search for: 2d3

Has anybody tried running Xen on an ALIX 2D3 board? http://www.pcengines.ch/alix2d3.htm If not, has anybody ran Xen on a seriously underpowered PC? The reason why I love these boards so much is that they run at 5W! Of course, I would only run Xen on these for testing purposes. It would just be nice to have a very low powered system that...

...to act as a DC etc. [At least > none that I'm aware of and would trust.] > > Even appliances sorta like this, that I've seen, are easily five times the > price. > > -Greg > Howcome no one has though of this before?? What is the "Samba equivalent", as the Alix 2D3 is for SOHO routers?? There's a market gap right there... Or maybe I am the one who thinks this way? Still, thanks for your advice! You are right, so far Optiplexes or similar pretty much fulfill all the requirementes I mentioned before: they are cheap, good looking, silent and with some care...

Okay, so trying a straight compile of the Python interpreter with clang-cl, I used the following commands: cd \python-2.7.10\pcbuild copy C:\llvm\build\Release\bin\clang-cl.exe cl.exe rd /q /s amd64 rd /q /s win32-temp-debug rd /q /s win32-temp-release rd /q /s x64-temp-debug rd /q /s x64-temp-release msbuild /p:Configuration=Release /v:diag /fileLogger pcbuild.sln (The second line is the one

...a DC etc. [At least >> none that I'm aware of and would trust.] >> >> Even appliances sorta like this, that I've seen, are easily five times the >> price. > > Howcome no one has though of this before?? What is the "Samba equivalent", > as the Alix 2D3 is for SOHO routers?? There's a market gap right there... Tbh, you might get away with using PCEngines' APU boards (the successor to their Alix boards with a massively upgraded CPU) if individual machines don't need RAID (because everything is replicated anyway). > Or maybe I am th...

...9;m aware of and would trust.] > > > > Even appliances sorta like this, that I've seen, are easily five times > the > > price. > > > > -Greg > > > > Howcome no one has though of this before?? What is the "Samba equivalent", > as the Alix 2D3 is for SOHO routers?? There's a market gap right there... > Or maybe I am the one who thinks this way? > > Still, thanks for your advice! You are right, so far Optiplexes or similar > pretty much fulfill all the requirementes I mentioned before: they are > cheap, good looking, si...

Hello For users who 1) don't have a QoS-capable ADSL router and 2) would like to run Asterisk with a couple of SIP trunks, I was wondering what hardware is recommend to run any of the main open-source *WRT projects to which Asterisk has been ported: (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_wireless_router_firmware_projects Thank you.

Hello, I'm about to deploy Samba PDC and several BDCs. As far as I understand Samba and domain logons, this means that a user will be able to log onto any server, with his workstation choosing a domain controller that is probably the closest/fastest etc. one. As a consequence, this also means, that on each server there has to be a copy of a profile of a given user, right? If so, how can

Hi team! At work I have several small branch offices with ~5 PCs each. All PCs are member of a Samba4 domain, whose DCs are on the headquarters (linked by consumer grade VPNs) I want to ship "some small, cheap, reliable and magical device" to each branch, in order to provide just 2 things: * AD replication * File shares That't it, period. Nothing fancy. Suggestions??? What do you

Hi, I'm looking for a good network device that does bandwidth management. It can be integrated in a router or stand-alone, but must be SIP-friendly. I`ve tried the DIR-655 (latest firmware is SIP-hostile, and the latest hardware revisions can't downgrade to the version that worked well) and the DI-724GU (SIP-friendly, but bandwidth management is automated and not configurable

...ash-function-parens pass ./check.t:integer-base-one-1 pass ./check.t:integer-base-one-2a pass ./check.t:integer-base-one-2b pass ./check.t:integer-base-one-2c1 pass ./check.t:integer-base-one-2c2 pass ./check.t:integer-base-one-2d1 pass ./check.t:integer-base-one-2d2 pass ./check.t:integer-base-one-2d3 pass ./check.t:integer-base-one-2d4 pass ./check.t:integer-base-one-2d5 pass ./check.t:integer-base-one-2d6 pass ./check.t:integer-base-one-3As pass ./check.t:integer-base-one-3Ws pass ./check.t:integer-base-one-3Ar pass ./check.t:integer-base-one-3Wr pass ./check.t:integer-base-one-4 pass ./check....

On Wed, 9 Oct 2013 10:44:27 +0000 (UTC) Thorsten Glaser <tg at mirbsd.de> wrote: > Anil Singhar dixit: > > >Manual testing as provided within the package has been done with all > >tests passing. This includes the units tests available under > >usr/klibc/tests, usr/utils, usr/dash and usr/gzip. For dash and > >gzip, only sanity testing has been done. > >