search for: 2999c95f0

Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "2999c95f0".

Did you mean: 2999950
2017 Nov 26
2
Have any FreeBSD users tried the new libusb-1.0 branch?
Charles Lepple writes: > still looking for volunteers to test the libusb-1.0 code on FreeBSD and > other systems. On Fedora 27, running commit 2999c95f0: # nut-scanner Cannot load USB library (/usr/lib64/libusb-1.0.so.0.1.0) : /usr/lib64/libusb-1.0.so.0.1.0: undefined symbol: usb_get_string_simple. USB search disabled. There's also a bug in the configure script on 64 bit Fedora. The configure script sets systemdsystemshutdowndir to /usr...
2017 Nov 26
0
Have any FreeBSD users tried the new libusb-1.0 branch?
On Nov 26, 2017, at 3:15 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote: > > Charles Lepple writes: > >> still looking for volunteers to test the libusb-1.0 code on FreeBSD and other systems. > > On Fedora 27, running commit 2999c95f0: Thanks for checking this. I should have been more clear in the second email in the thread, but commit 2999c95f0 is on the original "libusb-1.0" branch, which had a bunch of half-duplicated commits and other junk on it. There is now a "libusb-1.0+0.1" branch with all of that cl...
2017 Nov 23
2
Have any FreeBSD users tried the new libusb-1.0 branch?
Hi all, I am doing some final testing of the libusb-1.0 branch (specifically https://github.com/zykh/nut.git branch libusb-1.0+0.1 @ dfd514e7), and I am running across a regression in usbhid-ups relative to the previous libusb-0.1 code running on FreeBSD. Basically, the master (2.7.4+; c703fa75) code was able to start running as root, drop privileges (usually to uucp, the default for the ports