search for: 288ms

Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "288ms".

Did you mean: 284ms
2012 Mar 05
1
Twitter like route
...03-05 12:44:45 -0800 Processing by LandingController#landing as */* Lawyer Load (0.3ms) SELECT "lawyers".* FROM "users" WHERE "users"."id" = ? LIMIT 1 [["id", 1]] Rendered landing/landing.haml within layouts/landing (0.8ms) Completed 200 OK in 288ms (Views: 23.5ms | ActiveRecord: 2.2ms) -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane...
2019 Nov 08
3
improving the performance of install.packages
Hello, Currently if you install a package twice: install.packages("testit") install.packages("testit") R will build the package from source (depending on what OS you're using) twice by default. This becomes especially burdensome when people are using big packages (i.e. lots of depends) and someone has a script with: install.packages("tidyverse") ... ... later