Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "2ece0c4".
Did you mean:
2e330c4
2017 Feb 08
0
[PATCH 2/2] locking/mutex, rwsem: Reduce vcpu_is_preempted() calling frequency
...y of once every 256 iterations.
Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman at redhat.com>
---
kernel/locking/mutex.c | 5 ++++-
kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c | 6 ++++--
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/locking/mutex.c b/kernel/locking/mutex.c
index ad2d9e2..2ece0c4 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/mutex.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/mutex.c
@@ -423,6 +423,7 @@ bool mutex_spin_on_owner(struct mutex *lock, struct task_struct *owner,
struct ww_acquire_ctx *ww_ctx, struct mutex_waiter *waiter)
{
bool ret = true;
+ int loop = 0;
rcu_read_lock();
while (__mutex_o...
2017 Feb 08
4
[PATCH 1/2] x86/paravirt: Don't make vcpu_is_preempted() a callee-save function
It was found when running fio sequential write test with a XFS ramdisk
on a 2-socket x86-64 system, the %CPU times as reported by perf were
as follows:
71.27% 0.28% fio [k] down_write
70.99% 0.01% fio [k] call_rwsem_down_write_failed
69.43% 1.18% fio [k] rwsem_down_write_failed
65.51% 54.57% fio [k] osq_lock
9.72% 7.99% fio [k] __raw_callee_save___kvm_vcpu_is_preempted
4.16%
2017 Feb 08
4
[PATCH 1/2] x86/paravirt: Don't make vcpu_is_preempted() a callee-save function
It was found when running fio sequential write test with a XFS ramdisk
on a 2-socket x86-64 system, the %CPU times as reported by perf were
as follows:
71.27% 0.28% fio [k] down_write
70.99% 0.01% fio [k] call_rwsem_down_write_failed
69.43% 1.18% fio [k] rwsem_down_write_failed
65.51% 54.57% fio [k] osq_lock
9.72% 7.99% fio [k] __raw_callee_save___kvm_vcpu_is_preempted
4.16%