search for: 28b

...lt;def> = COPY %R1<kill>; IntRegs:%vreg27 12B %vreg30<def> = LDriw <fi#-1>, 0; mem:LD4[FixedStack-1](align=8) IntRegs:%vreg30 20B %vreg31<def> = LDriw <fi#-2>, 0; mem:LD4[FixedStack-2] IntRegs:%vreg31 24B %vreg26<def> = COPY %R0<kill>; IntRegs:%vreg26 28B %vreg106<def> = TFRI 16777216; IntRegs:%vreg106<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< CurrentTop 32B %vreg29<def> = COPY %D2<kill>; DoubleRegs:%vreg29 48B %vreg28<def> = COPY %D1<kill>; DoubleRegs...

...%vreg30<def> = LDriw <fi#-1>, 0; > mem:LD4[FixedStack-1](align=8) IntRegs:%vreg30 > 20B %vreg31<def> = LDriw <fi#-2>, 0; mem:LD4[FixedStack-2] > IntRegs:%vreg31 > 24B %vreg26<def> = COPY %R0<kill>; IntRegs:%vreg26 > 28B %vreg106<def> = TFRI 16777216; > IntRegs:%vreg106<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< CurrentTop > 32B %vreg29<def> = COPY %D2<kill>; DoubleRegs:%vreg29 > 48B %vreg...

...$0x408 and OR​ $0x810 in close proximity. 278: 81 ca 10 08 00 00 or $0x810,%edx 27e: 89 10 mov %edx,(%eax) 280: f6 c1 40 ​ ​ test $0x40,%cl 283: 74 08 je 28d <t_run_test+0x28d> 285: 81 ca 08 04 00 00 or $0x408,%edx 28b: 89 10 mov %edx,(%eax) 28d: 84 c9 test %cl,%cl 28f: 0f 89 34 01 00 00 jns 3c9 <t_run_test+0x3c9> After ​ r252152:​ Note that the OR $0x408 and OR $0x810 come ​now ​ in reverse order. 35d: 81 c9 08 04 00 00 or $0x408,%ecx 363: 89 4c 24...

...; IntRegs:%vreg27 12B %vreg30<def> = LDriw <fi#-1>, 0; mem:LD4[FixedStack-1](align=8) IntRegs:%vreg30 20B %vreg31<def> = LDriw <fi#-2>, 0; mem:LD4[FixedStack-2] IntRegs:%vreg31 24B %vreg26<def> = COPY %R0<kill>; IntRegs:%vreg26 28B %vreg106<def> = TFRI 16777216; IntRegs:%vreg106<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< CurrentTop 32B %vreg29<def> = COPY %D2<kill>; DoubleRegs:%vreg29 48B %vreg28<def> =...

...gt;; IntRegs:%vreg27 > 12B %vreg30<def> = LDriw <fi#-1>, 0; > mem:LD4[FixedStack-1](align=8) IntRegs:%vreg30 > 20B %vreg31<def> = LDriw <fi#-2>, 0; mem:LD4[FixedStack-2] > IntRegs:%vreg31 > 24B %vreg26<def> = COPY %R0<kill>; IntRegs:%vreg26 > 28B %vreg106<def> = TFRI 16777216; > IntRegs:%vreg106<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< CurrentTop > 32B %vreg29<def> = COPY %D2<kill>; DoubleRegs:%vreg29 > 48B %vreg28<def> = COPY %D1<kill&...

...; IntRegs:%vreg27 12B %vreg30<def> = LDriw <fi#-1>, 0; mem:LD4[FixedStack-1](align=8) IntRegs:%vreg30 20B %vreg31<def> = LDriw <fi#-2>, 0; mem:LD4[FixedStack-2] IntRegs:%vreg31 24B %vreg26<def> = COPY %R0<kill>; IntRegs:%vreg26 28B %vreg106<def> = TFRI 16777216; IntRegs:%vreg106<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< CurrentTop 32B %vreg29<def> = COPY %D2<kill>; DoubleRegs:%vreg29 48B %vreg28<def> =...

Hola a todos, Tengo algunas dudas sobre como introducir en un modelo lineal factores con efectos fijos y aleatorios. Mi diseño es el siguiente: Factores Line: 40 líneas de trigo (Fijo) Rep: 3 Bloques (Aleatorio) Year: 2 Años (Aleatorio) Variable dependiente alpha.ug.mg Nota: Adjunto tabla de datos Dentro del diseño, 'Rep' y 'Year' se considera de efectos aleatorios y

...<def> = LDriw <fi#-1>, 0; >> mem:LD4[FixedStack-1](align=8) IntRegs:%vreg30 >> 20B %vreg31<def> = LDriw <fi#-2>, 0; mem:LD4[FixedStack-2] >> IntRegs:%vreg31 >> 24B %vreg26<def> = COPY %R0<kill>; IntRegs:%vreg26 >> 28B %vreg106<def> = TFRI 16777216; >> IntRegs:%vreg106<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< CurrentTop >> 32B %vreg29<def> = COPY %D2<kill>; DoubleRegs:%vreg29 >> 48B...

