Displaying 1 result from an estimated 1 matches for "290f959".
Did you mean:
2903959
2011 Jan 29
2
another bugfix
Hi,
number three, where I first thought it was a GCC bug but is
apparently bad code in klibc. Submitted with permission:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47533#c6
Patch attached again (sorry) not just because that is easier
with my mail system but also to keep original author intact.
bye,
//mirabilos
--
> emacs als auch vi zum Kotzen finde (joe rules) und pine f?r den einzig
>