search for: 2a9c1d0c

Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "2a9c1d0c".

2011 Jul 27
0
[LLVMdev] Proposal for better assertions in LLVM
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 3:31 PM, Talin <viridia at gmail.com> wrote: > Can you explain how it avoids evaluating the arguments in the false case? I > looked at the code but it's pretty complex. > Essentially it expands to something like: !(Ty == STy) ? (void)0 : Voidifier() & llvm::dbgs() << ... where you have something vaguely along the lines of struct Voidifier {
2011 Jul 27
3
[LLVMdev] Proposal for better assertions in LLVM
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 12:51 AM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com>wrote: > On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 10:41 AM, Talin <viridia at gmail.com> wrote: > >> The assertions in LLVM would be a lot more useful if they could print out >> not only the source code of the expression that failed, but also print the >> values of the various arguments. To that end, I