Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "2f09".
Did you mean:
2009
2015 Nov 23
3
COFF::IMAGE_REL_AMD64_REL32 relocation overflow when compiling for x86_64
...cdea4217b5ead441afcf508d2f3fc3084%7c72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7c1&sdata=Ykf6luCK%2f2N%2bWIfoJ2xCjeUPQcAvUo70IsWas%2boRido%3d>* Seaboard
> GRAND, celebrated as the “**piano of the future*
> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3a%2f%2fedition.cnn.com%2f2013%2f09%2f27%2ftech%2finnovation%2fhans-zimmer-seaboard-future-piano%2f&data=01%7c01%7candya%40microsoft.com%7cdea4217b5ead441afcf508d2f3fc3084%7c72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7c1&sdata=F3ZwPreXW3KJcEwCzim4YG%2ftGYGrzT8yCS9lQ7pD4Tw%3d>*”,
> is now joined by the **Seaboard RISE*
> <ht...
2015 Nov 23
2
COFF::IMAGE_REL_AMD64_REL32 relocation overflow when compiling for x86_64
Some time ago I posted here regarding a relocation overflow on Windows
(among other things), but the issue disappeared and so the thread got left.
I've started this new thread because a) I didn't want to necro the old one
and b) it felt like its own.
I've now encountered the issue again and am noting down all the information
I can get about it whilst it's happening.
The issues is
2009 Oct 03
1
NTLM
...lked about. He sent me this URL:
http://blogs.technet.com/dbordini/archive/2008/09/03/browser-navega-o-e-seguran-a-estudo-de-caso.aspx
I translated it with Google and seems that make some sense:
http://translate.google.com.br/translate?u=http%3A%2F%2Fblogs.technet.com%2Fdbordini%2Farchive%2F2008%2F09%2F03%2Fbrowser-navega-o-e-seguran-a-estudo-de-caso.aspx&sl=pt&tl=en&hl=pt-BR&ie=UTF-8
Trying to resume all the whole stuff, he's complaining that Firefox
automatically decreased the safety level to NTLM (not using NTLMv2),
when used with Windows Vista, without warning the user...
2015 Oct 19
2
[cfe-dev] Orc Windows C++
First of all, thanks very much to Lang for fixing the BSS section bug; works like a charm!
I’ve been unable to reproduce the 32 bit relocation on 64 bit code (I’ll let you know if I do). However, I’m still having issues with resolving the 64 bit symbol relocations. In case it’s relevant, the specific symbol my program is tripping up on is IID_IOleObject, where TargetAddress is dereferenced
2011 Dec 01
1
[LLVMdev] [llvm-testresults] bwilson__llvm-gcc_PROD__i386 nightly tester results
...b_default/simple/nts/380/graph?pset.0=on&test.SingleSource%2FUnitTests%2F2003-05-31-CastToBool.compile=on>
> 2.08% 0.0288 0.0294 0.0001
> External/SPEC/CINT95/099_go/099_go.compile
> <http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/simple/nts/380/graph?pset.0=on&test.External%2FSPEC%2FCINT95%2F099_go%2F099_go.compile=on>
> 2.08% 4.6727 4.7699 0.0061
> SingleSource/UnitTests/2006-01-23-UnionInit.compile
> <http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/simple/nts/380/graph?pset.0=on&test.SingleSource%2FUnitTests%2F2006-01-23-UnionInit.compile=on>
> 2.07% 0.0290 0.0296 0.0001
> S...