search for: 290mm

I guess the DVI adapter is passive. $ xrandr --props Screen 0: minimum 320 x 200, current 4480 x 1440, maximum 8192 x 8192 XWAYLAND1 connected 1920x1080+0+0 (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) 510mm x 290mm ??? non-desktop: 0 ??? ??? supported: 0, 1 ?? 1920x1080???? 59.96*+ XWAYLAND4 connected 2560x1440+1920+0 (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) 600mm x 340mm ??? non-desktop: 0 ??? ??? supported: 0, 1 ?? 2560x1440???? 59.91*+ On 5/5/20 11:17 AM, Ilia Mirkin wrote: > On Tue, May 5, 20...

Considering getting the card pictured here, http://www.voipsupply.com/product_info.php?products_id=2419&searchid=341962, and was wondering if anyone had any experience with those in a 2950's case. From the picture it looks to be a pretty large card. I'd hate to get it and have it not fit! -- Kyle Sexton

...AssignedTo: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org ReportedBy: bjt23 at cornell.edu QAContact: xorg-team at lists.x.org A bit odd: $ grep -E 'DPI|dimensions' /var/log/Xorg.0.log (**) NOUVEAU(0): Display dimensions: (290, 180) mm (**) NOUVEAU(0): DPI set to (112, 112) 290mm x 180mm and 112x112 DPI are indeed correct (1280x800, 13.3" widescreen), however: $ xdpyinfo | grep -E 'dimensions|resolution' dimensions: 1280x800 pixels (338x211 millimeters) resolution: 96x96 dots per inch X appears to be getting bogus data, which screws up font sizing....

I have two monitors connected to the PC. One is an AOC 23" (1920 x 1080) and the other is a BenQ 27" (2560 x 1440). Nothing special about them. BenQ has a display port and the AOC uses some sort of DVI adapter. I have this event many times and I captured dmesg twice. At least at one time I captured dmesg my computer was under high load: it had about 15 to 20 windows opened