search for: 29f8cb06

Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "29f8cb06".

2020 Aug 31
2
Proposal to remove MMX support.
...re > complex to implement at that level, versus in the headers, and doesn't > leave a path towards eliminating the builtins in the future. > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20200831/29f8cb06/attachment-0001.html>
2020 Aug 30
3
Proposal to remove MMX support.
I recently diagnosed a bug in someone else's software, which turned out to be due to incorrect MMX intrinsics usage: if you use any of the x86 intrinsics that accept or return __m64 values, then you, the *programmer* are required to call _mm_empty() before using any x87 floating point instructions or leaving the function. I was aware that this was required at the assembly-level, but not that