Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "2eb747e4".
2013 Jan 08
0
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] LTO "bug" and Clang warnings
On 1/8/2013 1:11 PM, Renato Golin wrote:
>
> Still, doesn't explicitly say it's undefined. I agree this gives the
> freedom of implementers to extend naturally, but it's at least arguable.
> I have the 2011 draft and couldn't find anything, nor in the current
> open issues.
It does, actually:
C++ 2003 [5.7.5]
When an expression that has integral type is added to
2013 Jan 08
4
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] LTO "bug" and Clang warnings
On 8 January 2013 18:40, Matthieu Monrocq <matthieu.monrocq at gmail.com>wrote:
> I do believe it's undefined.
>
> §5.2.1 Subscripting [expr.sub]
> ...
> §5.7 Additive operators [expr.add]
> ...
>
Still, doesn't explicitly say it's undefined. I agree this gives the
freedom of implementers to extend naturally, but it's at least arguable. I
have the 2011