search for: 294899

Displaying 8 results from an estimated 8 matches for "294899".

2010 Oct 11
2
[LLVMdev] More DIFactory questions - still stumped
...estingly enough, I just upgraded to the latest Ubuntu (10.10 - Maverick Meercat), and the LLVM-generated code no longer builds: I get the following error in the assembler stage (after the bitcode is converted to assembly): > > SwitchStmtTest.s: Assembler messages: > SwitchStmtTest.s:294899: Fatal error: duplicate .debug_line sections > This is a known Linux binutils bug. There is a llvm pr in bugzilla database, I don't remember the no. though. - Devang > Note that this is still with calls to IRBuilder.SetCurrentDebugLocation() disabled - My FE is not emitting any debug li...
2010 Oct 11
2
[LLVMdev] More DIFactory questions - still stumped
...atest Ubuntu (10.10 - > Maverick Meercat), and the LLVM-generated code no longer builds: I get the > following error in the assembler stage (after the bitcode is converted to > assembly): > >> > >> SwitchStmtTest.s: Assembler messages: > >> SwitchStmtTest.s:294899: Fatal error: duplicate .debug_line sections > >> > > > > This is a known Linux binutils bug. There is a llvm pr in bugzilla > database, I don't remember the no. though. > > Direct .o file writing support for ELF is nearing functionality, it will > define away t...
2010 Oct 11
0
[LLVMdev] More DIFactory questions - still stumped
...ugh, I just upgraded to the latest Ubuntu (10.10 - Maverick Meercat), and the LLVM-generated code no longer builds: I get the following error in the assembler stage (after the bitcode is converted to assembly): >> >> SwitchStmtTest.s: Assembler messages: >> SwitchStmtTest.s:294899: Fatal error: duplicate .debug_line sections >> > > This is a known Linux binutils bug. There is a llvm pr in bugzilla database, I don't remember the no. though. Direct .o file writing support for ELF is nearing functionality, it will define away this sort of issue. -Chris
2010 Oct 11
0
[LLVMdev] More DIFactory questions - still stumped
...graded to the latest Ubuntu (10.10 - Maverick Meercat), and the LLVM-generated code no longer builds: I get the following error in the assembler stage (after the bitcode is converted to assembly): > >> > >> SwitchStmtTest.s: Assembler messages: > >> SwitchStmtTest.s:294899: Fatal error: duplicate .debug_line sections > >> > > > > This is a known Linux binutils bug. There is a llvm pr in bugzilla database, I don't remember the no. though. > > Direct .o file writing support for ELF is nearing functionality, it will define away this sort...
2010 Oct 14
1
[LLVMdev] More DIFactory questions - still stumped
...t;> Maverick Meercat), and the LLVM-generated code no longer builds: I get the >> following error in the assembler stage (after the bitcode is converted to >> assembly): >> >> >> >> SwitchStmtTest.s: Assembler messages: >> >> SwitchStmtTest.s:294899: Fatal error: duplicate .debug_line sections >> >> >> > >> > This is a known Linux binutils bug. There is a llvm pr in bugzilla >> database, I don't remember the no. though. >> >> Direct .o file writing support for ELF is nearing functionality, it...
2010 Oct 11
0
[LLVMdev] More DIFactory questions - still stumped
...)). > Interestingly enough, I just upgraded to the latest Ubuntu (10.10 - Maverick Meercat), and the LLVM-generated code no longer builds: I get the following error in the assembler stage (after the bitcode is converted to assembly): SwitchStmtTest.s: Assembler messages: SwitchStmtTest.s:294899: Fatal error: duplicate .debug_line sections Note that this is still with calls to IRBuilder.SetCurrentDebugLocation() disabled - My FE is not emitting any debug line information at all at this time. > As per usual, this is with a recent LLVM head (like about a week old). > > On Tue, Se...
2010 Oct 10
2
[LLVMdev] More DIFactory questions - still stumped
BTW, the reason I stopped responding to this thread is not because I solved the problem, but because I simply gave up and decided to work on other things for a while since I was making no progress. Having finished those other things (the stack crawler, for one), I'm hoping that time and a fresh start will yield better results. Unfortunately after about a day spent reviewing old llvm-dev
2005 Nov 28
0
glmpath: L1 regularization path for glms
We have uploaded to CRAN the first version of glmpath, which fits the L1 regularization path for generalized linear models. The lars package fits the entire piecewise-linear L1 regularization path for the lasso. The coefficient paths for L1 regularized glms, however, are not piecewise linear. glmpath uses convex optimization - in particular predictor-corrector methods- to fit the