Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "2b0xcompilersupport".
2013 Jan 13
2
[LLVMdev] Using C++'11 language features in LLVM itself
.... I would advise people
> who want a closer look to check the Apache page summing up the compiler
> capabilities by themselves.
>
>
> -- Matthieu.
>
>
> PS: thanks to Stephen Kelly for showing me how to use gmane to barge in.
>
> [1]: http://wiki.apache.org/stdcxx/C%2B%2B0xCompilerSupport
>
> [2]: "decltype v1.0 (n2343)" is subsided by "decltype v1.1 (n3276)" which drops
> the completeness requirement of return types; unfortunately it seems no known
> version of gcc implements v1.1.
>
> [3]: "r-value v2.1 (n2844 + core issue 1138)" is...
2013 Jan 13
0
[LLVMdev] Using C++'11 language features in LLVM itself
...might prove helpful in the upcoming decision. I would advise people
who want a closer look to check the Apache page summing up the compiler
capabilities by themselves.
-- Matthieu.
PS: thanks to Stephen Kelly for showing me how to use gmane to barge in.
[1]: http://wiki.apache.org/stdcxx/C%2B%2B0xCompilerSupport
[2]: "decltype v1.0 (n2343)" is subsided by "decltype v1.1 (n3276)" which drops
the completeness requirement of return types; unfortunately it seems no known
version of gcc implements v1.1.
[3]: "r-value v2.1 (n2844 + core issue 1138)" is subsided by "r-value v3...
2013 Jan 13
0
[LLVMdev] Using C++'11 language features in LLVM itself
...t a closer look to check the Apache page summing up the compiler
>> capabilities by themselves.
>>
>>
>> -- Matthieu.
>>
>>
>> PS: thanks to Stephen Kelly for showing me how to use gmane to barge in.
>>
>> [1]: http://wiki.apache.org/stdcxx/C%2B%2B0xCompilerSupport
>>
>> [2]: "decltype v1.0 (n2343)" is subsided by "decltype v1.1 (n3276)" which drops
>> the completeness requirement of return types; unfortunately it seems no known
>> version of gcc implements v1.1.
>>
>> [3]: "r-value v2.1 (n2844 + co...
2013 Jan 11
4
[LLVMdev] Using C++'11 language features in LLVM itself
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 11:32 AM, Sebastian Redl
<sebastian.redl at getdesigned.at> wrote:
>
> On 11.01.2013, at 20:08, Eli Bendersky wrote:
>
>>>> I suppose this tradeoff can be evaluated by looking at the delta
>>>> between 4.5 and 4.6 which is actually supported by MSVC 2010 and Clang
>>>> 3.1
>>>
>>> Makes perfect sense to
2013 Jan 09
1
[LLVMdev] Using C++'11 language features in LLVM itself
Sean Silva <silvas at purdue.edu> writes:
> On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 6:45 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote:
>> some version of GCC and later (linux folks should pick?)
>
> 4.6 is the official compiler on Ubuntu 12.04 (released 04/2012), which
> is the latest Long Term Support release (which come out every 2 years,
> with 3 years desktop support and 5
2013 Jan 13
2
[LLVMdev] Using C++'11 language features in LLVM itself
...ing up the compiler
> >> capabilities by themselves.
> >>
> >>
> >> -- Matthieu.
> >>
> >>
> >> PS: thanks to Stephen Kelly for showing me how to use gmane to barge in.
> >>
> >> [1]: http://wiki.apache.org/stdcxx/C%2B%2B0xCompilerSupport
> >>
> >> [2]: "decltype v1.0 (n2343)" is subsided by "decltype v1.1 (n3276)"
> which drops
> >> the completeness requirement of return types; unfortunately it seems no
> known
> >> version of gcc implements v1.1.
> >>
> >...