Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "29f8cb06".
2020 Aug 31
2
Proposal to remove MMX support.
...re
> complex to implement at that level, versus in the headers, and doesn't
> leave a path towards eliminating the builtins in the future.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20200831/29f8cb06/attachment-0001.html>
2020 Aug 30
3
Proposal to remove MMX support.
I recently diagnosed a bug in someone else's software, which turned out to
be due to incorrect MMX intrinsics usage: if you use any of the x86
intrinsics that accept or return __m64 values, then you, the *programmer* are
required to call _mm_empty() before using any x87 floating point
instructions or leaving the function. I was aware that this was required at
the assembly-level, but not that