Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "2f17c2b9".
2014 Mar 03
3
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] C++11 reverse iterators (was C++11 is here)
...o the property model). I don't feel strongly against it, but we pretty consistently use the Java style 'get' prefix everywhere else.
-Chris
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20140303/2f17c2b9/attachment.html>
2014 Mar 03
3
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] C++11 reverse iterators (was C++11 is here)
On Mar 2, 2014, at 10:47 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> wrote:
>> I'm not aware of the prior art or standards are here, but I think that a global reverse() adapter is the way to go. Likewise, we should have a standard "enumerate()" adaptor like python.
>>
>> I definitely prefer the global adaptor pattern. As for prior art, I had played with