search for: 2bsamba

...out to use the source, but can anyone give me any pointers? I also looked at <http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=utf-8&threadm=2d947vo q7e1rlatse397lr7sh6hosu8f6g%404ax.com&rnum=1&prev=/groups%3Fhl%3Den%26lr%3D% 26ie%3DUTF-8%26oe%3Dutf-8%26q%3Dxp%2Bpro%2Bsamba%2Bjoin%2Bdomain%2B%2522digi tally%2Bencrypt%2522%26btnG%3DGoogle%2BSearch> and followed the instructions there, but trying to join the domain as machineadmin just returns "The user name could not be found.". A

Hi, I was having problem with the tdbsam backend in which a particular user got listed twice with pdbedit. (http://www.mail-archive.com/samba at lists.samba.org/msg109110.html) Without much hope in fixing it, I am planning to re-generating passdb.tdb on my PDC by: (1)exporting tdbsam to smbpasswd backend (2)delete passdb.tdb (3)re-import smbpasswd to tdbsam backend With the command `

Hi all, I have a problem with newly created users beeing not able to login at our Windows clients. We have debian linux with Samba 3.01 running as PDC and fileserver. I create the linux users first with useradd and then the samba users with smbpasswd. There are existing machine accounts for all the workstations and users that exist already for quite some time can login at the workstations. But

Hi, my Situation: a w2k-server set in mixed mode as ADS-Server,a debian machine with latest stable samba compiled self with ADS-support. samba machine joined to ADS-Domain succesfully, winbindd installed and configured, all w2k users and groups visible on samba-server. Browsing and connecting to w2k-server and samba-server from the samba server with smbclient and -k option works fine for all

On 20/08/15 18:26, Guilherme Boing wrote: > Yes, you are correct. > > The users where the UID 3000000 was the owner were users that belong to > Domain Admins group. > Is this the correct behaviour ? I have other users that are in different > groups (e.g. Marketing) and whenever they create a new file, their own UID > shows up as the owner of that file, not the