search for: 2b0xcompilersupport

Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "2b0xcompilersupport".

2013 Jan 13
2
[LLVMdev] Using C++'11 language features in LLVM itself
.... I would advise people > who want a closer look to check the Apache page summing up the compiler > capabilities by themselves. > > > -- Matthieu. > > > PS: thanks to Stephen Kelly for showing me how to use gmane to barge in. > > [1]: http://wiki.apache.org/stdcxx/C%2B%2B0xCompilerSupport > > [2]: "decltype v1.0 (n2343)" is subsided by "decltype v1.1 (n3276)" which drops > the completeness requirement of return types; unfortunately it seems no known > version of gcc implements v1.1. > > [3]: "r-value v2.1 (n2844 + core issue 1138)" is...
2013 Jan 13
0
[LLVMdev] Using C++'11 language features in LLVM itself
...might prove helpful in the upcoming decision. I would advise people who want a closer look to check the Apache page summing up the compiler capabilities by themselves. -- Matthieu. PS: thanks to Stephen Kelly for showing me how to use gmane to barge in. [1]: http://wiki.apache.org/stdcxx/C%2B%2B0xCompilerSupport [2]: "decltype v1.0 (n2343)" is subsided by "decltype v1.1 (n3276)" which drops the completeness requirement of return types; unfortunately it seems no known version of gcc implements v1.1. [3]: "r-value v2.1 (n2844 + core issue 1138)" is subsided by "r-value v3...
2013 Jan 13
0
[LLVMdev] Using C++'11 language features in LLVM itself
...t a closer look to check the Apache page summing up the compiler >> capabilities by themselves. >> >> >> -- Matthieu. >> >> >> PS: thanks to Stephen Kelly for showing me how to use gmane to barge in. >> >> [1]: http://wiki.apache.org/stdcxx/C%2B%2B0xCompilerSupport >> >> [2]: "decltype v1.0 (n2343)" is subsided by "decltype v1.1 (n3276)" which drops >> the completeness requirement of return types; unfortunately it seems no known >> version of gcc implements v1.1. >> >> [3]: "r-value v2.1 (n2844 + co...
2013 Jan 11
4
[LLVMdev] Using C++'11 language features in LLVM itself
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 11:32 AM, Sebastian Redl <sebastian.redl at getdesigned.at> wrote: > > On 11.01.2013, at 20:08, Eli Bendersky wrote: > >>>> I suppose this tradeoff can be evaluated by looking at the delta >>>> between 4.5 and 4.6 which is actually supported by MSVC 2010 and Clang >>>> 3.1 >>> >>> Makes perfect sense to
2013 Jan 09
1
[LLVMdev] Using C++'11 language features in LLVM itself
Sean Silva <silvas at purdue.edu> writes: > On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 6:45 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: >> some version of GCC and later (linux folks should pick?) > > 4.6 is the official compiler on Ubuntu 12.04 (released 04/2012), which > is the latest Long Term Support release (which come out every 2 years, > with 3 years desktop support and 5
2013 Jan 13
2
[LLVMdev] Using C++'11 language features in LLVM itself
...ing up the compiler > >> capabilities by themselves. > >> > >> > >> -- Matthieu. > >> > >> > >> PS: thanks to Stephen Kelly for showing me how to use gmane to barge in. > >> > >> [1]: http://wiki.apache.org/stdcxx/C%2B%2B0xCompilerSupport > >> > >> [2]: "decltype v1.0 (n2343)" is subsided by "decltype v1.1 (n3276)" > which drops > >> the completeness requirement of return types; unfortunately it seems no > known > >> version of gcc implements v1.1. > >> > >...