Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "2bllvmdev".
2009 Mar 30
0
[LLVMdev] GSoC 2009: Extending LLVM IR to aid multi-core code generation
...last week or so where the
intrinsics/pseudo-function idea has been raised. Perhaps what llvm really
needs is a 'generic' pseudo-intrinsic of some kind?
2009/3/30 Milos Puzovic <milos.puzovic at gmail.com>
> 2009/3/30 someguy <just.s0m3.guy+llvmdev at gmail.com<just.s0m3.guy%2Bllvmdev at gmail.com>
> >
>
>> Can you not achieve the same effect without adding intrinsics? Insert
>> function calls to a __spawn and __join pseudo-function instead?
>>
> It would make LLVM code generation more difficult because instead of
> building a new instruction...
2009 Mar 30
4
[LLVMdev] GSoC 2009: Extending LLVM IR to aid multi-core code generation
2009/3/30 someguy
<just.s0m3.guy+llvmdev at gmail.com<just.s0m3.guy%2Bllvmdev at gmail.com>
>
> Can you not achieve the same effect without adding intrinsics? Insert
> function calls to a __spawn and __join pseudo-function instead?
>
It would make LLVM code generation more difficult because instead of
building a new instruction (in this case intrinsic) you wi...
2009 Mar 30
0
[LLVMdev] GSoC 2009: Extending LLVM IR to aid multi-core code generation
Can you not achieve the same effect without adding intrinsics? Insert
function calls to a __spawn and __join pseudo-function instead?
2009/3/30 Milos Puzovic <milos.puzovic at gmail.com>
> Hi Nicolas,
>
> 2009/3/30 Nicolas Geoffray <nicolas.geoffray at lip6.fr>
>
>> Can you be more verbose on this? Are you planning to implement some JVM
>> or .Net extension
2009 Mar 23
0
[LLVMdev] Wiki?
...,
>
> Aaron
>
> On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 3:58 PM, Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin.org>
> wrote:
> > As soon as i get out of this meeting I will
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 3:22 PM, someguy
> > <just.s0m3.guy+llvmdev at gmail.com <just.s0m3.guy%2Bllvmdev at gmail.com>>
> wrote:
> >> Daniel, can you set up the virtual host please?
> >>
> >> On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 9:02 PM, John Criswell <criswell at cs.uiuc.edu>
> >> wrote:
> >>> John Criswell wrote:
> >>>> someguy wrote:...
2009 Mar 30
2
[LLVMdev] GSoC 2009: Extending LLVM IR to aid multi-core code generation
Hi Nicolas,
2009/3/30 Nicolas Geoffray <nicolas.geoffray at lip6.fr>
> Can you be more verbose on this? Are you planning to implement some JVM
> or .Net extension for supporting your new intrinsics? Or are you just
> looking for a runtime with a GC?
At the moment I am not looking to add any new extensions to JVM or .NET. I
would need a runtime with a GC to demonstrate and test
2009 Mar 20
2
[LLVMdev] Wiki?
>Done
Yay, we got Wiki, now I can do some wicked UML diagrams for LLVM, he, he, he
:)
Many thanks,
Aaron
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 3:58 PM, Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin.org> wrote:
> As soon as i get out of this meeting I will
>
> On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 3:22 PM, someguy
> <just.s0m3.guy+llvmdev at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Daniel, can you set up the virtual
2009 Mar 18
1
[LLVMdev] Shrink Wrapping - RFC and initial implementation
Hi John.
> I am putting this information
> into my temp. wiki page in hopes of getting it into the dev wiki when
> that is available.
The dev wiki is up at its temporary name http://google2.osuosl.org/wiki/.
Feel free to dump your stuff on there.
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 7:43 PM, John Mosby <ojomojo at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Evan,
> Thanks very much for the review, I am