On Aug 28, 2012, at 8:18 AM, Sergei Larin <slarin at codeaurora.org> wrote: > > I've described that issue (see below) when you were out of town... I think > I am getting more context on it. Please take a look... > > So, in short, when the new MI scheduler performs move of an instruction, it > does something like this: > > // Move the instruction to its new

...received arp-response (0.00045s latency). All 100 scanned ports on 192.168.2.99 are filtered because of 100 no-responses MAC Address: 00:01:8E:7B:AF:D0 (Logitec) Read data files from: /usr/bin/../share/nmap Nmap done: 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 3.25 seconds Raw packets sent: 1 (28B) | Rcvd: 1 (28B) (e) Hping3 to sent TCP SYN packets # hping3 -n -V -c 3 -S -p 80 192.168.2.99 using eth1, addr: 192.168.2.100, MTU: 1500 HPING 192.168.2.99 (eth1 192.168.2.99): S set, 40 headers + 0 data bytes [send_ip] sendto: Operation not permitted (f) Hping3 to sent UDP datagrams # hping3 -n...

...i#-1>, 0; > >> mem:LD4[FixedStack-1](align=8) IntRegs:%vreg30 > >> 20B %vreg31<def> = LDriw <fi#-2>, 0; mem:LD4[FixedStack-2] > >> IntRegs:%vreg31 > >> 24B %vreg26<def> = COPY %R0<kill>; IntRegs:%vreg26 > >> 28B %vreg106<def> = TFRI 16777216; > >> IntRegs:%vreg106<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< CurrentTop > >> 32B %vreg29<def> = COPY %D2<kill>; DoubleRegs:%vreg29 > >&gt...

Hi all, I''m currently running on Ubuntu Dapper and xen 3.0 testing. I noticed my sound card didnt work. I looked in dmesg and found this: Apr 9 17:49:29 phoenix kernel: [ 27.490852] architecture does not support 28bit PCI busmaster DMA Grepping the kernel I came up with this, from sound/pci/ice1712/ice1712.c: /* check, if we can restrict PCI DMA transfers to 28 bits */ if (pci_set_dma_mask(pci, 0x0fffffff) < 0 || pci_set_consistent_dma_mask(pci, 0x0fffffff) < 0) {...

...sult=replicate(5,B[,sample(colnames(B),10)],simplify=FALSE) I get the following error: "Error in sample(colnames(B), 10) : invalid 'x' argument" anyone has any idea,why?and how to fix it? Thanks -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Error-in-sample%28colnames%28B%29%2C-10%29-%3A-invalid-%27x%27-argument-tp20094713p20094713.html Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

...%vreg30<def> = LDriw <fi#-1>, 0; > mem:LD4[FixedStack-1](align=8) IntRegs:%vreg30 > 20B %vreg31<def> = LDriw <fi#-2>, 0; mem:LD4[FixedStack-2] > IntRegs:%vreg31 > 24B %vreg26<def> = COPY %R0<kill>; IntRegs:%vreg26 > 28B %vreg106<def> = TFRI 16777216; > IntRegs:%vreg106<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< CurrentTop > 32B %vreg29<def> = COPY %D2<kill>; DoubleRegs:%vreg29 > 48B %vreg...

...A NA NA NA ... $ 22B: num NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA ... $ 23A: num NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA ... $ 23B: num NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA ... $ 25A: num NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA ... $ 25B: num NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA ... $ 28A: num NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA ... $ 28B: num NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA ... $ 31A: num NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA ... $ 31B: num NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA ... $ 32A: num NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 1.19 ... $ 32B: num NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA ... $ 34A: num NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA ... $ 34B: num NA NA NA...

...he policing class (<>) if $is_veryhigh && DLB_else_drop($is_veryhigh_pol); class (<>) if $is_low && DLB_else_drop($is_low_pol); } } -- ********************************************** NEW ADDRESS as of 20/12/2004: Dellingstraat 28b 2800 Mechelen ********************************************** aXs GUARD has completed security and anti-virus checks on this e-mail (http://www.axsguard.com) _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWT...

Andy, I've described that issue (see below) when you were out of town... I think I am getting more context on it. Please take a look... So, in short, when the new MI scheduler performs move of an instruction, it does something like this: // Move the instruction to its new location in the instruction stream. MachineInstr *MI = SU->getInstr(); if (IsTopNode) {

...286/2a0> 00000000 <_EIP>: Code; c0130956 <__free_pages_ok+286/2a0> <===== 0: 89 58 04 mov %ebx,0x4(%eax) <===== Code; c0130959 <__free_pages_ok+289/2a0> 3: 89 03 mov %eax,(%ebx) Code; c013095b <__free_pages_ok+28b/2a0> 5: 89 53 04 mov %edx,0x4(%ebx) Code; c013095e <__free_pages_ok+28e/2a0> 8: 89 59 5c mov %ebx,0x5c(%ecx) Code; c0130961 <__free_pages_ok+291/2a0> b: 89 7b 0c mov %edi,0xc(%ebx) Code; c0130964 <__free...

On Aug 30, 2012, at 1:20 PM, Arnold Schwaighofer <arnolds at codeaurora.org> wrote: > The code in collectRanges() does: > > // Collect ranges for register units. These live ranges are computed on > // demand, so just skip any that haven't been computed yet. > if (TargetRegisterInfo::isPhysicalRegister(Reg)) { > for (MCRegUnitIterator Units(Reg,

The code in collectRanges() does: // Collect ranges for register units. These live ranges are computed on // demand, so just skip any that haven't been computed yet. if (TargetRegisterInfo::isPhysicalRegister(Reg)) { for (MCRegUnitIterator Units(Reg, &TRI); Units.isValid(); ++Units) if (LiveInterval *LI = LIS.getCachedRegUnit(*Units))