search for: 2f87af6f

...not a local problem, I've tested the signature of the Samba_CA.crt file (http://us4.samba.org/samba/ftp/) and it's ok. Can someone else please confirm it? Thanks. - Ademar $ gpg --verify Samba_CA.crt.asc Samba_CA.crt gpg: Signature made Tue 06 May 2003 12:55:54 PM BRT using DSA key ID 2F87AF6F gpg: Good signature from "Samba Distribution Verification Key <samba-bugs@samba.org>" gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature! gpg: There is no indication that the signature belongs to the owner. Primary key fingerprint: 3275 F01D 6565 3A81 AE7B 32...

This is probably nothing but when I did. $ gpg --import samba-pubkey.asc $ gpg --verify samba-release.tar.[bz2|gz].asc I got the following response gpg: Signature made Tue 26 Nov 2002 07:12:04 PM CST using DSA key ID 2F87AF6F gpg: Good signature from "Samba Distribution Verification Key " but then I also got the following. Could not find a valid trust path to the key. Let's see whether we can assign some missing owner trust values. No path leading to one of our keys found gpg: Warning...

Hello What should I do in this case? It seems the signature of Samba sources is bad. I tried downloading from CZ and FI mirrors and both had the same problem. I got this key by bash-2.05b$ gpg --keyserver wwwkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 2F87AF6F gpgkeys: WARNING: this is an *experimental* HKP interface! gpg: key 2F87AF6F: "Samba Distribution Verification Key <samba-bugs@samba.org>" not changed gpg: Total number processed: 1 gpg: unchanged: 1 bash-2.05b$ gpg --verify samba-3.0.2.tar.asc samba-3.0.2.tar.gz gpg:...

...package for redhat 9 I tried to install it on a test workstation where all redhat 9 packages are installed (with the adition xfs from sgi). Apt-get couldn't solve this dependencies and rpmfind.net freshrpms.net also not. Warnung: samba-3.0alpha24-1.i386.rpm: V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID 2f87af6f Fehler: Failed dependencies: perl(Net::LDAP::LDIF) is needed by samba-3.0alpha24-1 Does somebody know how I could solve this dependencies? Thanks Peter

...of this year about upgrading samba 3.0.3-5 to samba 3.0.4-1? I too am having that same problem. I am upgrading from Samba 3.0.3-5 to 3.0.6, and get errors regarding dependencies. Ex: # rpm -U samba-common-3.0.6-1.i386.rpm warning: samba-common-3.0.6-1.i386.rpm: V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID 2f87af6f error: Failed dependencies: samba-common = 0:3.0.3 is needed by (installed) samba-3.0.3-5 samba-common = 0:3.0.3 is needed by (installed) samba-client-3.0.3 BTW, I'm using FC2. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Ben Link: http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2004-...

-----Original Message----- From: Stephen Collier Sent: Thursday, 2 October 2003 10:26 AM To: 'Gerald (Jerry) Carter' Subject: RE: [Samba] Samba 3.0.0 rpms Jerry, Thanks for the prompt reply. I obtained them from us1.samba.org and au1.samba.org I tried from both sites. It seems so strange as rc2, rc3 and rc4 installed perfectly. We were getting problems with them with current (up2date

...one I am attemping to install Samba 3 on but i get this conflict with version 2.2.7a that came with RH 9. I can not remove it. I have tried several methods and it still there cause 3.0 will not install. Here is the error I get: warning: samba-3.0.2a-1_rh9.i386.rpm: V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID 2f87af6f file /etc/rc.d/init.d/winbind from install of samba-3.0.2a-1 conflicts w ith file from package samba-common-2.2.7a-7.9.0 file /etc/samba/smb.conf from install of samba-3.0.2a-1 conflicts with f ile from package samba-common-2.2.7a-7.9.0 file /lib/libnss_winbind.so.2 from ins...