search for: 2e5bfbfd

>From Martin's isolinux.bin.20170324, I (kind of) understand the first 3 bytes: 33 ED 90 Then, the next "90"s are probably originiated from the "nop"s in: http://repo.or.cz/syslinux.git/blobdiff/c210e571f61eeb898fadbb6f47d4a2c8 2e5bfbfd..2c3a24e5f4b807ec31595227afa59a818c060ca9:/mbr/isohdpfx.S So, why the original isohybrid image from Debian and many other isohybrid images have mostly (but not all) "00s" in place of the "90s"? (Considering that these images are generated mostly by xorriso, perhaps Thomas m...

Hi, Gene Cumm wrote: > it seems the stack format got > set, changed, then mostly reverted back, with this code being the last > piece missing from 2009. The commit to isohdpfx.S of 2009-05-31 looks incomplete. The sequence of the stack pointers was swapped, but the sequence of stack pushes was not.