Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "2bd6cc05".
2012 Jun 22
4
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] is configure+make dead yet?
...if you're like me and totally clueless when it comes to cmake, it's
downright confusing.
--
Joshua Cranmer
News submodule owner
DXR coauthor
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120622/2bd6cc05/attachment.html>
2012 Jun 21
0
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] is configure+make dead yet?
On Jun 20, 2012, at 5:13 PM, Nick Lewycky <nlewycky at google.com> wrote:
> Is there anybody who is certain that our autoconf dependency needs to stay around? Are there developers stuck on systems that don't have a recent enough cmake in their most recent release, or maybe are using some features from configure+make that the cmake build system doesn't implement?
>
> If
2012 Jun 21
27
[LLVMdev] is configure+make dead yet?
Is there anybody who is certain that our autoconf dependency needs to stay
around? Are there developers stuck on systems that don't have a recent
enough cmake in their most recent release, or maybe are using some features
from configure+make that the cmake build system doesn't implement?
If nobody pipes up, I might actually try actually removing it!
Nick
-------------- next part