
>
> There are two ways: the direct one and the indirect ones. The indirect
> ones refer VirtRegMap class that I’ve never found. So I tried the
> direct one…
>
> Mapping virtual registers to physical r...
2011 Mar 23
1
[LLVMdev] [GSoC] Interface layer for optimizers
...project, I
> prepare and send detailed implementation plan here.
The superoptimizer idea looks kinda cool.
-- John T.
>
> [1] http://llvm.org/docs/ProgrammersManual.html
> <https://owa.smachines.com/owa/redir.aspx?C=679f0475c3d14f849bfc90a4498f0d0f&URL=http%3a%2f%2fllvm.org%2fdocs%2fProgrammersManual.html>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20110322/f424af40/attachment.html>
2015 Aug 17
4
Way to guarantee generated indirect call is via memory?
I'd like to generate an indirect call instruction that will end up as a call via memory and not register.
The address of the target is a constant.
For example, something like
%25 = load i64, i64* @get_Now
%26 = inttoptr i64 %25 to i64 ()*
%27 = call i64 %26()
may end up as
mov rsi,qword ptr [00007FF658381070]
call rsi
or as
call qword ptr [00007FF658381070]
If I want to
2019 Aug 05
2
LLVM crashing while trying to build SPEC with Clang
Hello,
I am building the SPEC 2006 Benchmark with Clang as the compiler. I have written a function pass in LLVM and I am trying to run that for SPEC by invoking the pass in the build options of SPEC. The build options of SPEC are in a *.cfg config file, which allows us to specify the choice of compiler while building SPEC. (https://www.spec.org/cpu2006/Docs/install-guide-unix.html)
The pass
2024 May 03
1
Samba AD not listening on ipv4 - 464/tcp
On Fri, 03 May 2024 10:11:48 +0200
PaLi via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
> Hello
>
> I'm not able to connect to Samba AD domain by realm.
>
> sudo realm join OFFICE.COMPANY.COM -U administrator
>
> Password for administrator:
> See: journalctl REALMD_OPERATION=r41422.307314
> realm: Couldn't join realm: Failed to join the domain
>
>
2020 Sep 03
3
using experimental intrinsics failed
Hi:
Sorry I need to send email directly. I am new to llvm and trying to write interval arithmetic, which requires changing rounding mode during computation.
The document I found https://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html#constrained-floating-point-intrinsics, seems to be doing the trick. Here is the piece of code that I did:
2024 May 03
1
Samba AD not listening on ipv4 - 464/tcp
...https://access.redhat.com/bounce/?externalURL=https%3A%2F%2Fblogs.technet.microsoft.com%2Factivedirectoryua%2F2010%2F08%2F04%2Fconditions-for-kerberos-to-be-used-over-an-external-trust%2F
[3] Technologies for Federating Multiple Forests
https://access.redhat.com/bounce/?externalURL=https%3A%2F%2Fdocs.microsoft.com%2Fen-us%2Fprevious-versions%2Fwindows%2Fit-pro%2Fwindows-server-2003%2Fdd560679%28v%3Dws.10%29
2020 Jul 26
2
[LAA] RtCheck on pointers of different address spaces.
...tant (address space 4, addr_size = 64) and the other from local, LDS (address space 3, addr_size= 32).
(Details of various address spaces available for AMDGPU backend: https://llvm.org/docs/AMDGPUUsage.html#address-spaces<https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fllvm.org%2Fdocs%2FAMDGPUUsage.html%23address-spaces&data=02%7C01%7CChristudasan.Devadasan%40amd.com%7C4a42db7316004baa429c08d83160f7e7%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C637313639833494292&sdata=r7fk%2FU%2FCZLt8RKZNc0lAco6wBJKKDj%2Br621r%2FaBOI6A%3D&reserved=0>)
With upstream compiler, th...
2020 Apr 28
2
[RFC] DWARF Version 6 Proposal For Heterogeneous Debugging
Hi Scott,
It's possible they've missed it, so I've explicitly CC'ed a number of the
usual DWARF suspects, at least some of whom are on the standards committee.
I don't have anything specific to add myself.
James
On Mon, 27 Apr 2020 at 15:25, via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> I don't know what an acceptable ping rate on an RFC is, but I also