search for: 29bbf260

On 01.06.2012, at 08:14, Kostya Serebryany wrote: > > > On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 7:13 AM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > On May 31, 2012, at 6:48 PM, Chandler Carruth wrote: >> I'm not sure that this solves the problem. The reason we have dual licenses for the runtime stuff is that we don't want the UIUC license (which has a binary attribution

On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 7:13 AM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > On May 31, 2012, at 6:48 PM, Chandler Carruth wrote: > > I'm not sure that this solves the problem. The reason we have dual >> licenses for the runtime stuff is that we don't want the UIUC license >> (which has a binary attribution clause) to affect stuff built with the >>

...opers mailing list > > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120601/29bbf260/attachment.html>